Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
Social and Cultural Anthropology | OB | 2 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
There are no prerequisites.
The subject is taught in the second semester of the second year of the degree, after 'Economic Anthropology' and 'Anthropology of Kinship' in the first semester, and simultaneously with 'Political Anthropology' in the same semester. These subjects together make up 'Classical Fields of Anthropology'. The subject seeks to develop anthropological theory and analysis of cultural diversity in relation to religion, ritual and symbolic-cognitive systems. The course also focuses on applying disciplinary knowledge to these areas to identify and study contemporary sociocultural reality, particularly the analysis of current rituals. Therefore, the objective is to propose critical assumptions, concepts, and theories related to these fields of knowledge for interpreting the symbolic and ritual dimensions. At the same time, it provides a methodology for in-depth analysis and ethnographic interpretation of the realities around us.
This subject's syllabus focuses mainly on classical theories of religion, symbols and rituals. It reviews key issues for understanding the religious phenomenon, taking an anthropological approach to different forms of symbolic communication, classification, symbolism, processes and ritual dramas. The course also focuses on rituality, providing current examples of symbolic representation and demonstrating their effectiveness.
Syllabus
Introduction to the subject
Introduction to rituality (selecting the ritual to be analysed in the practical work).
Religion Thematic Block
Symbolism Thematic Block
Ritual Thematic Block
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Theoretical classes, with viewing of ethnographic materials and discussion of contents | 40 | 1.6 | CM14, KM13, KM14, KM15, KM16, KM17, SM19, SM20, SM21, CM14 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Supervision through tutorials of the observation, description and analysis of a ritual. Oral presentations of ritual analysis | 10 | 0.4 | CM14, SM20, SM21, CM14 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Comprehensive reading of mandatory and recommended bibliography | 25 | 1 | CM14, KM13, KM14, KM15, KM16, KM17, SM19, CM14 |
Observation, description and analysis of a ritual | 10 | 0.4 | SM20, SM21, SM20 |
Personal study | 25 | 1 | CM14, KM13, KM14, KM15, KM16, KM17, SM19, CM14 |
The subject is designed to provide students with a variety of training activities:
Directed and supervised
Autonomous
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Participation in the classroom, in theoretical and practical discussion | 20 | 20 | 0.8 | KM13, KM14, KM15, KM16, KM17, SM19, SM21 |
Practical work (individual or group) on the analysis of a ritual | 30 | 10 | 0.4 | CM13, SM20, SM21 |
Written work (individual theoretical work) | 50 | 10 | 0.4 | CM14, KM13, KM14, KM15, KM16, KM17, SM18, SM19 |
The continuous assessment system is organised into three modules, each of which contributes a specific percentage to the final grade.
At the beginning of the course, the delivery dates for the work will be provided, along with instructions for completing it. Students will be informed of the procedure and date of revision of the grades at the time of each evaluation activity.
If a student commits an irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade of an assessment (e.g. plagiarism or cheating), this assessment will be graded as 0. If a student commits several irregularities in the assessments of the same subject, the final grade for this subject will be 0.
This subject allows the use of AI technologies exclusively for support tasks such as [***bibliographic or content-based searches, text correction or translations, where applicable]. Other specific situations may be contemplated, as deemed appropriate by the teacher. The student must clearly (i) identify which parts have been generated using AI technology; (ii) specify the tools used; and (iii) include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and final outcome of the activity. Lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in the assessed activity will be considered academic dishonesty; the corresponding grade may be lowered, or the work may even be awarded a zero. In cases of greater infringement, more serious action may be taken.
The single assessment system provides for three assessment activities, which take place at the end of the semester.
The same recovery system will be applied to continuous assessment.
Recommendation to students when citing bibliography: How to cite and prepare the bibliography https://www.uab.cat/web/estudia-iinvestiga/com-citar-i-elaborar-la-bibliografia-1345708785665.html
Compulsory readings
Religion Theme Block
Evans-Pritchard, Edward Evan (1991 [1965]). “Las teorías psicológicas” & “Las teorías sociológicas”. In: Las teorías de la religión primitiva. Siglo XXI, pp. 41-82 y 83-128.
Delgado, Manuel (1993). “La religiosidad popular. En torno a un falso problema”. Gazeta de Antropología, 10. http://www.ugr.es/~pwlac/G10_08Manuel_Delgado.html.
Durkheim, Émile (2003 [1912]). “Definición del fenómeno religioso y de la religión”. In: Las formas elementales de la vida religiosa. Alianza, pp. 57-93.
Godelier, Maurice (2000 [1972]). “Lo visible y lo invisible en los baruya de Nueva Guinea”. In: Economía, fetichismo y religión en las sociedades primitivas. Siglo XXI. pp. 355-365.
Geertz, Clifford (1987 [1973]). “Ritual y cambio social: un ejemplo javanés”. In: La interpretación de las culturas. Gedisa, p. 131-151.
Symbolism Thematic Block
Douglas, Mary (1991 [1966]). “La profanación secular”. In: Pureza y peligro. Un análisis de los conceptos de contaminación y tabú. Siglo XXI, pp. 27-41.
Durkheim, Émile & Mauss, Marcel (1969 [1903]). “Sobre algunas formas primitivas de clasificación. Contribución al estudio de las representaciones colectivas”. In: Durkheim E. (1996). Clasificaciones primitivas (y otros ensayos de antropología positiva). Ariel, pp. 25-103.
Turner, Victor (1980 [1967]). “Símbolos en el ritual Ndembu”. In: La selva de los símbolos. Aspectos del ritual Ndembu. Siglo XXI, pp. 21-52.
Myth Thematic Block
Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1971 [1962]). “La ciència del concret”. In: El pensament salvatge. Ed. 62, pp. 19-50.
Bidou, Paul (1989 [1979]). “A propósito del incesto y de la muerte. Un mito de los indios tatuyo del noroeste de la Amazonia". In: M. Izard M. & P. Smith (eds.) La función simbólica. Júcar, pp.113-145.
Ritual Thematic Block
Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1987 [1958]). “La eficacia simbólica”. In: Antropología Estructural. Paidós, p. 168-185.
Douglas, Mary (1991 [1966]). “Magia y milagro”. In: Pureza y peligro. Un análisis de los conceptos de contaminación y tabú. Siglo XXI, pp. 61-79.
Turner, Victor (1988 [1969]). “Niveles de clasificación de un ritual de vida y muerte”. In: Proceso ritual. Taurus, p. 13-53.
Christian, William (1995). "La devoció a les imatges brunes a Catalunya. La Mare de Déu de Montserrat". Revista d'Etnologia de Catalunya, 6, pp. 24-33.
Recommended general bibliography (atthe beginning of the course in the Virtual Campus there will be an extensive bibliography by topics)
Balandier, Georges (1994 [1992]). El poder en escenas. De la representación del poder al poder de la representación. Paidós.
Cantón Delgado, Manuela (2001). La razón hechizada. Teorías antropológicas de la religión. Ariel.
Díaz Cruz, Rodrigo (1998). Archipiélagos de rituales. Teorías antropológicas del ritual. Anthropos.
Douglas, Mary (1991 [1966]). Pureza y peligro. Un análisis de los conceptos de contaminación y tabú. Siglo XXI.
Geertz, Clifford (1987 [1973]). La interpretación de las culturas. Gedisa.
Gledhill, John (2000 [1999]). El poder y sus disfraces. Edicions Bellaterra.
Izard, Michel & Smith, Pierre (eds.) (1989 [1979]). La función simbólica. Júcar.
Leach, Edmund (1978 [1976]). Cultura y comunicación. La lógica de la conexión de los símbolos. Siglo XXI.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1987 [1958]). Antropología estructural. Paidós.
Morris, Brian (1995 [1987]). Introducción al estudio antropológico de la religión. Paidós.
Sperber, Dan (1980 [1974]). El simbolismo en general. Anthropos.
Turner, Victor (1990 [1967]). La selva de los símbolos. Siglo XXI.
Turner, Victor (1988 [1969]). El proceso ritual. Estructura y antiestructura. Taurus.
Vallverdú, Jaume (2008). Antropología simbólica. Teoría y etnografía sobre religión, simbolismo y ritual. UOC.
Waal Malefijt, Annemarie de (1975). Introducción a la antropologíareligiosa. Verbo Divino.
Word processor (Word type). PowerPoint.
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 1 | Catalan/Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 1 | Catalan/Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |