Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
Catalan Philology: Literary Studies and Linguistics | OT | 4 |
Spanish Language and Literature | OT | 3 |
Spanish Language and Literature | OT | 4 |
English Studies | OT | 3 |
English Studies | OT | 4 |
English and Catalan Studies | OT | 3 |
English and Catalan Studies | OT | 4 |
English and Spanish Studies | OT | 3 |
English and Spanish Studies | OT | 4 |
Catalan and Spanish Studies | OT | 3 |
Catalan and Spanish Studies | OT | 4 |
English and French Studies | OT | 0 |
English and French Studies | OT | 3 |
English and French Studies | OT | 4 |
English and Classics Studies | OT | 3 |
English and Classics Studies | OT | 4 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
A background in linguistics and knowledge of English to read the literature are necessary to follow the course.
The aim of this course is to introduce the student to an empirical field of linguistics: language acquisition.
We will consider language acquisition in both typical and pathological cases. By the end of the course, the student should be able to undertake original research in the field.
1. Introduction.
1.1 Language as a defining characteristic of the species. Plato's problem. An extreme case of poverty of stimulus: creoles.
2. The acquisition of morphosyntax in typically developing children
2.1. General features of language acquisition.
2.2.First syntactic productions.
2.3. Phenomena of apparent optionality: optional infinitives and optional production of third person clitics. A note on DLD.
2.4. The acquisition of syntax. Passives. Related structures.
3. The acquisition of the lexicon
3.1. Phonological bootstrapping
3.2. The acquisition of meaning: Nouns vs. Verbs
3.3. Biases in lexical learning.
4. The acquisition of logical words and pragmatics
4.1. Implicatures
4.2. Quantifiers
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Discussion of the literature | 45 | 1.8 | 7, 11, 8, 10, 6, 5, 9 |
Master lectures | 10 | 0.4 | 2, 20, 19, 4, 5, 9, 14, 13 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Problem resolution and preparation of written work | 43.5 | 1.74 | 1, 3, 4, 18, 15, 16, 17 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Reading | 30 | 1.2 | 2, 20, 19, 4, 5, 9, 14, 13 |
The methodology used will be based on problem resolution.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Oral test | 30% | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 3, 2, 20, 19, 11, 8, 7, 6, 10, 5, 4, 9, 12, 14, 13 |
Original analysis | 30% | 10 | 0.4 | 2, 20, 19, 5, 17, 18, 16, 15 |
Written test | 40% | 1.5 | 0.06 | 4, 5, 9, 18, 16, 15, 17 |
The evaluation will consist in three items: (i) an oral test, (ii) an original piece of research, and (iii) a written exam at the end of the course.
Item (iii) is a prerequisite to be reevaluated. Neither (i) nor (ii) will be subject to reevaluation. No use of AI is contemplated in the elaboration of the exercises.
Furthermore, and following the faculty's policy, to be reevaluated the final mark should be between 3.5 and 4.9, and the mark obtained after reevaluation cannot be higher than 5. The lecturer will inform the students of the terms and time of revision. Plagirism and copying in an exam will imply a zero of the item under evaluation; several irregularities of this kind will imply a zero for the whole course. Students will be 'No Avaluables' if they have not been evaluated for item (iii).
Non continous evaluation - Non-continuous evaluation will consist in the same three items of the continuous evaluation, only following a calendar that will be published in due time.
Aravind, A., De Villiers, J., de Villiers, P. A., Lonigan, C. J., Phillips, B. M., Clancy, J., ... & Valiente, C. (2017). Children’s quantification with every over time. Glossa, 10(X), 1.
Arosio, F., Pagliarini, E., Perugini, M., Barbieri, L., & Guasti, M. T. (2016). Morphosyntax and logical abilities in Italian poor readers: The problem of SLI under-identification. First Language, 36(3), 295-315.
Arosio, F., Foppolo, F., Pagliarini, E., Perugini, M., & Guasti, M. T. (2017). Semantic and pragmatic abilities can be spared in Italian children with SLI. Language Learning and Development, 13(4), 418-429.
Bergelson, E., & Swingley, D. (2012). At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9), 3253-3258.
Gavarró, Anna, Maya Leela, Luigi Rizzi & Julie Franck (2015). Knowledge of the OV parameter setting at 19months: Evidence from Hindi-Urdu. Lingua, 154: 27-34.
Gavarró, Anna, Vicenç Torrens & Ken Wexler (2010) Object clitic omission: two language types. Language Acquisition 17(4): 192-219.
Gervain, J., Nespor, M., Mazuka, R., Horie, R., & Mehler, J. (2008). Bootstrapping word order in prelexical infants : A Japanese – Italian cross-linguistic study. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 56–74.
Guasti, M. Teresa (2017). Language Acquisition. The Growth of Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. Second edition.
Halberda, J. (2003). The development of a word-learning strategy. Cognition, 87(1).
Katsos, N., Cummins, C., Ezeizabarrena, M. J., Gavarró, A., Kuvač Kraljević, J., Hrzica, G., ... & Noveck, I. (2016). Cross-linguistic patterns in the acquisition of quantifiers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(33), 9244-9249.
Levi,Yonata & Jeannette Schaeffer (eds.) (2002). Language Competence Across Populations. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Noveck, I. A. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition, 78(2), 165-188.
Pagliarini, E., Bill, C., Romoli, J., Tieu, L., & Crain, S. (2018). On children’s variable success with scalar inferences: Insights from disjunction in the scope of a universal quantifier. Cognition, 178, 178-192.
Skordos, D., Myers, A., & Barner, D. (2022).Quantifier spreading and the question under discussion. Cognition, 226, 105059.
Stiller, A. J., Goodman, N. D., & Frank, M. C. (2015). Ad-hoc implicature in preschool children. Language learning and development, 11(2), 176-190.
De Villiers, Jill, & Tom Roeper (eds.) (2011). Handbook of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition. Berlin: Springer.
Child Language Data Exchange System http://childes.psy.cmu.edu
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 1 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 1 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |