Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
English and French Studies | OT | 0 |
English and French Studies | OT | 3 |
English and French Studies | OT | 4 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Not applicable.
The aim of this course is to introduce students to the theoretical and practical foundations of applying linguistics to the teaching of French as a foreign language. The processes of acquiring and learning French will be analyzed from various perspectives—sociolinguistic, psycholinguistic, and pragmatic—taking into account the roles of teaching staff, learners, and the broader educational context. The course also explores how linguistic knowledge can be translated into inclusive and practical pedagogical approaches. Students will engage with a variety of teaching materials and reflect on the planning and implementation of communicative tasks. The course provides tools for designing effective and adaptable learning activities that are responsive to the diverse needs of learners.
1. Theoretical Foundations in Language Didactics
2. Methodological Currents and Approaches in Foreign Language Teaching
3. The role of teaching staff and learners in the learning process
4. Organization and Management of Language Teaching
5. Development of Language Skills and Learning Contexts
6. Assessment in Language Didactics
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Analysis, evaluation and discussion of written documents and audiovisual documents in the French language | 65 | 2.6 | 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 14, 11, 25, 17, 16, 19, 20, 22, 28, 30 |
Master class with ICT support and collective discussion | 20 | 0.8 | 3, 8, 9, 14, 11, 25, 17, 16, 15, 18, 20, 22, 27, 28, 30 |
Oral presentations in individual and group classes | 9 | 0.36 | 2, 1, 3, 7, 6, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 12, 26, 25, 23, 17, 16, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 |
Performing in class of individual and group activities | 15 | 0.6 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 6, 8, 9, 14, 11, 23, 17, 16, 15, 19, 21, 27, 28, 29, 31 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Class observation | 6.5 | 0.26 | 4, 5, 10, 13, 26, 20, 21, 22, 24, 31 |
Supervising oral and written productions | 11 | 0.44 | 9, 11, 25, 23, 29, 30 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Independent study | 20 | 0.8 | 4, 5, 8, 10, 13, 26, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 29, 30, 31 |
This subject is both theoretical and practical and requires the active participation of all learners.
Teaching methodologies will include Challenge-Based Learning (CBL), flipped classroom, game-based learning, lectures supported by ICT, collective discussions, comprehensive reading of texts, completion of individual and group exercises, as well as the development of autonomous learning activities.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Final oral test. | 25% | 0.5 | 0.02 | 2, 1, 6, 8, 9, 25, 23, 17, 16, 15, 18, 19, 27, 28, 29, 30 |
Final written test. | 25% | 1.5 | 0.06 | 2, 1, 3, 6, 9, 25, 23, 17, 19, 20, 28, 29, 30 |
Practical activities proposed in class or on the virtual campus. | 20% | 0.5 | 0.02 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 6, 8, 9, 14, 11, 23, 17, 16, 15, 19, 21, 27, 28, 29, 31 |
Submission and in-class presentation of an academic assignment. | 30% | 1 | 0.04 | 2, 1, 3, 7, 6, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 11, 12, 26, 25, 23, 17, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 30, 31 |
Final Grade
50% of the final grade corresponds to continuous assessment carried out throughout the course. The remaining 50% corresponds to final exams: 25% written final exam and 25% oral final exam.
Review
On carrying out each evaluation activity, lecturers will inform students (on Moodle) of the procedures to be followed for reviewing all grades awarded, and the date on which such a review will take place.
Consideration of "Not Assessable"
Students will obtain a Not assessed/Not submitted course grade unless they have submitted more than 30% of the assessment items (i.e., fewer than 30% of the assigned tasks throughout the course and participation in fewer than 30% of the mandatory tests). Therefore, if learners have completed more than 30% of each component, they will be assessed. If they have not submitted at least 70% of all required assignments (including the final written exam, final oral exam, and oral presentation), the final grade will be a fail.
Resit/Remedial Assessment
Learners who have failed the course may only take part in the resit if they have been assessed in a set of activities that represent at least two-thirds of the final grade. The resit will consist of a final oral exam (40%), submission of a written assignment (20%), and a final written exam (40%). Tasks related to class participation, in-class exercises and oral presentations are excluded from the resit. Any assessment activity in which irregularities have occurred (e.g., plagiarism, improperuse of AI, etc.) will not be eligible for resit. To pass the course, learners must pass both components: continuous assessment and final exams. The minimum grade required to be eligible for the resit is 3.5 out of 10.
When the final grade is communicated (prior to official submission), the teaching staff will provide written information about the resit process. They may propose a separate resit activity for each failed or missing assignment, or combine several into a single task.
