Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
Psychosocial Research and Intervention | OP | 1 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
There are no prerequisites for this course.
The general objective of this subject is to offer the conceptual, methodological and applied bases to design, plan and argue research proposals and/or psychosocial diagnosis from a community, critical and participatory perspective. This objective is materialized in the following specific objectives:
The course considers participatory and group work methodologies, understood as a conceptual, epistemological and ethical approach that places people and communities as active agents of their change. The subject will address social demands in a collaborative, horizontal and relevant for the social context. For the application of these methodologies, the subject will consider specific techniques for the collection of information and dynamization. Among others, the analysis of social networks will be practiced to understand relational structures, group dynamics to facilitate communication and cohesion, and participatory design as a tool for the co-creation of research and intervention projects.
The contents of the subject include:
- Theoretical, epistemological, methodological and ethical foundations of the participatory perspectives of research and social intervention.
- Tools for the interpretation and “negotiation” of social demands: collection and interpretation of information for research and intervention.
- Participatory design for research and intervention.
- Group and participatory techniques:
At the end of the course, students will be able to design a psychosocial research or intervention proposal based on these perspectives and adapted to a specific context.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Seminars and lectures, presentation of projects, elaboration and development of exercises | 30 | 1.2 | CA12, CA13, KA15, KA16, KA17, KA18, SA10, SA11, CA12 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Individual and group tutoring | 7.5 | 0.3 | CA12, CA13, KA15, KA16, KA17, KA18, SA10, SA11, CA12 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Preparation and development of exercises, reading of articles and/or reports of interest and personal study. | 112.5 | 4.5 | CA12, CA13, KA15, KA16, KA17, KA18, SA10, SA11, CA12 |
The teaching methodologies will combine the following forms of work: seminars and lectures, individual and group tutorships, preparation and development of exercises, presentation of projects, reading articles and/or reports of interest and personal study.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ev1: Final individual project: RESEARCH AND METHODOLOGY OF FM THESIS | 50% | 0 | 0 | CA12, CA13, KA15, KA17, SA10 |
Ev2. Collective exercise: INTERVENTION DESIGN | 30% | 0 | 0 | CA13, KA15, KA16, KA17, SA11 |
EV3. Integration of the learning of the course into the Master's Thesis | 20% | 0 | 0 | CA12, CA13, KA15, KA16, KA17, KA18, SA10, SA11 |
CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT:
This subject is assessed on the basis of three evidences:
EV1. (50% of the mark) Individual final project where the DESIGN and METHODOLOGY OF THE FINAL MASTER'S THESIS will be developed. In the case of the psychosocial intervention itinerary, this research will be aimed at intervention, either in the form of diagnosis or needs analysis, or PAR (Participatory Action Research).
This final project will be the same as that submitted in any of the other two optional subjects (A3a: Discursive Perspectives for Psychosocial Research and Intervention, or A3b: Ethnographic Perspectives for Psychosocial Research and Intervention) for which the student has enrolled. In other words, the same work will be assessed from two subjects on the basis of each of the corresponding rubrics and will therefore have two marks: one for each subject from which it is assessed.
EV2. (30% of the mark) Group exercise in which an INTERVENTION DESIGN will be proposed, based on a context and diagnosis of needs previously provided by the teacher. This exercise will take the form of a public presentation in class, on the date indicated in advance by the teacher.
EV3. (20% of the mark) Monitoring of the final work of the subject with the tutor and achievement of the learning outcomes of the subject.
Not assessable: The student will be considered not assessable when the three continuous assessment activities are not provided.
SINGLE ASSESSMENT:
The single assessment will be submitted on the same day as the final individual assignment of the subject (EV1).
The contents will be assessed under similar conditions of format and authorship (individual or collective), through the delivery and/or presentation of the evidences EV1 and EV2.
GRADING:
Subject passed: The subject will be considered passed if the studentobtains an average mark of over 5 in the evaluation evidences as a whole.
Assessable: It will be considered assessable if the student has presented evidence of learning with a weight equal to or greater than 40% of the total of the course.
Non-assessable: It will be considered non-assessable if the weight of the evidence presented is less than 40% of the total of the subject.
Re-evaluation: There is no re-evaluation of this subject.
Assessment guidelines of the Faculty of Psychology: https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/graus/graus/avaluacions-1345722525858.html
Feedback: Written feedback will be provided for all three assessment activities.
Weeks in which the return is made: Ev1 (21); Ev2 (in the week that the presentation is carried and in the following week); Ev3 (21).
Use of Artificial Intelligence
In this subject that you will use Artificial Intelligence(AI) tools as part of your learning process and in the preparation of assignments. We live in a world in constant transformation, and AI is a technology that is already redefining many areas of our society, including the professional and academic. It is essential that, as future professionals, you learn to interact with these technologies effectively and ethically. Your university education is an ideal time to familiarize yourself with AI, explore its capabilities and understand its limitations. The goal is not for AI to replace your critical thinking or your reflection, but for it to become a tool that enhances your analytical capacity and your productivity. However, it is crucial that the use of AI is done with transparency and responsibility. In addition, you should include a critical reflection on how AI has influenced your process and theoutcome of the activity. Your personal contribution in theanalysis and reflection should always be significant. The use of AI in this subject is an opportunity to prepare youfor a future where digital competence, including the use of AI, will be a key skill. Take advantage of this space to experiment, learn and integrate these technologies responsibly into your training.
