Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
Archaeology | OT | 4 |
History | OT | 4 |
Ancient Studies | OT | 4 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
There are no specific prerequisites. However, it is advisable to have completed the compulsory Ancient History courses for each degree program.
In this course, we will explore Ancient History from a military perspective, analyzing the fundamental characteristics of war, its impact on societies, and the historiographical debates it has sparked. We will also examine how different state entities managed relationships in contexts of contact and conflict. Special focus will be given to the Ancient Near East, Egypt, Greece, and Rome, reflecting on the dynamics of imperialism and the role of warfare in shaping the ancient world.
Throughout all course topics, special attention will be paid to the so-called forgotten voices of history—such as women, children, foreigners, enslaved people, and other groups often marginalized or rendered invisible in traditional narratives of war and power. This critical approach will help broaden our understanding of warfare and imperial phenomena through diverse and complementary social perspectives.
War and Imperialism in Antiquity: Theoretical and Methodological Framework
Conflict and Expansion in the Ancient Near East
Military Strategies and Pharaohic Power in Ancient Egypt
Warfare in the Greek World: Between the Polis and the Empire
Violence, Conquest, and Control in the Roman World
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Theoretical classes and seminars | 41 | 1.64 | 12, 1, 2, 5, 3, 6, 14, 8, 7, 15, 35, 43, 33, 19, 23, 25, 22, 28, 29, 36, 42, 41, 39, 38, 51 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Classroom practices | 13 | 0.52 | 12, 1, 2, 6, 14, 13, 8, 7, 9, 11, 31, 15, 43, 33, 37, 17, 10, 49, 21, 24, 28, 30, 29, 36, 18, 45, 40, 42, 41, 39, 46, 38, 51, 50 |
Tutorials | 10 | 0.4 | 6, 13, 9, 43, 37, 17, 49, 21, 28, 30, 36, 45, 40, 42, 41, 39, 38, 51 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Study of course materials and bibliography reading | 69 | 2.76 | 12, 2, 4, 3, 6, 44, 14, 13, 8, 7, 9, 11, 31, 16, 34, 43, 37, 20, 17, 49, 21, 28, 30, 29, 36, 18, 45, 40, 42, 41, 39, 46, 38, 51, 50 |
The teaching methodology will consist of the combination of lectures, presentation of reviews and papers, reading of specialized bibliography, classroom practices and resolution of exercises.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Continuous Assessment | 50% | 14 | 0.56 | 12, 1, 2, 5, 4, 3, 6, 44, 8, 13, 7, 9, 11, 31, 16, 15, 34, 32, 35, 43, 33, 37, 20, 19, 17, 10, 49, 23, 26, 25, 22, 21, 24, 27, 28, 30, 29, 36, 18, 45, 40, 42, 41, 46, 38, 51, 47, 50, 48 |
Exam | 50% | 3 | 0.12 | 12, 1, 4, 5, 2, 3, 6, 14, 8, 13, 7, 9, 11, 31, 15, 43, 33, 37, 20, 17, 49, 23, 25, 22, 21, 28, 30, 29, 42, 41, 39, 46, 38, 51 |
Assessment will be based on four components: two written exams, one coursework assignment, and class attendance. The final grade will result from the weighted sum of the following elements:
Evaluable Component 1: Midterm exam covering the Ancient Near East and Egypt – 25%
Evaluable Component 2: Final exam covering Greece and Rome – 25%
Evaluable Component 3: Coursework with critical use of artificial intelligence and focus on forgotten voices – 40%
Evaluable Component 4: Class attendance, verified through random checks – 10%
In order for an evaluable activity to be included in the final grade, the student must obtain a minimum score of 4 in both exams and the coursework.
To be eligible for reassessment, students must have completed the three main components: both exams and the coursework.
The teaching staff will announce the review procedure and schedule for each evaluable activity via Moodle or SIA at the time of submission or completion.
Irregularities in assessment: Any irregularity that may significantly alter the evaluation outcome will result in a score of 0 for the affected activity, regardless of any further disciplinary actions. In the case of multiple irregularities within the same course, the final grade will be 0.
Grade of “Not Assessable”: This grade will be assigned if the student has completed less than 30% of the evaluable activities.
Linguistic criteria: Spelling, lexical, and syntactic errors in written assignments will be penalized. Deductions may range from 0.1 to 0.2 points per error on the final grade. Repeated errors may lead to cumulative penalties.
Adaptations for online learning: If exams cannot be held in person, their weighting will remain the same, but the format will be adapted to the virtual tools available at UAB. Activities and class participation will be conducted through forums, wikis, debates, or platforms such as Moodle and Teams. Instructors will ensure accessibility or provide viable alternatives.
Single Assessment Option: This course offers the possibility of a single final assessment. In this case, the same three activities (exams and coursework) will be required, with the following weighting: 30% + 30% + 40%. The reassessment system, the “Not Assessable” criteria, and the grade review procedure will be the same as in continuous assessment.
Use of AI: The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted in this course as part of the coursework, provided that the final output reflects the student’s own significant contribution in terms of analysis and personal reflection. The student must: (i) indicate which parts were generated using AI; (ii) specify the tools employed; and (iii) include a critical reflection on how these tools influenced both the process and the final outcome. Lack of transparency in the use of AI in this assignment will be considered a violation of academic integrity and will result in a non-recoverable grade of 0, or more severe sanctions in serious cases.
Abrahami, Ph. / Battini, L. (eds.), 2008: Les armées du Proche-Orient ancien (IIIe-Ier mil. Av. J.C.). Oxford.
Arrayás, I., 2024: Estudios sobre la integración de los territorios anatólicos en el Imperio romano: violencia, diplomacia y control social en tiempos tardohelenísticos. Zaragoza.
Arrayás, I., 2022: Reflexiones sobre la reorganización romana de Oriente y de Occidente tras los conflictos mitridático y sertoriano. La acción pompeyana en Anatolia, Siria e Hispania. Madrid.
Beard, M., 2012: El triunfo romano. Madrid.
Cadiou, Fr., 2018: L'armée imaginaire. París.
De Souza, Ph. (ed.), 2009: La guerra en el mundo antiguo. Madrid.
Everson, T., 2004: Warfare in Ancient Greece. Trupp.
Fuller, J.F.C., 2012: Las batallas decisivas del mundo antiguo. Barcelona.
Goldsworthy, A., 2012: En el nombre de Roma. Madrid.
Goldsworthy, A., 2011: César. Madrid.
Goldsworthy, A., La caída de Cartago. Las guerras púnicas. Barcelona.
Hanson, V.D., 1989: The Western Way of War. Nueva York.
Hanson, V.D., 2004: Matanza y cultura. Batallas decisivas en el auge de la civilización occidental. México.
Hanson, V.D. (ed.), 2012: El Arte de la Guerra en el Mundo Antiguo. De las guerras persas a la caída de Roma. Barcelona.
Heckel, W., 2010: Las conquistas de Alejandro Magno. Barcelona.
Kagan, D. / Viggiano, G. (eds.), 2017: Hombres de Bronce. Hoplitas en la Antigua Grecia.
Le Bohec, Y., 1989: L'armée romaine sous le Haut-Empire. París.
Le Bohec, Y., 2001: César, chef de guerre: César stratège et tacticien. París.
Le Bohec, 2021: Histoire des guerres romaines: Milieu du VIIIe siècle av. J.-C - 410 ap J.-C. París.
Lendon, J.E., 2011: Soldados y fantasmas. Barcelona.
Nadali, D. / Vidal, J., 2014: The Other Face of the Battle. The impact of war on civilians in the Ancient Near East. Münster.
Parker, G. (ed.), 2010: Historia de la guerra. Madrid.
Quesada, F., 2014: Armas de Grecia y Roma. Madrid.
Sabin, P.A.G et alii (eds.), 2007. The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Warfare (2 vols.). Cambridge.
Van Wees, H., 2005: Greek Warfare: Myths and Realities. Londres.
Vidal, J. (ed.), 2010: Studies on War in the Ancient Near East. Münster.
Vidal, J. / Antela, B. (eds.), 2011: La guerra en la Antigüedad desde el presente. Zaragoza.
No specific software is required. Activities may be completed using common tools such as Microsoft Word. The use of artificial intelligence systems like ChatGPT, Copilot, or DeepSeek, whether in free or paid versions, is also permitted, provided it is done with critical awareness and the use of such tools is clearly indicated when relevant, as outlined in the assessment section.
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 1 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 1 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |