Logo UAB

Disposition, Transparency and Access to Information

Code: 44747 ECTS Credits: 9
2025/2026
Degree Type Year
Archival Studies and Information Governance OB 1

Contact

Name:
Anna Maria De la Fragua Cobo
Email:
annamaria.delafragua@uab.cat

Teachers

Joana Judas Sánchez

Teaching groups languages

You can view this information at the end of this document.


Prerequisites

It is recommended to have completed the module "Law and legal regime of documents", taught in the first semester of the Master.


Objectives and Contextualisation

The main objective of the course is for students to acquire skills and knowledge that allow them to manage information and documentation in the Public Administration. For this, there will be two training lines; Transparency and access to information (L1); and documentary evaluation (L2)

L1. In the first line of training, related to transparency and access to information, the objectives will be:

• Know the data and information that will be published to comply with the requirements of transparency in the new digital administration.

• Know the regulation of the right of access to public information in order to correctly attend to the requests that are presented in exercise of this right.

• Know the regulation of the right to the protection of personal data, so that these data are treated correctly, and the obligations imposed by the regulations on this matter are complied with.

L2. Records appraisal

That the students have theoretical knowledge and skills to evaluate the documentation and apply criteria to manage the records life cycle in real cases.

These skills are essential in order to manage, work and implement records management systems, taking into account that evaluation becomes one of the pillars of these.

At the end of the course students will have the ability to appraisal, apply the removal procedure and the Catalan disposition rules (TAAD), design retention schedules

and apply elimination and preservation policies.

To achieve the objectives the formative line is composed of theoretical and practical lessons in class as well as some individual exercises to be done outside the classes.


Learning Outcomes

  1. CA16 (Competence) Assess an organisation's information, data and documents in order to decide whether to conserve or eliminate it.
  2. CA17 (Competence) Establish mechanisms for access to the organisation's information within the parameters of transparency and data protection.
  3. KA24 (Knowledge) Define theory on documentary assessment (analogue and digital).
  4. KA25 (Knowledge) Identify conservation schedules and policies for the elimination and conservation of documentation and information.
  5. KA26 (Knowledge) Compare the regulation of the right of access to public information against regulations on the right to protection of personal data.
  6. SA18 (Skill) Apply the criteria of document life cycle management to an organisation.
  7. SA19 (Skill) Apply the concepts and procedures of documentary assessment to an organisation.
  8. SA20 (Skill) Process data in accordance with access and protection regulations.

Content

Course contents

L1.- Transparency, right of access to public information and data protection

 
1.- Transparency and active advertising
1.1.- Transparency of public administrations. Introduction.
1.2.- Scope of application.
1.3.- Active advertising.
1.4.- Reuse of public sector information.
1.5.- Interest groups
 
2.- The right of access to public information
2.1.- Right of access to public information.
2.2.- Limits to the right of access to information.
2.3.- Procedure for exercising the right of access to information.
2.4.- Means of guaranteeing the right of access to information.
2.5.- Other access rights (right of access of persons interested in the procedure, right of regulated access to data protection regulations, right of access of parliamentarians).
 
3.- The right to the protection of personal data
3.1.- Introduction to data protection regulations.
3.1.1.- Regulatory evolution
3.1.2.- Key concepts.
3.2.- Object and scope of application.
3.3.- The controller, joint controller and processor.
3.4.- Principles of data protection regulations and legal basis.
3.5.- Obligations for data processing.
3.5.1.- Transparency and duty of information
3.5.2.- Registration of Processing Activities
3.5.3.- Security measures and national security scheme
3.5.4.- Impact assessment and prior consultation
3.5.5.- Notification of security breaches
3.5.6.- International data transfers
3.5.7.- The figure of the Data Protection Delegate
3.6.- The supervisory authorities in the field of data protection
 
4.- The rights of individuals in the field of data protection
4.1.- The right of access
4.2.- The right of rectification
4.3.- The right to limitation of processing
4.4.- The right of deletion
4.5.- The right of opposition
4.6.- The right to portability
4.7.- The right not to be subject to automated individual decisions
4.8.- Procedure for exercise the rights
 
5.- Processing of specific personal data
5.1.- Processing of data for statistical purposes, archiving in the public interest and research purposes
5.2.- Processing of personal data for police purposes and criminal enforcement
5.3.- Video surveillance
 
6.- Artificial intelligence and data protection
6.1.- Artificial intelligence and data protection.
6.2.- The Artificial Intelligence Regulation.
6.3.- Impact assessment on fundamental rights.
 

