Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
Management, Organization and Business Economics | OB | 0 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Previous admission in the Master in Management, Organization and Business Economics (MMOBE).
By the end of the module, students are expected to have acquired a solid understanding of advanced concepts and analytical tools applicable to the evaluation of business competitive performance. Specifically, the course aims to:
Provide students with the conceptual foundations and economic logic needed to understand and formulate business, corporate, and international strategies. Emphasis is placed on value creation, strategic positioning, and the articulation of strategic purpose within competitive environments.
Develop students’ ability to assess business financial performance through the measurement and decomposition of productivity, efficiency, profitability, costs, and returns on assets, with a focus on identifying the sources of performance variation across firms.
Provide students with a solid conceptual and empirical understanding of research on entrepreneurship and innovation, helping them critically engage with key frameworks, methodologies, and current research questions that shape the entrepreneurial and innovation processes.
Offer a rigorous overview of current research in marketing, enabling students to understand and critically evaluate emerging topics in the field, and to analyze their implications for firm strategy and competitive positioning.
Strengthen students’ ability to link theory with applied work. Given a business performance analysis problem, students will be able to identify an appropriate theoretical framework, select suitable analytical methods, and carry out a well-informed empirical analysis.
This module provides a theoretical and empirical overview of the economics of business competitive analysis, with special focus on the most recent advances and the main areas of research in the field. Based on the fundamentals of economic theory, the lectures introduce and apply alternative approaches to the analysis of business strategy, marketing and its translation to firm performance. The module also links performance measurement with profitability, profit, cost and rate of return on assets. No assumption is made about the unit under evaluation which makes the methodology suitable for the analysis of the behaviour of organizations which do not seek to maximize profits. The module also emphasizes the critical role of the entrepreneur in driving business dynamics and thoroughly examines key factors influencing entrepreneurial behaviour and innovation processes.
The module is divided into four parts: business strategy, performance measurement, entrepreneurship and innovation, and marketing. The following topics will be covered:
Economics of Strategy
Business strategy
Corporate level strategy
International strategy
Strategic purpose
The Economics of Performance Measurement
Review of production economics
Efficiency measurement
Productivity and profitability
Productivity and profit
Productivity and cost
Productivity and returns on assets
Entrepreneurship and Innovation
Entrepreneurship and individual determinants
Environmental factors in entrepreneurship
Venture growth and scaling
Innovation strategies
Marketing
Individual targeting
Personalization
Customer value
Response based models
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lectures and case discussions | 100 | 4 | 11, 18, 2, 14, 3, 4, 6, 5, 7, 13, 15, 16, 9, 10 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Training and monitoring of work in progress and cases | 25 | 1 | 11, 14, 3, 4, 5, 7, 13, 15, 16, 8, 9, 10, 1 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Reading related cases and practical preparation, study preparation of schemes. | 85 | 3.4 | 11, 12, 18, 2, 3, 4, 6, 5, 7, 13, 15, 16, 9, 10, 1 |
The module combines theoretical lectures with practical sessions that encourage the active participation of students. Learning activities include: lectures on main topics, making of problems and computer exercises, reading and critical reviewing of academic papers. This is an interactive moduel. Case preparations and in-class discussions will form the important benchmarks of progress. In-class discussions give students an opportunity to apply material from the class to real-world problems. Other sessions will be primarily dedicated to lecture material and shorter discussions.
In addition, the module incorporates the Value Creation Wheel (VCW) methodology as a tool to support strategic decision-making. This methodology enables the structured tackling of complex or ambiguous problems, the generation of innovative solutions, and the facilitation of value-centered decisions.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assignments | 50 | 22 | 0.88 | 11, 12, 18, 2, 3, 4, 6, 5, 7, 13, 15, 16, 8, 9, 10, 1 |
Class participation | 10 | 2 | 0.08 | 12, 14, 3, 4, 6, 5, 7, 15, 16, 8, 9, 1 |
Test | 40 | 16 | 0.64 | 2, 17, 3, 7, 13, 15, 8, 9, 1 |
The module assessment will consist of:
- Assignments (presentation of critical reviewing of papers, resolution of problems, final paper, etc)
- Participation in class
- Test (midterm test and final exam).
This module can not be evaluated by the means of a single assessment.
A student who does not complete any assessable activity is considered 'non-assessable'. Therefore, once a student participates in any component of the continuous assessment, they can no longer be classified as 'non-assessable'.
Attending the sessions is a requirement.
