Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
Exercices and activities	30%	0	0	1, 3, 8, 7, 9, 10, 11
Reassessment	100%	2.5	0.1	1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 4, 9, 10
Test 1	35%	2.5	0.1	1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 7, 4, 9, 10, 11
Test 2	35%	2.5	0.1	1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 7, 4, 9, 10, 11

Continuous Assessment: There will be two exams (test 1 represent 35% and test 2 represent 35% of final mark). The rest (30%) can be one o more written works, essays and participation in the classroom.

These papers and comments will be reviews, summaries, and/or analytical commentaries on the proposed texts and other documents (tables, graphs, maps, images, etc.).

All course material will be assessed, including in-class explanations, required readings from the syllabus, and, where applicable, other required readings that may be assigned during the course.

At the time of completion/delivery of each assessment activity, the teacher will inform (Moodle, SIA) of the procedure and date of revision of the grades.

Reassessment: It consists in one exam about all the subject and its activities. The maximum mark is 5.

To participate in the recovery, students must have been previously assessed in a set of activities whose weight is equivalent to a minimum of 2/3 of the total grade (CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT) or submit all the scheduled tests (SINGLE ASSESSMENT).

To participate in the recovery process, you must have obtained a minimum grade of 3 on the subject average.

The student will be classified as non-evaluable when he has not delivered more than 30% of the evaluation activities.

Single Assessment: It consists in a test that will be carried out during the week determined by the faculty. The same assessment method as continuous assessment will be used.

If tests or exams cannot be taken onsite, they will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB’s virtual tools (original weighting will be maintained). Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or discussion on Teams, etc. Lecturers will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools,

or will offer them feasible alternatives.

Erasmus students who request to advance an exam must present to the professora written document from their home university justifying their request.

In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.

This subject allows the use of AI technologies exclusively for support tasks such as [***bibliographic or content-based searches, text correction or translations, where applicable]. In the case of subjects in a Modern Languages degree, use of translation must be specifically authorised by the teacher. Other specific situations may be contemplated, as deemed appropriate by the teacher. The student must clearly (i) identify which parts have been generated using AI technology; (ii) specify the tools used; and (iii) include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and final outcome of the activity. Lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in the assessed activity will be considered academic dishonesty; the corresponding grade may be lowered, or the work may even be awarded a zero. In cases of greater infringement, more serious action may be taken.