L2. Disposition

Topic 1. Document Evaluation. Introduction

Introduction to the theoretical foundations of document evaluation

General principles and basic terminology

The origin of document evaluation

Topic 2. Regulations and legal framework for document evaluation

State legislation

Catalan regional legislation

Municipal evaluation commissions and other evaluation boards

The Catalan National Commission for the Evaluation and Selection of Public Documents (CNAATD)

The Document Evaluation model in Catalonia

Topic 3. Theories, methods, and criteria for document evaluation

Theories, methods, and criteria

The values of archival documents and evaluation

Methodology of the document evaluation procedure. Model for submitting proposals to the CNAATD

Retention/disposal schedules in a records management system. Concept of Disposition

Document Preservation Policies Regarding Retention/Disposal

Topic 4. The Application of Document Evaluation

Study and Analysis of TAADs (Document Access and Evaluation Boards)

CNAATD Proposals and Resolutions

Evaluation Proposals to be Submitted to the CNAATD

Topic 5. The Disposal Procedure

The Document Disposal File

The Record of Disposed Documents

Document Sampling and Disposal Techniques

Topic 6. Evaluation of Other Media and Formats

Evaluation in Other Formats Such as Photographs or Videos

Topic 7. Evaluation in the Electronic Environment

Media Replacement. Secure Digitization, from Paper to Electronic Materials

The Application of the Concepts of Evaluation, Retention, and Disposition in Electronic Document Management Systems

Evaluation in a Date-Centric Model. How to Evaluate Data

Executing Disposal in the Electronic Environment. Auditing, Recording, and Traceability of Document Disposal


Activities and Methodology

Title Hours ECTS Learning Outcomes
Type: Directed      
L1. Classes with student participation 35 1.4 CA17, KA26, SA20, CA17
L2. Classes with student participation 20 0.8
Type: Supervised      
L1. Case solving 31 1.24 CA17, KA26, SA20, CA17
L2. Participation in discussion forums and debates 2 0.08
L2. Work and practical exercises 18 0.72
Type: Autonomous      
L.1 Final test: test of general knowledge of the subject. 8 0.32 CA17, KA26, SA20, CA17
L1. Reading materials 31 1.24 CA17, KA26, SA20, CA17
L2. Study and analysis of cases 9 0.36
L2. Study and analysis of the materials provided 20 0.8

L1. Transparency, right of access to public information and data protection
The detailed calendar with the content of the different sessions will be displayed on the day of the subject presentation and will also be available on the subject's Virtual Campus, where students will be able to find the various teaching materials and all the information necessary for the proper follow-up of the subject.
The guided training activities will be theoretical classes with the participation of students. The supervised activities will be 2 practical exercises to do at home with the explanations received in class. And finally, the autonomous training activities will include reading materials and taking a final test (general knowledge test about L1 part).
Use of AI
For this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed exclusively in support tasks, such as bibliographic or information searches, text correction or translations. The student must clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The lack of transparency in the use of AI in assessable activities will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a partial or total penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in serious cases.
Note 1: The content of the subject will be sensitive to aspects related to the gender perspective and the use of inclusive language.
Note 2: 15 minutes of a class will be reserved, within the calendar established by the center/degree, for students to complete the surveys to evaluate the performance of the teaching staff and the evaluation of the subject.

L2. Disposition

The methodology for this training course is theoretical and face-to-face classes, combined with some practical classes, where students will have to solve some mandatory exercises. During the semester they will have to do 4 mandatory activities and participate in classes, forums and class debates, which make up the final grade.

The detailed calendar with the content of the different sessions will be displayed on the day of the subject presentation and will also be available on the Virtual Campus of the subject, where students will be able to find the various teaching materials and all the information necessary for the adequate follow-up of the subject. In the event of a change in teaching modality due to force majeure according to the competent authorities, the teaching staff will inform of the changes that will occur in the subject programming and teaching methodologies.

Note: The content of the subject will be sensitive to aspects related to the gender perspective and the use of inclusive language.

Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.


Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title Weighting Hours ECTS Learning Outcomes
L1. Exercise 1. Practical case related to the resolution of a request for the right of access to public information on access to information and data protection 30% 9 0.36 CA17, KA26, SA20
L1. Exercise 2. Case study related to data protection 30% 9 0.36 CA17, KA26, SA20
L1. Final exam: test of general knowledge of the subject part 1 30% 9 0.36 CA17, KA26, SA20
L1. Participation in forums or debates 10% 3 0.12 CA17, KA26, SA20
L2. Conservation calendar practice 30% 6 0.24 CA16, KA24, KA25
L2. Document elimination proposal 30% 6 0.24 CA16, KA24, KA25, SA18, SA19
L2. Documentary assessment proposal (PAD) 30% 6 0.24 CA16, KA25, SA19
L2. Presentation of documentary evaluation tables 10% 3 0.12 CA16, CA17, SA19

L1. Transparency, right of access to public information and data protection
The assessment is continuous. Students must demonstrate their progress by carrying out the assessment activities: 2 practical exercises (60% of the final grade), a final test 30% (test of general knowledge of the subject part L1) and also participation in class, forums or other debates proposed (10% of the final grade).
 
CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT
The assessment system is made up of three types of activities that will make up the final grade of the subject. The final grade is distributed as follows:
1. The resolution of two practical cases (60% of the final grade)
2. The continuous assessment test (30% of the final grade), which will consist of a test of general knowledge of the subject part L1.
3. Participation in class forums or other debates proposed (10% of the final grade)
 
To pass the subject, the grades for the resolution of the practical cases must be equal to or greater than 5/10. It is also necessary that the continuous assessment test be passed with a value equal to or greater than 5/10.
To pass the subject, the final grade must be equal to or greater than 5. The final grade is the result of the sum of the grades obtained in each of the assessable elements presented.
A value of 0 points is assigned to assessment activities that have not been carried out.
 
Remediation
A student who finds himself in any of the following situations may take a remedial test that will be held for this purpose at the end of the syllabus, and which may concern any of the subjects studied in class:
• has not submitted/taken one of the continuous assessment tests (practical cases, test).
• having submitted/taken all the assessment tests, has an average grade ofless than 5/10
The student will be considered to have failed the assessment if, once the recovery period has ended, one of the following situations occurs:
• has not submitted/taken at least the 3 continuous assessment tests;
• having submitted at least the 3 continuous assessment tests, the weighted average grade does not exceed 5/10.
 
Consideration of “not assessable”
The grade of “not assessable” will be assigned when the assessment evidence provided by the student is equivalent, at most, to a quarter of the total grade for the subject.
 
Irregularities in assessment activities
In the event of an irregularity (plagiarism, copying, impersonation, etc.) in an assessment activity, the grade for that assessment activity will be 0. In the event that irregularities occur in several assessment activities, the final grade for the subject will be 0.
 
L2. Documentary assessment
 
The assessment system takes into account various activities and aspects. Four different activities carried out during the semester are assessed, in class and at home, with a weight of 100%, all four activities must be passed.
 
When students have not presented a minimum of 2/3 of the assessable activities, they will be considered as non-assessable and will not be able to make up.
 
In this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is not allowed in any of its phases. Any work that includes fragments generated with AI will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a partial or total penalty in the activity grade, or greater sanctions in serious cases.
 
This subject/module does notprovide for the single assessment system.
 
Remediation. A student who finds himself in any of the following situations may take a make-up test, which will be held for this purpose at the end of the syllabus, and which may cover any of the subjects studied in class:
 
- has not passed one of the continuous assessment tests.
 
- Having passed all the assessment tests, has an average grade of less than 5/10
 
It will be understood that the student has not passed the assessment if, once the recovery period has ended, one of the following situations occurs:
 
- has not passed at least 3 continuous assessment tests;
 
- having passed at least 3 continuous assessment tests, the weighted average grade does not exceed 5/10.
 
In the event that the student carries out any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade of an assessment act, this assessment act will be graded 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that may be instructed. In the event that several irregularities occur in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject will be 0.
 

 
 
 
 
 

Bibliography

L1. Transparency, right of access to public information and data protection
 
Berrocal, Lanzarot, Ana Isabel (2019). Estudio Jurídico-crítico sobre la Ley Orgánica 3/2018,de 5 d diciembre, de protección de datos personales y garantia de los derechos digitales. Ed. Reus.
 