Plagiarism
In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
This subject allows the use of AI technologies exclusively for support tasks such as content-based searches. The student must clearly 1) identify which parts have been generated using AI technology; 2) specify the tools used; and 3) include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and final outcome of the activity. Lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in the assessed activity will be considered academic dishonesty; the corresponding grade may be lowered, or the work may even be awarded a zero. In cases of greater infringement, more serious action may be taken.
Specific Cases
Francophone learners must meet the same assessment conditions as the rest of the class. Responsibilityfor keeping up with learning and assessment activities lies entirely with each learner.
Single Assessment Option
The same assessment method as continuous assessment will be used:
REFERENCE WORKS
Bertocchini, Paola, Costanzo, Edvige et Puren, Christian (2024). Se former en didactique des langues. Éditions Ellipses.
Chomsky, Noam (1979). Structures syntaxiques. Éditions du Seuil, collection Points Essais.
Cuq, Jean-Pierre et Gruca, Isabelle (2017). Cours de didactique du français langue étrangère et seconde. Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Porquier, Rémy et Py, Bernard (2004). Apprentissage d’une langue étrangère : contextes et discours. Éditions Didier.
RECOMMENDED WORKS
Astolfi, Jean-Pierre (1991). L’erreur, un outil pour enseigner. ESF éditeurs. Collection Pratiques et enjeux pédagogiques nº 8.
Bailly, Bernard et Kahler, Thierry (1999). Enseigner, une affaire de personnalité. Nathan.
Beacco, Jean-Claude et Bouquet, Sylvie (2002). Théories linguistiques et enseignement du FLE. Coll. Recherches et Applications. Le Français dans le Monde. Clé International.
Bérard, Éric (1991). L’approchecommunicative, Théorie et pratiques. Clé international.
Besse, Henri et Porquier, Robert (1984). Grammaire et didactique des langues. Hatier. (Coll. LAL).
Besse, Henri (1985). Méthodes et pratiques des manuels de langue. Didier. Hatier.
Bogaards, Paul (1988). Aptitude et affectivité dans l’apprentissage des langues étrangères. Hatier. (Coll. LAL).
Boyer, Henri, Butzbach, Michel et Pendanx, Michel (1990). Nouvelle introduction à la didactique du français langue étrangère. Clé International.
Bufe, Wolfgang et Giessen, Hans-Werner (2003). Des langues et des médias. Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Carton, François (2001). Oral : variabilité et apprentissages. Le Français dans le monde. Recherches et applications. Numéro spécial. Clé International.
Chalvin, Marie-Josée (2000). Deux cerveaux pour la classe. Nathan.
Champagne-Muzar, Claire et Bourdages, Jean-Sébastien (2001). Le point sur la phonétique. Collection Outils. Didactique des Langues Étrangères. Clé International.
Cornaire, Claude (2001). La compréhension orale. Clé International. Collection Didactique des langues étrangères.
Cornaire, Claude et Raymond, Pierre-Marc (2001). La production écrite. Clé International. Collection Didactique des langues étrangères.
Courtillon, Jacques (2005). Élaborer un cours de FLE. F Nouvelle formule. Hachette.
Cuq, Jean-Pierre (2003). Une introduction à la didactique de la grammaire du français langue étrangère. Collection Didactique du français. Didier.
Cyr, Pierre et Germain, Claude (2001). Les stratégies d’apprentissage. Collection Outils. Didactique des langues étrangères. Clé International.
Dabène, Louis (1991). Repères sociolinguistiques pour l’enseignement du français. Collection F. Références. Hachette.
De Carlo, Michel (1992). L’interculturel. Clé International. Collection Didactique des langues étrangères.
Demongin, François et Dumont, Pierre (1999). Cinéma et chanson : pour enseigner le français autrement. CRDP Midi Pyrénées.
De la Garanderie, André (1984). Les profils pédagogiques. Le Centurion.
Develay, Michel (1991). Peut-on former les enseignants ?. ESF éditeurs. Collection Pédagogies.
Duda, Robert et Riley, Peter (1990). Learning styles. Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
Dufeu, Bernard (1996). Les approches non-conventionnelles. Collection F. Références. Hachette.
Evano, Claude (2000). La gestion mentale. Nathan.
Gadenne, Jean-Étienne et Sotivakis, Bernard (2003). J'enseigne avec l'internet en français-lettres. CRDP de Bretagne.
Gaonac’h, Denis (1987). Théories d’apprentissage et acquisition d’une langue étrangère.Hatier. (Coll. LAL).
Godard, Éric, Liria, Pierre, Mistichelli, Michel et Sigé, Jean-Pierre (2006). Les clés du nouveau DELF. Niveaux A1, A2, B1 et B2. Presses Universitairesde Grenoble.
Gajo, Laurent, Matthey, Michel, Moore, David et Serra, Claude (2005). Un parcours au contact des langues. Didier-Hatier.
Germain, Claude (1993). Évolution de l’enseignement des langues : 5 000 ans d’histoire. Clé International.
Germain, Claude et Seguin, Henri (2001). Le point sur la grammaire. Collection Outils. Didactique des Langues Étrangères. Clé International.
Guyot-Clément, Catherine, Penfornis, Jean-Luc et Le Fort, Pierre (2003). Les 500 sites Internet. Belin.
Holec, Henri (1989). Implications de l’apprentissage autodirigé. EnAutonomie et enseignement / apprentissage des langues étrangères. Didier-Hatier. pp. 115-119.
Holec, Henri (1992). Apprendre à apprendre et apprentissage auto-dirigé.Nº spécial, Recherches et Applications. Revue Le français dans le monde.
Intravaia, Pierre (2003). Formation des professeurs de langue en phonétique corrective. Le système verbo-tonal. Ed. du CIPA.
Kramsch, Claire (1984). Interaction et discours dans la classe de langue. Hatier. (Coll. LAL).
Lamailloux, Pierre, Arnaud, Marie-Hélène et Jeannard, Robert (1993). Fabriquer des exercices de français. Hachetteéducation.
Lepineux, Robert et Soleilhac, Nicolas (1998). La programmation neuro-linguistique. Nathan.
Lussier, Daniel (1992). Évaluer les apprentissages dans une approche communicative. Hachette.
Moirand, Sylvie (1982). Enseigner à communiquer en langue étrangère. Hachette.
Moirand, Sylvie (1995). Enseigner l’oral en interaction. Hachette.
Mucchielli, Raymond. Méthodes actives dans la pédagogie des adultes. ESF éditeurs. Collection : Formation permanente.
Perdue, Charles (1980). L’analyse des erreurs : un bilan pratique. Dans : Langages nº 57.
Poisson-Quinton, Sylvie et Mimran, René ; Malhéo-Le Coadic, Monique (2002). Grammaire expliquée du français. Clé International.
Porcher, Luc (2004). Le français langue étrangère : émergence et enseignement d’une discipline. Hachette.
Puren, Christian (1988). Histoire des méthodologies de l’enseignement des langues. Clé International. Nathan.
Renard, René (1992). Variations sur la problématique SGAV. Essais de didactique des langues. Didier Érudition. C.I.P.A.
Richterich, René (1985). Besoins langagiers et objectifs d’apprentissage. Hachette.
Roesch, Robert et Rolle-Harold, Ruth (2006). Cinq sur cinq. Évaluation à la compréhension orale au niveau B2. Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Roulet, Eric (1980). Langue maternelle et langues secondes : vers une pédagogie intégrée. Hatier. (Coll. LAL).
Salins, Gérard-Denis (1992). Une introduction à l’ethnographie de la communication pour la formation à l’enseignement du FLE. Didier.
Schiffler, Laurence (1984). Pour un enseignement interactif des langues étrangères. Hatier. (Coll. LAL).
Tagliante, Claire (1994). La classe de langue. Clé International.
Tomassone, Robert (2005). Grands repères culturels pour une langue : le français. Hachette.
Trankiem, Bernard (1997). Stress, attention, action. Nathan.
Trocmé-Fabre, Hélène (1992). Le savoir-apprendre. Se Former +.
Vanoye, Françoise et Mouchoa, Jacques ; Sarrazar, Jean-Pierre (1981). Pratiques de l’oral. Coll. U.
Veltcheff, Claire et Hilton, Stephen (2005). L’évaluation en FLE. Collection F nouvelle formule. Hachette.
Vicher, Anne (2002). Grammaire progressive du français pour adolescents. Niveau débutants et intermédiaires. Clé International.
Vigner, Gérard (2001). Enseigner le français comme langue étrangère. Collection Outils. Didactique des Langues Étrangères. Clé International.
Vigner, Gérard (2005). La grammaire en FLE. Collection Fnouvelle formule. Hachette.
Williams, Michael et Burden, Robert (1999). Psicología para profesores de idiomas. Cambridge.
Zarate, Gabrielle (1993). Représentations de l’étranger et didactique des langues. Collection. Essais,Crédif-Didier.
Browser and text editor.
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 1 | French | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 1 | French | second semester | morning-mixed |