Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity | OB | 1 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
This course is scheduled for the second semester of the first year and there is no established prerequisites for it.
The objectives of this course are:
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Master classes | 32 | 1.28 | 8, 4, 1, 5, 7, 9, 3, 6, 2, 10, 12, 11 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutoring sessions and workshops | 17 | 0.68 | 8, 4, 1, 5, 7, 9, 3, 6, 2, 10, 12, 11 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Reading, exercises and study | 61 | 2.44 | 8, 4, 1, 5, 7, 9, 3, 6, 2, 10, 12, 11 |
Directed
Supervised
Autonomous
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
EV1. Critical evaluation of existing research | 25% | 10 | 0.4 | 8, 4, 5, 9, 3, 2, 11 |
EV2. Proposal of an original investigation | 25% | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 7, 3, 6, 10, 12 |
EV3. Evaluation of published tables and figures | 25% | 10 | 0.4 | 4, 5, 9, 6, 2, 11 |
EV4. MT Project pesentation | 25% | 10 | 0.4 | 7, 2, 11 |
Evidence Code |
denomination |
Percent |
Format |
Authorship |
Via |
Week |
Ev1. |
Critical evaluation of existing research |
25 |
written |
Individual |
Presential |
4 |
EV2. |
Proposal of an original investigation |
25 |
written |
Individual |
Presential |
5 |
EV3. |
Evaluation of published tables and figures |
25 |
written |
Individual |
Both |
7 |
EV4. |
MT Project pesentation |
25 |
Oral |
Individual |
Presential |
11 |
Kind of feedback |
Evidence |
Week |
Written |
|
|
Digital tool |
EV4 |
12 |
Classroom |
EV1 |
4 |
tutorial |
EV2 EV3 |
7 10 |
The student who presents 40% or less of the evaluative weight of the evidence will be considered non-evaluable.
The single evaluation will be carried out at the end of the semester. It will consist of a 4-hour face-to-face test in which the 4 evaluation evidences will be evaluated in the following format: a) Written reflection, b) Oral presentations, and c) Written test with open questions.
In this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed as an integral part of the development of the work, provided that the final result reflects a significantcontribution of the student in the analysis and personal reflection. The student must clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The lack of transparency in the use of AI will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in serious cases.
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000
-
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TEm) Theory (master) | 1 | Catalan | second semester | afternoon |