Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
Evaluation of classroom pratices through case studies and problem solving	25%	2	0.08	3, 7, 5, 9, 8
Written evaluation through objective tests (1st part): multiple choice	37,5%	1	0.04	1, 2, 7, 6
Written evaluation through objective tests (2nd part): multiple choice	37,5%	1	0.04	1, 3, 4, 7, 6

Competencies will be assessed through a final, formative and continuous assessment. The grading system will be alpha-numeric.

Theory

Written assessment through objective tests. The written objective tests will cover theoretical material and will be organized into 2 parts with multiple-choice questions. They will have a specific weight of 75% on the final grade of the subject.

Classroom practices:

Assessment of solving problems of calculating drug doses. They will have a specific weight of 10% on the final grade of the subject.

Assessment of group work on discussion and case solutions. Oral defense of group work and/or synthesis of the topics worked on in the classroom. They will have a specific weight of 15% on the final grade of the subject.

Attendance at classroom practices: it will be necessary to attend at least 70% to pass the subject. Non-attendance must be justified

In outline, it will be evaluated as follows:

- Theory

Two partial tests: numerical grade between 0-10, each of the tests will represent 37.5% of the final grade. The first test will be held during the month of November and the second once the subject has been completed.

Final remedial test: writtentest type test in the event of not having cleared the subject in the two partial tests. Numerical grade between 0-10 (75% of the final grade).

- Classroom practices

Solution of dose calculation problems: numerical grade between 0-10 (10% of the final grade).

Group work: numerical grade between 0-10 (15% of the final grade).

In the classroom practices of this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed exclusively in support tasks, such as bibliographic or information searches for the correct development of the assigned tasks. The student must clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The lack of transparency of the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a partial or total penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in serious cases

To pass the subject:

You must have a score of 5 or more in each of the 2 partials and a score of 5 or more in the dose calculation test and 5 or more in the group work of the classroom practices.

To participate in the recovery, the student must have previously been evaluated in a set of activities whose weight is equivalent to a minimum of 62% of the total grade of the subject.

Definition of NOT EVALUABLE: it will be understood as not assessable when:

- the student does not take the written objective tests of multiple-choice questions

- the student misses more than 30% of the classroom practices without justification.

Exam review: Written tests may be reviewed during the period determined for this purpose, once the final grade has been published. Requests for review on dates outside the established limit will not be accepted.

Treatment of any particular cases: an evaluation committee will meet to treat these cases.