Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
Research in Education | OP | 1 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
This is a mandatory course for the specialisation in Inequalities, Socio-Educational Research and Transformation.
The objective of this course is to understand the relationships between educational systems and inequalities based on various theoretical and empirical contributions from academic literature. The course content will analyze these relationships at the macro, meso, and micro levels. Different theories and approaches to education and the production of educational policy will be considered, as well as aspects related to the culture and structure of educational institutions, and the role of teachers and families in relation to inequalities and social change. The content blocks through which the course is structured will allow for the recognition of inequalities present at different stages—access, process, and outcomes—of schooling and will provide the appropriate tools for reflection, analysis, and the development of research proposals within this framework.
1. Power and Otherness
1.1 Concepts of Theory, Politics, and Education
1.2 Critical Theory: Time Acceleration, Alienation, Education, Resonance, and Unavailability
1.3 Education and Technological System
2. Power and Control
2.1 Politics, State Theories, and Education
2.2 Globalization, Modernization, Development (and Alternatives)
2.3 International Organizations, Evaluation, and Data Colonialism
3. Power and Normativity
3.1 Deconstruction of the Educated Subject from Feminist Critical Theories
3.2 Redefinition of the Concept of Family and Community from Geo-generational Reciprocity
3.3 'The Revolution of Bodies': Anti-coloniality and Crip Pedagogy
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
On-site in large group | 36 | 1.44 | CA29, CA30, CA31, KA29, SA19, CA29 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Individual assignment | 20 | 0.8 | CA29, CA30, CA31, KA28, KA29, SA19, SA20, CA29 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Individual module work | 94 | 3.76 | CA29, CA30, CA31, KA28, KA29, SA19, CA29 |
The learning activities will be carried out through the following formats:
- Lectures
- Reading, analysis, and discussion of articles and documentary sources
- Classroom practice: debates / case studies / exercises
- Individual, supervised work
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Analysis of articles (activities and readings during the development of the module) (GROUP) | 40% | 0 | 0 | CA29, CA30, CA31, KA28, SA19, SA20 |
Attendance and participation (INDIVIDUAL) | 10% | 0 | 0 | CA29, CA30, CA31, KA28, KA29, SA19, SA20 |
Preparation of an academic paper (INDIVIDUAL) | 50% | 0 | 0 | CA29, CA30, CA31, KA28, KA29, SA19, SA20 |
The assessment of this module is built on two pillars: the activities carried out in class (group work) and the preparation of an academic article (individual work). Various assessable exercises will take place during the sessions, while the article must be submitted on 19 March. The teaching staff will return and grade each piece of evidence within a maximum of twenty working days from its submission. The final mark will be the weighted average of all activities, provided that in each one—including the article—the student attains at least 4 out of 10.
Attendance is essential: to qualify for a positive grade, students must have attended at least 80 % of the classes. When evidence is not submitted, or is delivered so incompletely that it cannot be evaluated, the corresponding grade will be “No evaluable”; the same mark will apply in cases of plagiarism or copying, which will also be reported to the programme coordination.
The module offers single assessment for those who require it. Students wishing to opt for this modality must inform the teaching staff during the first two weeks of class. In that case, on 19 March they will submit an academic article—worth 50 % of the grade—and, on the same day, deliver an oral presentation delving into three topics covered in the course, which will account for the remaining 50 %.
If any activity is failed, the resit—applicable to both continuous and single assessment—will be held on 16 April and will consist of revising and reworking the tasks that were not passed. The module does not envisage a synthesis test for students enrolling for a second time.
Finally, the use of artificial-intelligence tools is permitted, provided that a genuinely critical approach is demonstrated: the student must indicate which parts have been assisted, verify the reliability of the information, and assume full responsibility for authorship. Uncritical or undeclared use will be regarded as an academic offence and will result in a grade of “No evaluable.”
Addey, C., Sellar, S., Steiner-Khamsi, G., Lingard, B., & Verger, A. (2017). The rise of international large-scale assessments and rationales for participation. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(3), 434–452.
Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. The Australian Journal of Education Studies, 13(2), 10–17.
Ball, S. J., & Youdell, D. (2008). Privatización encubierta en la educación. Education International.
Beech, J. (2023). Development and its discontents: A South American perspective. In R. Gorur, P. Landri, & R. Normand (Eds.), Rethinking sociological critique in contemporary education: Reflexive dialogue and prospective inquiry (pp. ???–???). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003279457-12
Blaise, M., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2019). Enacting feminist movement pedagogies in the early years. In J. Osgood & K. H. Robinson (Eds.), Feminist researching gendered childhoods: Generative entanglements (pp. 109–120). Bloomsbury Academic.
