Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
Trastornos de la Comunicación y del Lenguaje | OB | 1 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
There are no specific prerequisites.
The general objective of this course is to offer students the necessary knowledge and skills to carry out empirical or theoretical research in the field of communication and language disorders, as well as to apply the scientific method in professional practice.
The student learns to formulate relevant questions, to adequately define research objectives and hypotheses, and to discriminate which methods and research designs are most appropriate.
Skills related to the management, analysis and interpretation of data are developed, as well as those related to the search, selection, critical reading and synthesis of relevant information to carry out research and act professionally. The basic concepts on design and adaptation of measuring instruments are also reviewed.
Finally, the student learn to identify and discuss the practical, methodological and technical implications of the research, as well as its repercussions on the health care services and on the progress of scientific knowledge.
Methods, designs and research techniques applied to the field of language and communication disorders.
Skills of evaluation of methodological quality (risk of bias) and critical reading of scientific publications.
Systematic bibliographic searches, synthesis of scientific evidence, and evaluation of their quality.
Management and computerized data analysis (descriptive statistics and introduction to inference).
Fundamentals of design and adaptation of measuring instruments.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Presentations and activities in the classroom | 47.5 | 1.9 | KA01, KA02, KA03, SA01, KA01 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutoring | 11.5 | 0.46 | CA01, SA02, SA03, CA01 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Reading texts and articles, conceptual abstracts, preparation and completion of work and personal study. | 161 | 6.44 | CA01, KA01, KA02, KA03, SA01, SA02, SA03, CA01 |
Traditional teaching techniques are combined with other resources aimed at encouraging meaningful learning.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ev1. (First assessment period). Written individual classroom test. Contents: Data analysis | 4,0 points | 1.5 | 0.06 | CA01, KA01, KA02 |
Ev2. (Second assessment period). Written individual classroom test. Contents: Creation and adaptation of tests and questionnaires | 3 points | 1.5 | 0.06 | KA03, SA03 |
Ev3. (Second assessment period). Written individual or couple work delivered through Moodle. Contents: Scientific documentation and systematic reviews | 3 points | 2 | 0.08 | SA01, SA02 |
In this course the assessment is intended to fulfill a pedagogical function and not just accreditation, and all the evidences are programmed so that they can achieve the corresponding formative return.
Below are the learning evidences that the student will have to contribute, both in the case of continuous assessment (CA) and single assessment (SA) their type and their weight in the final qualification:
- Evidence 1 (Ev1; CA: week 7; SA: week 19). Written individual classroom test. Duration: 2h. Contents: Data analysis. Up to 4 points.
- Evidence 2 (Ev2; CA: week 10; SA: week 19). Written individual classroom test. Duration: 2h. Contents: Creation and adaptation of tests and questionnaires. Up to 3 points.
- Evidence 3 (Ev3; CA: week 13; SA: week 19). Written individual work delivered through Moodle. Includes answer to a questionnaire. Contents: Scientific documentation and systematic reviews. Up to 3 points.
In the case of the SA, Ev1 will be carried out first and then Ev2; the Ev3 will also be delivered on the same day.
Feedback of learning evidence results:
Feedback type | Evidences | Week |
Written | SA | 19 |
Digital tool | Ev1 / Ev2 / Ev3 | 7 / 10 / 13 |
In the classroom | Ev1 / Ev2 / Ev3 | 7 /10 / 13 |
Tutorial | SA | 19 |
Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI): In this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed as an integral part of the development of the work, provided that the final result reflects a significant contribution of the student in the analysis and personal reflection. The student must clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The lack of transparency in the use of AI will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in serious cases.
Assessable students (CA & SA): when they have presented learning evidences with a weight greater than or equal to 4,0 points; otherwise it will appear in final grade sheets as "Not Asessable (NA)".
Course passed (CA & SA): when they have obtained a minimum score of 5,0 points and all the proposed learning evidences have been assessed.
Resit examination (CA & SA):for those students that have not achieved the established criteria to pass the course and have obtained a minimum total score of 3,5 points. Students who have followed the CA must have previously been assessed on a set of activities whose weight equals to a minimum of two thirds of the total score of the course. All learning evidences are retrievable. The same recovery system will be applied for the SA as for the CA.
Review of the final grade: the CA and the SA follow the same procedure.
The SA is requested electronically (e-form) in the specific period (more information on the Faculty website).
No unique final synthesis test for students who enrole for the second time or more is anticipated.