The module is passed when the final mark is equal or higher than five.
For this module, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted exclusively for support tasks—such as bibliographic or information searches, text correction, idea clarification, brainstorming, and receiving feedback—unless specific instructions are provided by the instructor. Students should not use AI tools to generate complete answers, write full sections of assignments or solve exam questions. Any AI generated content must be clearly identified. Students should specify the AI tools used and include a critical reflection on how these tools influenced both the process and the final result of the activity. Lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered academic dishonesty and may result in a partial or total penalty on the grade for the activity, or more serious sanctions in severe cases.
Anokhin, S. and J. Wincent (2012). “Start-up rates and innovation: A cross-country examination.” Journal of International Business Studies 43(1), 41-60.
Arocena P. and C. Waddams (2002), “Generating Efficiency: Economic and Environmental Regulation of Public and Private Generators in Spain.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 20, 41-69.
Arocena, P., L. Blázquez and E. Grifell-Tatjé (2011), “Assessing the Consequences of Industry Restructuring on Firms’ Performance,” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 14:1 (March), 21-39.
Arocena P., D. Saal and T. Coelli (2012), “Vertical and horizontal scope economies in the regulated US electric power industry.” Journal of Industrial Economics 60, 434-67.
Audrestch, D.B. and M. Keilbach (2008), “Resolving the knowledge paradox: Knoweldge-spillover entrepreneurship and economic growth.” Research Policy 37, 1697-1705.
Autio, E. and Z. Acs (2010), “Intellectual property protection and the formation of entrepreneurial growth aspirations.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 4, 234-251.
Baum, J.R., E.A. Locke and K.G. Smith (2001), “A multidimensional model of venture growth”,. Academy of Management Journal 44, 292-303.
Besley, T., and M. Ghatak (2007), “Retailing public goods: the economics of corporate social responsibility”, Journal of Public Economics 91(9), 1645-1663
Blázquez, L. and E. Grifell-Tatjé (2011), (2011), “Evaluating the Regulator: Winners and Losers in the Regulation of Spanish Electricity Distribution,” Energy Economics 33(5), 807-815.
Bogetoft, P. (2012), Performance Benchmarking. Measuring and Managing Performance. New York. Springer.
Brea-Solís, H., Grifell-Tatjé, E., 2019, “A Business Model Analysis of Kmart’s Downfall”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 47 (2), 111-128.
Brea-Solís, H., Grifell-Tatjé, E., 2023, “Winners and Losers of the Productivity Gains of the American Agricultural Sector,” Applied Economic 55 (33), 3915-3930.
Brea-Solís, H., R. Casadesus-Masanell & E. Grifell-Tatjé (2015), ”BusinessModel Evaluation: Quantifying Walmart’s Sources of Advantage,” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 9(1), 12-33.
Calleja Blanco, J., Grifell-Tatjé, E., 2016, “Potential Coopetition and Productivity among European Automobile Plants.” in Aparicio, J., Lovell, C.A.K., and Pastor, J.T. (ed.), Advances in Efficiency and Productivity. Berlin: Springer, pp. 249-274.
Capelleras J.L., K.M. Mole, F.J. Greene, and D.J. Storey (2008), “Do more heavily regulated economies have poorer performing new ventures? Evidence from Britain and Spain.” Journal of International Business Studies 39, 688-704.
Capelleras, J.L., I. Contin-Pilart and M. Larraza-Kintana (2011), “Publicly funded prestart support for new firms: who demands it and how it affects their employment growth”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29, 821-847.
Capelleras, J.L., Contín-Pilart, I, Larraza-Kintana, M., Martin-Sanchez, V. (2019): “Entrepreneurs’ human capital and growth aspirations: The moderating role of regional entrepreneurial culture”, Small Business Economics, 52, 3-25.
Casadesus-Masanell, R., & J. E. Ricart (2010),”From Strategy to Business Models and onto tactics,” Long range Planning 43: 195-215.
Casadesus-Masanell, R., & J. E.Ricart (2011). “How to Design a Winning Business Model.” Harvard Business Review 89(1-2), 100-107.
Chen, X., Grifell-Tatjé, E., Fu, Tt., 2023, “A profit difference decomposition model for measuring group performance: an application to Chinese and Taiwanese commercial banks,” fOMEGA. The International Journal of Management Science [Available online 20 May 2023].