Cotino Hueso, Lorenzo i Boix Palop, Andrés. Los límites al Derecho de Acceso a la Información Pública. València l:Tirant lo Blanch, 2021
 
FRA (Fundamental Rights Agency) Manual de legislación europea en materia de protección de datos (2018): https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-coe-edps-2018-handbook-data-protection_es.pdf  
 
Guichot Reina, Emilio i Barrero Rodríguez, Concepción. El Derecho de acceso a la información pública (2021). Editorial Tirant lo Blanch.
 
López, Calvo, José (2019). La adaptación al nuevo marco de protección de datos tras el RGPD y la LOPDGDD. Ed. Bosch
 
Rallo Lombarte, Artemi (dir.), Tratado de Protección de Datos: actualizado con la Ley Orgánica 3/2018, de 5 de diciembre, de protección de datos personales y garantía de los derechos digitales. Tirant lo Blanch, 2019.
 
Troncoso Reigada, A. (Dir.) (2017) Comentario a la Ley de Transparencia, Acceso a la Información Pública y Buen Gobierno. Ed. Civitas
 
Troncoso Reigada, A. (Dir.) (2021) “Comentario al Reglamento General de Protección de Datos y a la Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales y Garantía de los Derechos Digitales”. Ed. Civitas
 
Main organizations guaranteeing the right of access to public information
 
Comissió de Garantia del Dret d’Accés a la Informació Pública 
https://www.gaip.cat/ca/inici/index.html 
 
Consell de Transparència i Bon Govern 
https://www.consejodetransparencia.es/ct_Home/ca/consejo/que-es.html 
 
Data Protection Authorities
 
Autoritat Catalana de Protecció de Dades https://apdcat.gencat.cat/ca/inici/index.html 
 
Agència Espanyola de Protecció de Dades https://www.aepd.es/ 
 
European Data Protection Board: https://edpb.europa.eu
 
European Data Protection Supervisor https://edps.europa.eu/
 
Regulations
 
Regulation (EU) No. 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (GDPR)
 
Llei orgànica 3/2018, de 5 de de desembre, de protecció de dades personals i garantia dels drets digitals (en endavant, LOPDGDD) 
 
Llei 19/2013, de 9 de desembre, de transparència, accés a la informació pública i bon govern.
 
Llei 19/2014, del 29 de desembre, de transparència, accés a la informació pública i bon govern.
 
Decret 8/2021, de 9 de febrer, sobre la transparència i el dret d'accés a la informació pública.
 

L2.Disposition

Identificació

Recurs

BERNAL 2002

2002 BERNAL, Angels, BORFO, Toni, BORRAS, Joaquim, MOYANO, Loli, VILALTA, Montse, “Una experiència d’avaluació en grup: elsdocuments de les universitats”. Arxius. Butlletí del Servei d’Arxius, num.36 Generalitat de Catalunya, 2002 p. 1-4

BOADAS 1989

BOADAS, JOAN, “La documentació dels arxius: eliminarperconservar”. Plecs d’història local, 23, 1989, p. 38-41

CASELLAS 2017

CASELLAS, Lluis-Esteve, "Evaluación archivística, más allá de evaluar para conservar y eliminar" ,Revista REDAR, nº 4, año 2 (Julio-Diciembre 2017). Córdoba (Argentina): RED de Archiveros Graduados de Córdoba, p. 49-77
CASELLAS 2019

CASELLAS, Lluis-Esteve "L’avaluació arxivística en el nou context de les organitzacions", La destrucciód’informació públicaUna mirada multidisciplinària sobre l’eliminació ordenada de la documentació. Barcelona, Oficina Antifrau i Associació d'Arxivers de Catalunya, 2019

CERMENO 2010

CERMENO, Lluis, RIVAS, Elena, Valorar y seleccionar documentos. Que es y cómo se hace. Editorial Trea, 2010. 166 p.

CNATD 1997

COMISSIO NACIONAL D’AVALUACIÓ I TRIA DE LA DOCUMENTACIÓ; Normes i procediments de valoració documental per a arxius públics, Barcelona, Departament de Cultura, 1997

COOK 1991

COOK, Terry; “Appraisal in the information age: a Canadian commentary” Archives and Museum informatics, 13 1991, p. 51-66

COOK 1998

COOK, Terry; “Macroappraisal and functional analysis: Appraisal thoery, strategy and methodology for archivist”, L’évaluation des archives: des nécessités de la gestion aux exigences du témoignage, Gira 1998, p. 27-33

COUTURE 1997

COUTURE, Carol, “L’avaluació dels arxius.Estat de la qüestió”. Lligall, Revista catalana d’arxivística, núm. 11 (1997), p. 59-88.

