Assessment
Continous Assessment Activities
Title |
Weighting |
Hours |
ECTS |
Learning Outcomes |
Final work (in group). Reflection, analysis and proposal definition concept 'family' |
30% |
12
|
0.48 |
KM15, KM16, KM17, SM20, SM21
|
Participation in the discussions documentary view and comment delivery |
15% |
6
|
0.24 |
KM16, KM17, SM19, SM20, SM21
|
Read Dossier Files |
15% |
20
|
0.8 |
CM13, KM13, KM14, SM19, SM21
|
Written test on basic concepts |
40% |
2
|
0.08 |
KM13, KM14, KM15, KM17, SM19, SM21
|
Module 1: essay
Final project (group activity). 30%. Reflection and proposal definition of 'family' based on analyzing a family domestic unit. The lecturer will detail the submission format in the first session and render the information on the Virtual Campus.
Dossier Files and deliver comment question raised. Activity that can be done in a group. 15%
Module 2: Participation
Participation and delivery of evidence from materials worked on in the classroom. 15%. This module cannot be reassessed.
Module 3: Written Test
Written test on basic concepts. 40%.
The lecturer will present learning activities and course calendars in the first session and will be available on the Virtual Campus so that students can access them.
Students who do NOT present the result of module 1 or module 3 on the due dates will be considered NOT ASSESSED.
To PASS the subject, the student must pass modules 1 and 3. The minimum grade to pass each of them is a "5".
Procedure for REVIEWING grades: At the time of each assessment activity, the teacher will inform the students (Moodle) of the procedure and date to grade reviewing.
Reassessment: If reassessment was needed, students must have been previously graded in modules 1 and 3.
The module 2 cannot be reassessed.
AI TECHNOLOGIES: This subject allows the use of AI technologies exclusively for support tasks such as bibliographic or content-based searches an dtext correction.
The student must clearly (i) identify which parts have been generated using AI technology; (ii) specify the tools used; and (iii) include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and final outcome of the activity.
Lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in the assessed activity will be considered academic dishonesty; the corresponding grade may be lowered, or the work may even be awarded a zero. In cases of greater infringement, more serious action may be taken.
If the student performs any irregularity (plagiarism, academic fraud due to unauthorized use of AI tools, etc.) that may lead to a significant variation in the grade of an assessment act, this assessment act will be graded with a zero (0), regardless of the disciplinary process that may be instructed. In the event that there were several irregularities in the assessment of the same subject, the final grade of this subject will be zero (0).
SINGLE ASSESSMENT (SA)
On the single assessment date, students who take advantage of the single assessment must complete the following tests:
-30% Reflection and proposal definition of the concept of 'family' based on the analysis of a family domestic unit different from one's own, completing all the parts of the work according to the script provided by the lecturer
-20% Work on the material given to the student at the beginning of the test, following the guidelines that the lecturer will provide.
-50% Exam on basic course concepts.
Length:
These tests may exceed 4 hours so that they may be scheduled outside the usual teaching slot.
Procedure for grade reviewing:
At the time of each assessment activity, the teacher will inform the students (Moodle) of the procedure and the date of review of the grades.
Consideration of "Not assessed":
Students who do not complete tests 1 and 3 on the day and time established as the single evaluation test will be NOT ASSESSED.
Reassessment (SA):
To be reassessed, students must submit all the planned tests.
Plagiarism/irregularities/AI (AU):
The same actions apply as in the case of continuous evaluation.
Bibliography
To ensure their availability, the final list of compulsory materials will be posted on the Virtual Campus on the first day of the course.
DOSSIER 'Course readings'
Topic 3- The control of sexuality and the cultural construction of descent
Malinowski, Bronislaw (1927). "Kinship and descent in a Matrilineal Society" (pp: 8-16), in the Father in Primitive Psychology, London: Routledge. Vol 5. Accessible via Google Books.
Topic 4 - Filiation, Descent and Kinship
San Román, Teresa.; González Aurora; Grau, Jorge (2003) 'Los grupos de filiación' in Las relaciones de parentesco. Bellaterra: Publicacions d'Antropologia Cultural, núm. 23, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,
Servei de Publicacions. Pp. 75-96.
https://bibcercador.uab.cat/permalink/34CSUC_UAB/avjcib/alma991002185659706709
Topic 5 - Exogamy, Marriage and Kinship
Goody, Jack (2007[1969]). "Herencia, propiedad y matrimonio en África y Eurasia", (pp. 211-224) in Parkin, R. & Stone, L. Antropología del parentesco y de la familia. Madrid: Editorial Universitaria. Ramón Areces.
https://bibcercador.uab.cat/permalink/34CSUC_UAB/1eqfv2p/alma991001826429706709
Topic 6 - The Domestic Unit in Traditional Societies
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. (1984). "La Familia" in Lévi-Strauss, Claude.; Spiro, Melford. y Gough, Kathleen. (pp. 7-49) Polémica sobre el origen y la universalidad de la Familia. Barcelona: Anagrama. 4ª ed.
https://bibcercador.uab.cat/permalink/34CSUC_UAB/1eqfv2p/alma991004142419706709
Topic 7 - Household changes in Europe.
Roigé, Xavier. (1996). "De la familia troncal a las nuevas familias. Continuidades y cambios en la familia catalana", in Roigé, Xavier. (Ed.) Familias de ayer, familias de hoy. Continuidades y cambios en Cataluña.