Britzman, D. P. (1995). Is there a queer pedagogy? Or stop reading straight. Educational Theory, 42(2), 151–165.
Butler, J. (2006). Deshacer el género. Paidós.
Butler, J. (2015). Cuerpos que aún importan. Centre de Cultura Contemporània de Barcelona.
Chmielewski, A. K., Mundy, K., & Farrell, J. (2017). International educational indicators and assessments. In K. Mundy (Ed.), Comparative and international education: Issues for teachers (pp. 361–391). Canadian Scholars’ Press.
Dale, R. (1999). Specifying globalization effects on national policy: A focus on the mechanisms. Journal of Education Policy, 14(1), 1–17.
Documental: Through These Eyes: The politics of education. The value of culture (Dir. Charles Laird). (2004).
Edwards, D. B., Jr. (2021). Globalisation and education: Understanding and problematising approaches to global governance and the global education policy field. In H. Steyn & C. Wolhuter (Eds.), Critical issues in education systems: Comparative-international perspectives (pp. 247–278). Axiom.
Edwards, D. B., Jr., Moschetti, M. C., & Caravaca, A. (2022). Globalization, privatization, and the State: Contemporary education reform in post-colonial contexts. Routledge.
Eurydice. (n.d.). Base de datos: Eurybase y thematic studies. http://www.eurydice.org
Flores, V. (2008). Entre secretos y silencios: La ignorancia como política de conocimiento y práctica de (hetero)normalización. Revista Trabajo Social, 18, 14–21.
Flores, V. (2018). Los cuerpos que (no) imaginamos: Lengua, poder y educación. Estudios del ISHiR, 8(21), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.35305/eishir.v8i21.844
Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1999). El orden deldiscurso. Tusquets Editores.
Foucault, M. (2006). La voluntad de saber. Historia de la sexualidad 1. Siglo XXI.
Garcés, M. (2020). Escola d’aprenents. Galàxia Gutenberg.
Gibson, M., Carrasco, S., Pàmies, J., Ponferrada, M., & Rios, A. (2013). Different systems, similar results: Youth of immigrant origin at school in California and Catalonia. In R. Alba & J. Holdaway (Eds.), The children of immigrants at school: A comparative look at integration in the United States and Western Europe (pp. 84–119). New York University Press.
Gorur, R., Landri, P., & Normand, R. (Eds.). (2023). Rethinking sociological critique in contemporary education: Reflexive dialogue and prospective inquiry. Taylor & Francis.
Halpin, D., & Troyna, B. (1995). The politics of education policy borrowing. Comparative Education, 31(3), 303–310.
Han, B.-C. (2012). La sociedad del cansancio. Herder.
Han, B.-C. (2014). Psicopolítica. Herder.
Han, B.-C. (2016). Sobre el poder. Herder.
Illouz, E. (2012). Intimidades congeladas: Las emociones en el capitalismo. Katz Editores.
Institut Infància i Adolescència de Barcelona. (2019). Oportunitats educatives de la infància i l’adolescència a Barcelona 2018–2019. Institut Infància i Adolescència de Barcelona-IERMB & Ajuntament de Barcelona.
Kirchgasler, C. (2024). Developmentalism as colonial residue: Historicising the onto-epistemic foundations of the global education policy field. Comparative Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2024.2435751
Levinas, E. (2014). Alteridad y trascendencia. Arena Libros.
Levinson, B. A., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power: Theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Educational Policy, 23(6), 767–795.
Lupton, R. (2005). Social justice and school improvement: Improving the quality of schooling in the poorest neighbourhoods. British Educational Research Journal, 31(5), 589–604.
Mèlich, J.-C. (2021). La fragilidad del mundo: Ensayo sobre un tiempo precario. Tusquets.
Mejías, U., & Couldry, N. (2019). Colonialismo de datos: Repensando la relación de los datos masivos con el sujeto contemporáneo. Virtualis, 10(18), 78–97.
Mendoza, B., Bertràn, M., & Pàmies, J. (2021). Feminism, Islam and higher education: Towards new roles and family relationships for young Spanish-Moroccan Muslim women in Spain. Race Ethnicity and Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/???
Moschetti, M. C., Fontdevila, C., & Verger, A. (2019). Políticas, procesos y trayectorias de privatización educativa en Latinoamérica. Educação e Pesquisa, 45, Article e20190230.