COUTURE 1997

COUTURE, Carol, “Les calendriers de conservations: fondements theoriques et etat des practiques”, Lligall. Revista Catalana d’Arxivistica, 12. (1997) p.184-189

COUTURE 1997

COUTURE, Carol, “Elaboració i aplicació dels calendaris de conservació”, V Conferència Europea d’Arxius. Les bases de la Professió. Lligall Revista catalana d’arxivística, Barcelona, 1997, p 33-35

CSCDA 2003

 COMISION SUPERIOR CALIFICADORA DE DOCUMENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS; Metodología. Madrid, Ministerio de Cultura, 2003

COX 1994

COX, Richard J.; “The documentation strategy and archival apprisal principles: a different perspective”, Archivaria, 38, 1994 p. 11-36

COX 2002

COX, Richard J.; “The end of collecting: towards a new purpose for archival appraisal” Archival Science, 2, num. 3-4, 2002, p. 287-309

CUMMINGS 2002

Cummings, Susan; “Reengineering NARA Records management policies” Comma,International Journal on Archives, 2002 1-2, p. 63-65

DUCHARME 1996

DUCHARME, Daniel, COUTURE, Carol, “L’evaluation en archivistique, evolution et tendances: etude bibliographique 1980-1995”, Archives, vol 28 (1996-97), p. 59-98

DUCHEIN 1997

DUCHEIN, MIchel, “Le principe de provenannce et la practiques du tri, du classement et de la descripction en archivistique contemporaine”, Lligall. Revista catalana d’arxivística, 12 1997, p. 87-100
FINDLAY 2018 FINDLAY, Cassie, "Avaluació: un instrument estratègicper a la gestió documental actual",  Lligall. Revista catalana d’arxivística 41, 2018

HERNÁNDEZ 2002

HERNÁNDEZOLIVERA, Luis, MORO, Manuela, “Procedimientos de valoración documental, ACAL, ”, Salamanca 2002, 213p
HERNANDEZ 2010 HERNANDEZ OLIVERA, Luis. Del expurgo a la valoración: reflexiones sobre la terminología de valoración y selección de documentos. En: GARCÍA PALACIOS, JOAQUÍN (dir.). La terminología de la archivística. Gijón: Trea, 2010. p 71-88.

HULL 1981

 HULLL, Felix. Utilización de Técnicas de muestreo en la conservación de registros: Estudio del RAMP y directrices al respecto, Programa General de Información y UNISIST, París, 1981

LA TORRE 2000

 

LA TORRE MERINO, José Luis; MARTIN-PALOMINO, Mercedes, Metodologia para la identificación y valoración de fondos documentales, Madrid, Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, 2000, 213 p.

LÓPEZ 1998

 

LÓPEZ GÓMEZ, Pedro; “Identificación y valoración de documentos en España a partir de 1975”, Analesde Documentación, 1 1998,109 p.

LÓPEZ 1999

LÓPEZ HERNÁNDEZ, Maria Angeles, La selección de documentos:problemas ysoluciones desde una perspectiva metodológica, Carmona:S&C Ediciones, 1999, 171 p.

RIVAS 2007

RIVAS PALÁ, Elena; “Valoración y selección en un sistema archivístico”, Legajos, 10, 2007

RODRÍGUEZ 2013

RODRÍGUEZ COYA, Fátima. "Las juntas de expurgo en el contexto de la gestión de documentos judiciales". Jornadas Archivando: la valoración documental. León, 7 y 8 de noviembre 2013

SERRA 2008

SERRA I SERRA, Jordi, Los documentos electrónicos. Que son y cómose tratan, Gijón, editorial Trea, 2008 (Archivos del siglo XXI, 11)

SOLER, 2009

 

SOLER JIMÉNEZ, Joan; Del bit al logos, preservar documents electrònics a l’administració local Barcelona; Diputació de Barcelona, 2009 (Col·lecció Estudis. Série Recursos culturals, 4). 349 p.

SUQUET 1996

SUQUET I FONTANA, M. Àngels;PÉREZ I PENA, Josep, “Consideracions sobre l’avaluació i tria de les fotografies”. A: Actes de les IV Jornades Antoni Varés, 1996

VVAA 2009

 

VVAA; Manual d’Arxvística i gestió documental, Associació d’Arxivers de Catalunya, 2009. 543 p.

