Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
Social Education | OT | 3 |
Social Education | OT | 4 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
This subject has no specific prerequisites, although could be interesting have knowledge about the following subjects:
The aims of the course are:
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Master classes by professors of basic and complementary issues, presentation and discussion of the work produced by the students, shared knowledge creation. | 35 | 1.4 | 2, 14, 16, 15, 8, 5, 13, 3 |
Practical case studies, deepening specific issues, classroom debates and discussions. | 10 | 0.4 | 2, 14, 16, 15, 8, 5, 13, 3 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Individual and group tutoring. | 30 | 1.2 | 16, 8 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Text reading, search and analysis of information, class works, practical case studies, assessment activities. | 75 | 3 | 2, 14, 16, 15, 8, 5, 13, 3 |
The methodology will be participative. The student is the main protagonist of the teaching-learning process. Lectures will be complemented with case studies, discussions and classroom exercises.
The course is divided into two inter-connected blocks. The first block is dedicated to specific topics of social health education, contextualization and prioritized social problems. The second block is focused on topics related to mental health.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Exam (block II) | 30 | 0 | 0 | 2, 14, 16, 15, 8, 13 |
Group work (block I) | 30 | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 4, 14, 16, 8, 5, 7, 18, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 3, 17 |
Individual written work (block I) | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 4, 14, 16, 15, 8, 5, 7, 6, 13, 3 |
Individual written work (block II) | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2, 4, 16, 15, 8, 5, 6, 9, 11, 17 |
The course will have a continuous evaluation from evaluated activities of individual and group type. Each block of the course has specific evaluations that, as a whole, add up to 100% of the final grade of the subject.
The time dedicated to the evaluation activities and the autonomous work time are summative, given that many of the training activities that will be proposed to students as autonomous work, will be part of the evaluation of the student.
There is possibility of unique evaluation.
The grade Not evaluable will be assigned to those who do not submit the four evidences foreseen for the evaluation of the subject, which are:
- Part I - Socio-educational intervention in health: Group work (30%) and Individual work (20%).
- Part II - Health, pathologies and care circuit: Exam (30%) and Individual work (20%)
That is, it is mandatory to present and pass with a minimum grade of 5 each of the evidences in order to be evaluated and pass the subject.
|
Continuous evaluation |
Unique evaluation |
Recovery |
|||
Part I: Socio-educational intervention in health (Sara Carbonell) |
Group work (30%) |
April 20 (delivery) |
Individual written work (30%) |
June 15 |
The same for all types of evaluation: suspended parts are evaluated |
Juny 29 |
Individual work (20%) |
April 27 (delivery) |
Individual work (20%) |
||||
Part II: Health, pathologies and care circuit |
Exam (30%) |
June 15 |
Exam (30%) |
|||
Individual work (20%) |
June 1 (delivery) |
Individual work (20%) |
The content and format of each evaluation will be informed during the beginning of each block of the subject.
In case of not passing the subject in the official call, a recovery exam will be taken at the end of the course. The plagiarism or copying of any of the evaluation activities is a reason for failure of the course, as well as the fraudulent use of generative AI tools. In this regard, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is restricted exclusively to support tasks, such as bibliographic or information search, proofreading or translations from other languages. The student should clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify their undertakings and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. Non-transparency of the AI in this evaluable activity will be considered academic dishonesty and may result in a partial or total penalty in the grade of the activity, or higher penalties in serious cases.
The return of the marks of the works and of the written test (examination) will be maximum between 15 and 20 days after the delivery.
In this course, students with second enrollment are not allowed to take the Synthesis Test.
Communicative competence: To pass this subject, the student needs to show good general communicative competence, both orally and in writing, and a good command of the language or vehicular languages listed in the teaching guide. In all activities (individual and group), linguistic correction, writing and formal aspects of presentation will therefore be taken into account. Students must be able to express themselves fluently and correctly and must show a high degree of understanding of academic texts. An activity can be returned (not evaluated) or suspended if the teacher considers that it does not meet these requirements.
Bibliography
Esteban, M. L., Comelles, J. M., Díez Mintegui C. (2010). Antropología, género, salud y
atención. Barcelona: Bellaterra.
Soberania Sanitaria. (2019). Salud feminista. Soberanía de los cuerpos, poder y organización.
Buenos Aires: Tinta limón.
Enllaços
If virtual teaching is needed, Microsoft TEAMS will be used
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TE) Theory | 3 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |