The methodology will consist of lectures with explanations of the theoretical programme, which students must have read in advance the materials uploaded to the campus in order to make the most of interactive sessions, 
jointly alternated with the viewing of practical cases; as well as practical classes with case exposure and presentation of various exploration tests.
 

The training activities will be focused on real cases that will have to be evaluated from the observation of video material and the results obtained in tests, applying theoretical knowledge. 

Students will have to carry out the administration of a large evaluation test of a subject and to make the presentation of the corresponding pass, correction and interpretation in class.

Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
Ev. 4. Administration of an oral or written language assessment test, interpretation of the results, written submission of the case and oral presentation.	15 %	0	0	CM09, CM10, SM16, SM18
Ev. 1. Multiple choice exam corresponding to topics 1 and 2	35%	1.5	0.06	CM10, KM18, KM19
Ev. 2. Multiple choice exam corresponding to topics 3 and 4	35 %	1.5	0.06	CM10, KM18, KM19
Ev. 3. Collective discussions: collective authorship, oral format, face-to-face (first and second evaluation period). Seminar portfolio	15%	0	0	CM10, KM19, SM15, SM16

Assessment System

The assessment system is organized into four evaluation activities of two different types, ALL OF THEM MANDATORY:

Ev. 1. Multiple-choice exam covering Units 1 and 2 – 35% of the final grade (during the first evaluation period). In-person and individual.
Ev. 2. Multiple-choice exam covering Units 3 and 4 – 35% of the final grade (during the second evaluation period). In-person and individual.
Ev. 3. Collective discussions – 15%. Oral format, collective authorship, in-person. Group portfolio from seminars. This evidence is not subject to resit.
Ev. 4. Administration of an oral or written language assessment, interpretation of results, written case report and oral presentation – 15% of the final grade. In-person and individual.

 

Evidence Code Table

 

A student who submits learning evidence equivalent to less than 4 points (40%) will be recorded as "Not Assessable."

TRANSLATION OF THE IN-PERSON EVALUATION TESTS will be provided only if the requirements in Article 263 are met and the request is submitted during Week 4 via the online form (E-Form). (More information on the Faculty’s website.)

Resit Examination

Students may be eligible for a resit exam if they have not met the criteria to pass the course but have previously been assessed in a set of activities whose weight is equivalent to at least two-thirds of the total grade (Ev. 1, Ev. 2, and Ev. 4).

Students who do not pass Ev. 1 or Ev. 2 with a score equal to or greater than 5 may take the corresponding resit test for the failed activity.
Ev. 3 is not resittable.
The maximum grade a student can earn in a resit exam is 5 out of 10.

Second or later enrollments will not be assessed through a single, non-recoverable synthesis test.

General assessment guidelines:
https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/graus/graus/avaluacions-1345722525858.html

 

Single Assessment Request

The Single Assessment must be requested online (E-Form) within the specific period (more information available on the Faculty website).

The course will be considered passed if all learning evidences are passed with a minimum of 5.0 out of 10.
The final grade will be the weighted average of the evidences, as follows:

 

SINGLE ASSESSMENT – EVIDENCE TABLE

 

Feedback on Evaluation

According to the Faculty's guidelines, this course will provide students with timely feedback on evaluation activities.

Feedback deadlines are as follows:

• Written exams: within one week of completion.
  
  

• Practical assignments: within two weeks of submission.
  
  

 

Specific Guidelines for Practical Sessions and Seminars

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Model 2 – Restricted Use:
For this course, AI technologies are allowed only for support tasks, such as literature or information searches, text correction, translations,and other specific activities (e.g., practical assignments). In these cases, students must clearly identify the AI-generated content, specify the tools used, and include a critical reflection on how these tools influenced the process and final outcome.

Lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in assessable tasks will be considered academic dishonesty and may result in partial or total penalties to the grade or even more severe sanctions in serious cases.

AI tools are strictly prohibited in the collective seminar discussions, as these activities aim to develop critical reasoning and personalized application of acquired knowledge.

 

Attendance to Practical Seminars

Attendance is mandatory.
To be assessed, students must attend at least 80% of the sessions. Any absence must be properly justified with official documentation. Otherwise, the corresponding activity will receive a grade of 0.

Failure to attend 80% of the seminars will result in Ev. 3 being marked as “Not Assessable”, and the course will automatically be considered “Not Passed.”

 

Submission of Practical Assignments

Assignments must be submitted within the established deadlines and formats.
Late or incorrectly formatted submissions will be penalized with a deduction of 2 points from the assignment grade.