CRUE 2012

“La valoración de los documentos electrónicos: estado de la cuestión”. CRUE. Conferencia de Archiveros de Universidades Españolas. Grup de trabajo de documentos electrónicos, 2012

VOUTSSAS 2014

VOUTSSAS-M, Juan; BARNARD AMOZORRUTIA, Alicia, Glosario de preservación archivística digital. Versión 4.0. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2014

VVAA 2003

 

El refinado arte de la destrucción: la selección de documentos”, Tábula, 6, 2003, 274p

 

 

Webgrafia

Identificació

Recurs

CNAATD

 

http://cultura.gencat.cat/ca/departament/estructura_i_adreces/organismes/dgpc/temes/arxius_i_gestio_documental/cnaatd

CSCDA (MinisterioCultura)

 

http://www.mcu.es/archivos/MC/CSCDA/Presentacion.html

Metodologia CNAATD

http://cultura.gencat.cat/web/.content/dgpc/arxius_i_gestio_documental/03_cnaatd/03__avaluacio_disposicio/avaluacio_i_acces/metodol_dipleg_04.pdf

InterPares Project

www.interpares.org/welcome.cfm

- Appraisal task force report de InterPares2

- Record/Archives Appraisal in Latin America

Comissió Municipal de Barcelona

http://w110.bcn.cat/portal/site/ArxiuMunicipal/menuitem.a09d14181a8397aaca63ca63a2ef8a0c/?vgnextoid=04f82da0e4103310VgnVCM10000074fea8c0RCRD&vgnextchannel=04f82da0e4103310VgnVCM10000074fea8c0RCRD&lang=ca_ES

Pais Basc

http://eah-ahe.org/recursos_profesionales.php

Nova Zelanda

http://archives.govt.nz/sites/default/files/appraisal_policy_0.pdf

ARMA

http://www.arma.org/r2/how-do-i--/how-to-build-a-retention-schedule

Scottish Council on Archives

http://www.scottisharchives.org.uk/scarrs

Arxiu Municipal de Roses

http://www.roses.cat/la-vila/arxiu-municipal/dret-dacces-als-documents-publics

Calendaris de conservació

Arxiu Municipal de Barcelona

http://w110.bcn.cat/portal/site/ArxiuMunicipal/menuitem.a09d14181a8397aaca63ca63a2ef8a0c/?vgnextoid=dae1aa0a11ef2310VgnVCM10000074fea8c0RCRD&vgnextchannel=dae1aa0a11ef2310VgnVCM10000074fea8c0RCRD&lang=es_ES

Govern de Navarra

http://www.navarra.es/home_es/Temas/Turismo+ocio+y+cultura/Archivos/Sistema+archivistico/Comision+de+Evaluacion+Documental/calendarios.htm

Ministeri de l’Interior

http://www.interior.gob.es/ca/web/archivos-y-documentacion/archivo-general-sistema/sistema-archivistico/organos-competentes/comision-calificadora-documentos-ad/calendario-conservacion-de-series-documentales-mir

Arxius de l’Estat de Queensland

http://www.archives.qld.gov.au/Recordkeeping/RetentionDisposal/Pages/GRDS.aspx

Registres d’eliminació

Ajuntament de Castellbisbal

http://www.castellbisbal.cat/media/repository/arxiu/0801150521_registre-eliminacions-arxiu-castellbisbal.pdf

Ajuntament de Terrassa

www.terrassa.cat/arxiumunicipal

Eines d'arxiu: calendari de conservació 1996-2016

Ajuntament de Sant Cugat

http://dona.santcugat.cat/web/eines-de-larxiu

 

Ajuntament de Salt

https://www.seu.cat/seue-fitxer?id=67096

Norma Tècnica d’Interoperabilitat

 

Norma Tècnica de copiat i conversió de documents electrònics

http://www.mpt.gob.es/dms/es/publicaciones/centro_de_publicaciones_de_la_sgt/GUIAS_NTI/text_es_files/Guia_copiado-conversion-doc-elec-INTERNET.pdf

 

Còpia autèntica Generalitat de cat

http://www20.gencat.cat/docs/governacio/Butlletins/dgpae/11/documents/e-copia.pdf

 

 


Software

There is no specific program for this modul. 


Groups and Languages

Name Group Language Semester Turn
(TE) Theory 1 Catalan second semester afternoon