The deliveryof the translation of theassessment tests will be carried out if the requirements established in article 263 are met and your request is made inweek 4 electronically (e-form) (more information on the Faculty website).
Link to the Faculty's evaluation guidelines: https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/graus/graus/avaluacions-1345722525858.html
Basic bibliography
Students will have access through moodle to the documents in pdf format that constitute the basic bibliography and reference manuals of the course.
Complementary bibliography
Abad, F., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V. i García, C. (2011). Medición en Ciencias Sociales y de la Salud. Madrid: Síntesis.
American Psychological Association (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychological Association Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards (2008). Reporting standards for research in psychology. Why do we need them? What might they be? American Psychologist, 63(9), 839-851.
APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271-285.
Atkins D.C., Bedics J.D., McGlinchey J.B., & Beauchaine T.P. (2005). Assessing clinical significance: does it matter which method we use? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(5)5, 982-989. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.5.982
Babbie, E. (2000). Fundamentos de la investigación social. México: Thomson.
Botella, J. & Sánchez Meca, J. (2015). Meta-análisis en ciencias sociales y de la salud. Madrid: Síntesis.
Botella-Ausina J., Suero-Suñe M., & Ximénez-Gómez C. (2012). Análisis de datos en Psicología I. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide.
Espelt, A., Viladrich, C., Doval, E., Aliaga, J., García-Rueda, R. i Tárrega, S. (2014). Uso equitativo de tests en ciencias de la salud. Gaceta Sanitaria, 28, 408-410.doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.05.001
Guardia-Olmos J., Freixa-Blanchart M., Peró-Cebollero M., & Turbany-Oset J.(2010). Análisis de Datosen Psicología (2a Ed). Madrid: Delta publicaciones.
Higgins, J. P. T., Green, S., & Cochrane Collaboration. (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester, England; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Higgins, J. P. T. & Green, S. (Eds.) (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. Disponible a: www.cochrane-handbook.org. Versió española disponible a: http://www.cochrane.es/?q=es/node/269
Jacobson N, & Truax P. (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59 (1), 12-19. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.59.1.12.
Kazdin A.E. (1999). The meanings and measurement of clinical significance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(3), 332-339.
León, O. y Montero, I. (2003). Métodos de investigación en Psicología y Educación (3ª ed.). Madrid: McGrawHill.
Martínez Arias, M.R., Hernández, M.J. i Hernández, M.V. (2006). Psicometría. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Martínez-Arias R, Castellanos-López MA, & Chacón-Gómez JC. (2015). Análisis de Datos en Psicología y Ciencias de la Salud. Volumen I: Exploración de Datos y fundamentos. Madrid: EOS Universitaria.
Meneses, J. (Co.). (2013). Psicometría. Barcelona: FUOC.Martínez-Arias R, Castellanos-López MA, & Chacón-Gómez JC. (2015). Análisis de Datos en Psicología y Ciencias de la Salud. Volumen II: Inferencia Estadística. Madrid: EOS Universitaria.
Moreno, R.; Martínez, R.J. y Chacón, S. (2000). Fundamentos metodológicos en psicología y ciencias afines. Madrid: Pirámide.
Muñiz,J. (2009). Teoría clásica de los tests. Madrid: Pirámide.
Pardo A., Ruiz M.A., & San Martín R. (2009). Análisis de datos en ciencias sociales y de la salud (I). Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.
Pardo A, & San Martín R. (2010). Análisis de datos en ciencias sociales y de la salud (II). Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.
Portell, M. & Vives, J. (2013). Mètodes d'investigació.Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Sánchez-Meca, J., & Botella, J. (2010). Revisiones sistemáticas y meta-análisis: herramientas para la práctica profesional. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 7-17.
Silva, L.C. (2000). Diseño razonado de muestras y captación de datos para la investigación sanitaria. Madrid: Diaz de Santos.
Solanas, A., Salafranca, L., Fauquet, J. y Núñez, M.I. (2005). Estadística descriptiva en Ciencias del Comportamiento. Madrid: Thomson.
Viladrich, C. i Doval E. (Eds.). (2008). Psicometria. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.
The free access software Zotero (https://www.zotero.org/) will be used to carry out the bibliographic management.
The free access software jamovi (https://www.jamovi.org/) will be used to perform statistical and psychometric analyses.
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TEm) Theory (master) | 1 | Catalan/Spanish | first semester | afternoon |