Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
Political Science and Public Management | OB | 3 |
International Relations | OB | 3 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
The student is expected to know adequately, at a minimum, the concepts and theories worked in the Political Science subject of the first of the degree. It is also taken for granted that the student routinely reads generalist newspapers following especially the news of national and international politics Group G1 will be taught in English and a good level of active and passive comprehension in English is expected (see objectives). The afternoon classes (G51) will be taught in Spanish / Catalan and a good level of reading in English is expected. Exams can be delivered in Catalan, Spanish, or English. Practices in English classes will be conducted in English.
This subject is compulsory in the third year of Degree and Political Science and Public Management. The course aims to work on some of the main approaches, concepts and theories of comparative politics through an in-depth analysis of the most relevant Western European political systems. G1 is completely in English to give students an opportunity to consolidate an English level that allows them to follow and participate in English subjects both at the UAB and in international exchange programs. It is expected to conduct classes with an active understanding of English, that is, seminary discussions will be conducted in English. Written evaluation work and the exam can be done in English, Catalan or Spanish. The oral presentation will be in English and the level is expected to allow a correct and fluent oral expression
NOTE: FOR A MORE UP TO DATE DESCRIPTION OF COURSE CONTENT PLEASE SEE SYLLABUS AVAILABLE IN MOODLE AT THE BEGINNING OF THE COURSE
PART I: INTRODUCTION
TOPIC 1 - Introduction to Comparative Politics
Topic 2: The logics of the comparative method.
Topic 3: introduction to institutions and key concepts in comparative politics
PART II: POLITICAL SYSTEMS
Topic 4: historical antecedents and constitutions (UK, Germany, France and Italy)
Topic 5: Electoral systems and party systems
Topic 6: Legislatures and governments
Topic 7: Territorial distribution, federalism and decentralization
PART III: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF QUALITY OF DEMOCRACY AND PUBLIC POLICY OF DIFFERENT REGIMES
TOpic 8. Majoritarian and Consensual democratic models
Topic 9: Vetoplayers
Topic 10: Policy outcomes of different political systems
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lectures | 30 | 1.2 | 5 |
Oral presentations | 8 | 0.32 | 6, 19, 20, 25 |
Seminars | 16 | 0.64 | 3, 8, 7, 16, 5 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Office hours | 14 | 0.56 | |
Type: Autonomous | |||
individual study | 30 | 1.2 | 18, 15, 23, 26, 28 |
Reading | 35 | 1.4 | 26 |
Writing | 15 | 0.6 | 3, 8, 15, 5, 23 |
Comparative politics 1 is a 6 ECTS credit course, this means 150 hours of student work in total (25 horas/1 ECTS). These credits are organised around the following activities
Directed activities:
Supervised activities:
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Essay | 30% | 0 | 0 | 1, 24, 4, 2, 3, 8, 7, 6, 10, 9, 11, 19, 18, 13, 14, 15, 12, 16, 17, 20, 22, 21, 5, 23, 27, 26, 28, 25 |
Evaluation of seminar tasks | 20% | 0 | 0 | 1, 24, 4, 2, 8, 6, 10, 9, 11, 18, 12, 16, 17, 20, 22, 21, 5, 23, 26, 28 |
Exam | 50% | 2 | 0.08 | 2, 3, 8, 7, 6, 11, 18, 13, 14, 15, 16, 20, 5, 23, 26 |
Evaluation is divided in 3 main elements:
Resit
-If the exam, the group work or both do not obtain a pass (5 or above) the student will be able to retake either one part or both. Important points:
- The coursework in seminars (reading tests or similar) cannot be retaken
-The resit could be partial (just one of the parts) or complete(both parts)
- The maxim grade for the resit is a pass (5)
- in order to take the resit the student must have first taken the ordinary exam and submit the group work on time (justified absences for medical reasons apply)
Unique evaluation:
Written exam (100% of the grade). This exam will have one part common to the normal evaluation and a second part which will be essay-based and will relate to the contents covered in seminars and in the practical course work
Non-Evaluation:
This condition will only apply to students who have not taken the exam and have not done the group work either. With a single grade in one of these evaluations, it is no longer possible to access the condition of not assessed.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI). -
It is allowed to use AI in this course as an integral part of the development of the work, provided that the final result reflects a significant contribution of the student in the analysis and personal reflection. The student will have to clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. Non-transparency in the use of AI will be considered academic dishonesty and may lead to a penalty in the course grade, or greater sanctions in cases of severe misuse.
Core Reading: Lijphart, A., Patterns of Democracy, Yale: Yale University Press, 1999.
Colomer, J. M. (Ed.) Comparative European Politics, third Edition, London: Routledge, 2008.
Caramani, D. (eds.) Comparative Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008,
Bara, Judith, Mark pennington 2009 Comparative Politics, Sage
Bale, T. European politics: a comparative introduction, 2nd Edition, London: Palgrave, 2008
Levis, M. (1997) Consent, Dissent and Patriotism, Cambridge University Press
Landman, T., Issues and methods in Comparative Politics: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 2003.
Mona Lena Krook, Joni Lovenduski and Judith Squires (2009). Gender Quotas and Models of Political Citizenship. British Journal of Political Science, 39, pp 781-803
Pasquino, G., Sistemas políticos comparados, Buenos Aires, prometo libros, 2004.
Poguntke, Thomas y Paul Webb (eds): The presidentialization of politics. A comparative study of modern democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Tsebelis, G. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2002.
Not specified
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 1 | English | first semester | morning-mixed |
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 51 | Catalan | first semester | afternoon |
(SEM) Seminars | 1 | English | first semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 10 | English | first semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 51 | Catalan | first semester | afternoon |
(SEM) Seminars | 510 | Catalan | first semester | afternoon |
(TE) Theory | 1 | English | first semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 51 | Catalan | first semester | afternoon |