Narodowski, M. (2015). Infancia y poder: La conformación de la pedagogía moderna (2.ª ed.). AIQUE Educación.
Pàmies, J., Bertran, M., Ponferrada, M., Narciso, L., & Aoulad, M. (2013). Trajectòries d’èxit i continuïtat acadèmica entre joves marroquins a Catalunya. Temps d’educació, 191–207.
Pàmies, J., Girós, R., & Beremeneyi, A. (2020). “We’re not from outer space”: Natural mentoringnetworks for educational continuity among Roma youth in Spain. In G. Persico, U. Daniele, & C. Ottaviano (Eds.), Growing up is not a private matter: Trajectories to adulthood among Roma youth (pp. 101–124). Mimesis International.
Pérez, M., & Trujillo-Barbadillo, G. (2020). Queer epistemologies in education: Luso-Hispanic dialogues and shared horizons. Palgrave Macmillan.
Pie, A. (2024). Pedagogia crip y la revolución de los cuerpos. Kaótica Libros.
Reay, D. (2001). “Spice girls”, “nice girls”, “girlies” and “tomboys”: Gender discourses, girls’ cultures and femininities in the primary classroom. Gender and Education, 13(2), 153–166.
Rosa, H. (2016). Alienación y aceleración: Hacia una teoría crítica en la modernidad tardía. Katz Editores.
Rosa, H. (2019). Resonancia: Una sociología de la relación con el mundo. Katz Editores.
Rosa, H. (2020). Lo indisponible. Herder.
Sadin, É. (2020). La inteligencia artificial o el desafío del siglo: Anatomía de un antihumanismo radical. Caja Negra.
Sadin, É. (2022). La era del individuo tirano: El fin de un mundo común. Caja Negra.
Sánchez, A., Pàmies, J., Caravaca, A., & Llos, B. (2022). Towards a common public culture? Boundaries to belonging in Catalonia. Social Inclusion, 10(?), 132–142.
Sriprakash, A. (2023). Reparations: Theorising just futures of education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 44(5), 782–795.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2011). La reformulación de la transferencia educativa como estrategia política. In M. Caruso & H. E. Tenorth (Comps.), Internacionalización, políticas educativas y reflexión pedagógica en un medio global (pp. 215–260). Granica.
Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Waldow, F. (2018). PISA for scandalisation, PISA for projection: The use of international large-scale assessments in education policy making—An introduction. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 16(5), 557–565.
Takayama, K. (2018). The constitution of East Asia as a counter-reference society through PISA: A post-colonial/de-colonial intervention. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 16(5), 609–623.
Twum-Danso Imoh, A. (2022). Framing reciprocal obligations within intergenerational relations in Ghana through the lens of the mutuality of duty and dependence. Childhood, 29(3), 439–454.
Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Zancajo, A. (2016). The privatisation of education: A political economy of global education reform. Teachers College Press.
Verger, A., Moschetti, M., & Fontdevila, C. (2018). The expansion of private schooling in Latin America: Multiple manifestations and trajectories of a global education reform movement. In K. Saltman & A. Means (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of global educational reform (pp. ???–???). Wiley.
Verger, A., Novelli, M., & Altinyelken, H. K. (2012). Global education policy and international development: An introductory framework. In A. Verger, M. Novelli, & H. K. Altinyelken (Eds.), Global education policy and international development: New agendas, issues and policies (pp. 1–26). Continuum.
Walkerdine, V. (1993). Sex, power and pedagogy. In M. Alvarado, E. Buscombe, & R. Collins (Eds.), The screen education reader (pp. 207–221). Palgrave.
Walsh, C. (Ed.). (2013). Pedagogías decoloniales: Prácticas insurgentes de resistir, (re)existir y (re)vivir (Tomo 1). Ediciones Abya-Yala.
Ward, S. C., Bagley, C., Lumby, J., Hamilton, T., Woods, P., & Roberts, A. (2016). What is “policy” and what is “policy response”? An illustrative study of the implementation of the leadership standards for social justice in Scotland. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 43–56.
Willis, P. (2008). Los soldados rasos de la modernidad: La dialéctica del consumo cultural y la escuela del siglo XX. Revista de la Asociación de Sociología de la Educación, 1(3), 43–66.
Microsoft Teams will be used in case of virtual teaching
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TEm) Theory (master) | 1 | Spanish | second semester | afternoon |