Barcelona: Icària. Pp: 9-23.
https://bibcercador.uab.cat/permalink/34CSUC_UAB/1eqfv2p/alma991001826859706709
Topic 8 - Gender, Economy and Social Organization in the field of Kinship
Moore, Henrietta. (1991). "Parentesco, trabajo y hogar: comprender la labor de la mujer", (pp: 59-95), in Antropología y feminismo. Madrid: Cátedra.
https://bibcercador.uab.cat/permalink/34CSUC_UAB/1eqfv2p/alma991001826859706709
BIBLIOGRAPHY. Further reading
Aixelà, Yolanda. (2000). Mujeres en Marruecos. Un análisis desde el parentesco y el género. Barcelona: Edicions Bellaterra. Colección Alborán.
Barrera, Antonio. (1990). Clase, herencia y familia en la Cataluña rural. Madrid: Alianza Universidad. Ed. Alianza.
Beattie, John H. M. (1972). Otras Culturas. México: F.C.E.
Bestard, Joan. (1998). Parentesco y modernidad. Barcelona, Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Bott, Elizabeth. (1990). (1975) Familia y red social. Barcelona: Taurus.
Buchler, Ira. (1982). Estudios de Parentesco. Barcelona: Anagrama. Col. Panorama de la Antropología Cultural Contemporánea. Núm. 5.
Collier, Jane F.; Yanagisako, Sylvia J. (eds.). (1987). Gender and kinship. Essays toward a unified analysis. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Del Valle, Teresa (Ed). (1993). Gendered Anthropology. Londres: Routledge.
Dumont, Louis. (1975). Introducción a dos teorías de la Antropología Social. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Firth, Raymond. (et al.). (1970). Families and their relatives. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Fox, Robin. (1980). Sistemas de parentesco y matrimonio. Madrid: Alianza Universidad.
González Echevarría, Aurora; San Román, Teresa; Grau Rebollo, Jorge. (2003). Las relaciones de parentesco. Bellaterra: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. Serie Materiales.
González Echevarría, Aurora. (et al.). (2010). "Sobre la definición de los dominios transculturales. La Antropología del Parentesco como teoría sociocultural de la procreación", Alteridades, v. 20, n. 39, pp. 93-106.
Goody, Jack. (1986). La evolución de la familia y del matrimonio en Europa. Barcelona: Editorial Herder.
Grau Rebolo, Jorge. (2018) "Familia", (pp: 233 - 237) in Aguirre Baztán, Ángel. (2018). Diccionario temático de antropología cultural / Ángel Aguirre Baztán (editor) (Primera edición). Delta Publicaciones. Versió electrònica
(via UAB): https://elibro.net/es/ereader/uab/227442. Permalink:
https://bibcercador.uab.cat/permalink/34CSUC_UAB/1eqfv2p/alma991009928789706709
Grau Rebollo, Jorge. (2002). La familia en la pantalla. Oviedo: Septem Ediciones.
Grau Rebollo, Jorge; Rodríguez García, Dan; Valenzuela, Hugo. (eds.). (2011). ParentescoS: modelos culturales de reproducción. Barcelona: PPU.
Harris, Marvin. (1987). Introducción a la Antropología general. Madrid: Alianza. Capítulos 13 "La organización de la vida doméstica" y 14 "Parentesco, residencia y filiación".
Laslett, Peter. (1972). Household and Family in Past Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. (1972). El futuro de los estudios del parentesco. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. (1973). Las estructuras elementales del parentesco. Barcelona, Buenos Aires: Paidós. 3ª reimpresión (1a. edición 1949).
Malinowski, Bronislaw. (1969). Sexe i repressió en les societats primitives. Barcelona: Edicions 62.
Malinowski, Bronislaw. (1970). Estudios de psicología primitiva. Buenos Aires, Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós.
Mead, Margaret. (1983). Sexe i Temperament en tres Societats Primitives. Barcelona: Edicions 62. Edición original de 1935.
Meillassoux, Claude. (1977). Mujeres, graneros y capitales. Barcelona, Madrid: Siglo XXI. 8ª Edición.
Murdock, George P. (1967). Ethnographic Atlas. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Needham, Rodney. (1971). Rethinking Kinship and Marriage. Londres: Tabistock.
Parkin, Robert; Stone, Linda. (2006). Antropología del parentesco y de la familia. Madrid: Editorial Centro de Estudios Ramón Areces.
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R.; Forde, Daryll. (eds.). (1982). Sistemas africanos de parentesco y matrimonio. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Roigé Ventura, Xavier (Coord.). (2006). Familias de ayer, familias de hoy. Continuidades y cambios en Cataluña. Barcelona: Icària.
Roigé, Xavier; García, Ana; Mascarell, Montserrat. (eds.). (1994). Antropología del Parentiu. Barcelona: Icària.
Sahlins, Marshall. (2011). "What Kinship is (part one)" and "What Kinship is (part two)", Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17, pp. 2-19, pp. 227-242.
Segalen, Martine. (1992). Antropología histórica de la familia. Madrid: Taurus Universitaria. Primera parte: el espacio del parentesco. Pp. 37-97.
Schneider, David M. (1968). American Kinship. A Cultural Account. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Stone, Linda (Ed). (2001). New Directions in Anthropological Kinship. Nueva York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.
Yanagisako, Sylvia. (2015). Kinship. HAU Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 5(1), 489-494.
https://doi.org/10.14318/hau5.1.023