Contín I. and M. Larraza (2015), “Do entrepreneurial role models influence the nascent entrepreneurial activity of immigrants?” Journal of Small Business Management (Article first published online: 7 JAN 2015) [DOI:10.1111/jsbm.12153]
Chintagunta, P.K., Chu, J. y Cebollada, J. (2012), “Quantifying Transaction Costs in Online / Offline Grocery Channel Choice”, Marketing Science, January/February, 31 (1), 96-114.
Davidsson, P. and B. Honing (2003), “The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs.” Journal of business Venturing 18(3), 301-331.
Engelen, A., V. Gupta, L. Strenger and M. Brettel (2015), “Entreprenurial orientation, firm performance, and the moderating role of transformational leadership behaviors.” Journal of Management 41(4),1069-1097.
Estache, A. & E. Grifell-Tatjé (2013), “How (un) even was the distribution of the impacts of Mali’s water privatizationacross stakeholders?” Journal of Development Studies 49(4), 483 – 499.
Fernández-Kranz, D. and J. Santalo (2010), “When Necessity Becomes a Virtue: The Effect of Product Market Competition on Corporate Social Responsibility”, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 19(2), 453-487.
Fisher, G. (2012); “Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: a behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36 (5), 1019–1051.
Grifell-Tatjé, E., Lovell, C.A.K. (1997). "The Sources of Productivity Change in Spanish Banking". European Journal of Operational Research 98(2), 364 - 380.
Grifell-Tatjé, E. & C.A.K. Lovell (1999), "Profits and Productivity”. Management Science. 45(9), September: 1177 – 1193.
Grifell-Tatjé, E. and C.A.K. Lovell (2015), Productivity Accounting. The Economics of Business Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Grifell-Tatjé, E., C.A.K. Lovell and R. Sickles (2018), "Chapter 1. Overview of Productivity Analysis: History, Issues and Perspectives," in E. Grifell-Tatjé, C.A.K. Lovell and R. Sickles, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis, Oxford University Press: New York.
Grifell-Tatjé, E., C.A.K. Lovell and P. Turon, (2018), “The Business Foundations of Social Economic Progress,” BRQ-Business Research Quarterly 21 (4), 278 - 292.
Grifell-Tatjé, E., C.A.K Lovell, (2021), ”Dual Productivity Analysis: A Konüs/Shephard Approach,” European Journal of Operational Research 289 (1), 328-337.
Guadagni, P.M. and J.D. Little, (1983) "A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data," Marketing Science, 2 (Summer), 203-238.
Gupta, S., and D. Lehmann and S. Ames Stuart (2004), “Valuing customers,” Journal of Marketing Research 41(1), 7-18.
Heal, G. (2005), “Corporate Social Responsibility: An Economic and Financial Framework”, The Geneva Papers 30, 387-409.
Holt, D.B., Quelch, J.A., Taylor, E.L. (2004): “How global brands compete”. Harvard Business Review 82 (9), 68-75.
Howell, C., Grifell-Tatjé, E., (2022), “Market Heterogeneity and the Relationship betweenCompetition and Price Dispersion: Evidence from the U.S. Airline Market,” Transport Policy 125, 218-230.
Howell, C., Grifell-Tatjé, E., 2023, “An Index Approach to Measuring Product Differentiation: A Hedonic Analysis of Airfares,” Review of Income and Wealth, 69 (4), December, 952-974.
Kumbhakar,S.C. and C.A.K. Lovell (2012), Stochastic Frontier Analysis, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Siegel, D.S., and. D.F. Vitaliano (2007), “An Empirical Analysis of the Strategic Use of Corporate Social Responsibility”, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 16(3), 773-792.
Somech, A. and A. Drach-Zahavy (2013), “Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: the role of team composition and climate for innovation.” Journal of Management 39, 684-708.
Storian, M.C.; A. Rialp and J. Rialp (2012), “International Marketing Strategy and Export Performance in Spanish SMEs: a Contingency Approach”. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 15, 213 – 236.
Train, K.E., (2012) Discrete Choice Methodswith Simulation, New York :Cambridge University Press.
Wiklund, J. and D. Shepherd (2003), “Aspiring for, and achieving growth: The moderating role of resources and opportunities.” Journal of Management Studies 40 (8), 1919–1941.
Winter, S.G. & G. Szulanski (2001), "Replication as Strategy," Organization Science 12(6), Nov/Dec: 730-743.
In this module the use of specific software is not foreseen.
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PLABm) Practical laboratories (master) | 30 | English | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TEm) Theory (master) | 30 | English | second semester | morning-mixed |