Evaluation guidelines of the Faculty of Psychology: https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/graus/graus/avaluacions-1345722525858.html
Bibliography
Ahedo, I.; Ormazabal, A.; Villasante, T. R. & Greenwood, D. (2023). Participación, Investigación Acción y Desarrollo Comunitario. Retos, oportunidades y esperanzas. Prisma Social: revista de investigación social, Nº. 43, 2023 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Participación, Investigación Acción y Desarrollo Comunitario: retos, oportunidades y esperanzas), págs. 1-9
Arnanz, L.; García Montes, N. & Villasante, Tomás R. (2023). La investigación y acción participativa y transformadora basada en los grupos motores. Prisma Social: revista de investigación social, Nº. 43, 2023 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Participación, Investigación Acción y Desarrollo Comunitario: retos, oportunidades y esperanzas), págs. 1-9
Ávila, D.; Balasch, M.; Callén, B.; Cassián, N.; García, S.; Montenegro, M. & Pérez, M. (2017). Evaluación e intervención psicosocial. UOC.
Caballero, J.; Martín Gutiérrez, P. & Villasante, T. R. (2019). Debatiendo las metodologías participativas: un proceso en ocho saltos. Empiria: Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales, Nº 44, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Metodología de Investigación Acción), págs. 21-45
Cantera, L.; Herrero, J.; Montenegro, M.; Musitu, G.; Montero, M. & Serrano, I. (2014). Psicología comunitària y benestar social. UOC.
CIMAS (2009). Metodologías participativas. Manual. CIMAS (Observatorio Internacional de Ciudadanía y Medio Ambiente Sostenible)
León Cedeño, A. (2007) El trueque constructivo: buscando formas respetuosas de trabajo con prácticas contrahegemónicas. Fermentum. Revista Venezolana de Sociología y Antropología, 17(50), 626-645. Universidad de los Andes, Mérida, Venezuela. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/705/70505010.pdf
López Sánchez, P.; Alberich, T.; Aviñó, D.; Francés, F.J.; Ruiz Azarola, A.; Villasante, T.R. (2018). Herramientas y métodos participativos para la acción comunitaria. Informe SESPAS 2018. Gaceta sanitaria: Órgano oficial de la Sociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria, Vol. 32, Nº. Extra 1, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Salud comunitaria y administración local), págs. 32-40
Maya, I; García, M. y Santoyana, F.J. (2007) Estrategias de la intervención psicosocial. Madrid: Pirámide
Montenegro, M. (2001). Conocimientos, agentes y articulaciones: una mirada situada a la Intervención Social. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Montenegro, M., Rodríguez, A. & Pujol, J. (2014). La Psicología Social Comunitaria ante los cambios en la sociedad contemporánea: De la reificación de lo común a la articulación de las diferencias. Psicoperspectivas, 13(2), 32-43. https://doi.org//:10.5027/PSICOPERSPECTIVAS-VOL13-ISSUE2-FULLTEXT-433
Moreno, M.A. & Molina, N. (2018). La Intervención Social como Objeto de Estudio: Discursos, prácticas, problematizaciones y propuestas. Athenea Digital, 18(3), e2055. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.2055
Nirenberg, O.; Brawerman, J. & Ruiz, V. (2005). Evaluar para la transformación. Innovaciones en la evaluación de programes y proyectos sociales. Paidós.
Serpa, B. O. (2023). Investigación militante en diseño: Una propuesta para politizar el conocimiento de diseño. Diseña, (22), Article.4. https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.22.Article.4
Tommasino, N. (2021). La producción de lo común: Claves para una reconfiguración de la psicología social comunitaria. Revista puertorriqueña de Psicología, 31(2), 222-236. https://www.repsasppr.net/index.php/reps/article/view/630
VIC (Vivero de Iniciativas Ciudadanas) (2017). Cómo hacer un mapeo colectivo. La Aventura de Aprender: https://laaventuradeaprender.intef.es/proyectos_colab/como-hacer-un-mapeo-colectivo/
Viñar, M. E. (2020) Participación, posición comunitaria y relaciones con el estado en colectivos que construyen autonomía en la periferia urbana de Montevideo, Uruguay. Revista Puertorriqueña de Psicología. 31(2), 284-296. https://www.repsasppr.net/index.php/reps/article/view/638
This module encourages the use of free software for ethical and political reasons. We recommend that students use free tools.
In the different sessions, tools and free software appropriate to each task will be recommended.
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TEm) Theory (master) | 1 | Spanish | first semester | afternoon |