Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
Legal and Forensic Psychology | OB | 0 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
No requirements.
This module aims to develop the Legal and Procedural common basis of the field in which the professional role is going to be performed, eminently in the legal field. Likewise, essential tools will be provided for the understanding of the profession such as the structuring of the report, ethical aspects, structuring the expert process, as well as the important distinction between Legal and Forensic Psychology, initiating the bases in this module of both areas of knowledge that will be developed in the following modules.
Thus, it is intended to:
This module is structured in the following contents:
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Master classes and practical sessions | 60 | 2.4 | 2, 1, 8, 5, 6, 3 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutorials | 20 | 0.8 | 4, 7 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Autonomous work | 220 | 8.8 | 4, 8, 5, 6, 3, 9 |
This module is of a professional nature, which involves masterful teaching by experts in their subjects. Thus, a methodology is proposed in which different contents will be developed in each session, taught by the different specialists. In the course of the sessions, there will be activities that might be assessed as stated in the assessment section. Methodologically, these activities will consist of case resolution, participation in debates and/or exams ans tests, etc. Finally, students will have to do autonomous course work to pass the subject.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Practical tests and reports | 30% | 0 | 0 | 2, 1, 4, 7, 5, 3, 9 |
Theoretical tests (exams) | 40% | 0 | 0 | 2, 1, 8, 3, 9 |
Written work and reports | 30 | 0 | 0 | 2, 1, 4, 7, 8, 6, 3 |
The approach that we propose, aims to gather different scores on participation in the subject that allows to the continuous and definitive assessment. A continuous assessment will be carried out, measured through three different evidences. The final grade for the module 1 is planned between 0 and 10 point. It will be considered that a student has passed the subject if, in the weighted average of the different evidences, they obtain a score equal to or greater than 5, being the minimum grade for each piece of evidence a score of 4 for weighting purposes.
a) THEORETICAL EXAM (40% OF THE FINAL MARK). There will be a multiple choice exam on the content of the module (15th Week). In the period of two weeks maximum from the end of the test, students will receive their numeric qualification.
b) PRACTICAL EXAM (30% OF THE FINAL MARK). A case resolution exam will be carried out on the content of the module; it’s an individual essay based on short questions (15th Week). In the period of two weeks maximum from the end of the practical exam, students will receive their numeric qualification.
c) WORKS AND REPORTS (30% OF THE FINAL MARK). During the course of the Module, the delivery of a work will be requested, which may consist of an expert report, a follow-up report or a practical case analysis. Specific information on the case and/or type of report will be provided at the beginning of the semester via Moodle. It has to be delivered on-line (Moodle Campus) and has to be performed by two students (15th week). In the period of two weeks maximum from the report delivery, students will receive their numeric qualification through a rubric in the Virtual Campus.
In the event of failing any of the 3 tests (not in cases of unattendance), the grade for each failed test can be resit (independently and with an evaluation test that will follow the same evaluative format as the failed test). In case of resit, the maximum grade achievable for each evidence will be 7.
STUDENTS WITHOUT ASSESSMENT
Students who do not deliver/perform two or three of the proposed evidences are considered non-assessable. Thus, in case of not doing any, or in case of doing only one (passed or not), they will be considered non-evaluable.
ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS OF THE EVALUATION
• In the event that during an exam the presence of a student cheating is detected, they will automatically fail the test without the possibility of accessing the resit. In case of plagiarism in the writing of works, the option of direct suspense will be considered.
• Students who do NOT present all the evidence of the Module will NOT pass (fail) the subject
• In this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is not allowed in none of its phases. Any work that includes fragments generated with AI will be considered an academic dishonesty and may involve a partial or total penalty in the grade of the activity.
• Once the subject has been passed (grade ≥ 5) systems cannot be established to improve the final grade.
• For more information, you have the Guide to the Assessment Guidelines of the Faculty of Psychology https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/graus/graus/avaluacions-1345722525858.html
As this is a subject with diverse content, lecturers will provide selected bibliography for each of the different areas and topics covered. There is a mandatory reading in this course:
- Garrido, E.; Lovelle, M.I.; Mora, S. y Pina, R. (2022) Introducción a la psicología forense. Principios para la evaluación. UOC Editorial
Not foreseen.
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TEm) Theory (master) | 1 | Catalan/Spanish | first semester | afternoon |