Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
Humanities | OB | 3 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
There is not
Presentation
This course is based on the conviction that cultural management is an ideal and privileged instrument for sociocultural transformation and cohesion in our society. Its contents revolve around this principle.
The sessions combine theoretical aspects with real-life experiences and projects, using applied approaches through Project-Based Learning. In this way, the learning processes are carried out in parallel and combine inductive and deductive processes. Throughout the sessions, cultural management professionals will be invited to delve deeper and expand the course content.
Syllabus
1. Contextualization of cultural management and the humanities in a context of complexity.
2. Scenarios of Cultural Management in Catalonia.
3. Planning as a key and transversal element of cultural management.
4. Variables for diagnosing organizations within the framework of cultural management.
5. The design and implementation of cultural management projects.
6. Evaluation and social return of cultural management projects.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Supervised | |||
Supervised activities (support teamwork, tutorials) | 50 | 2 | 4, 5, 7, 8, 2 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Autonomous activities (study, reading and pre-publication of work) | 30 | 1.2 | 4, 5, 8, 9 |
The methodology combines the following elements and spaces:
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
GROUP WORK (design and tutorials) | 40 % | 40 | 1.6 | 5, 8, 9 |
GROUP WORK (preparation and defense) | 20% | 10 | 0.4 | 6, 7, 8 |
INDIVIDUAL BRIEFCASE AND SELF-EVALUATION | 20% | 10 | 0.4 | 4, 3, 6, 7, 9, 2 |
INDIVIDUAL WORK | 20% | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 5, 6, 7, 9 |
Proposal
There will be four assessment items, of at least two different types, none of which will account for more than 50% of the final grade. Details will be published on the course's Moodle campus.
In justified cases, it is possible to design and defend the cultural management project individually. This must be communicated to the instructor by September 30, 2025.
To pass the course through continuous assessment, a minimum score of 5 points is required.
Students will receive a grade of "Not Assessable" provided they have submitted no more than 20% of the assessment activities.
Single assessment
You will be informed of the date of the theory test and the delivery of the activities in the Virtual Campus. You will have to hand in two activities and take a theory test:
-Theory test: 40%
-Design of a cultural management project proposal: 40%
-Individual work: 20%
Recovery: The same recovery system as for the continuous evaluation will be applied.
In the event that the student does not present/make the three pieces of evidence for the single evaluation, the subject will be left as "Not evaluable".
The revision of the final qualification follows the same procedure as for the continuous evaluation.
Plagiarism
If the student commits any irregularity that can cause a significant variation in the grading of an evaluation, this will be graded with 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that is initiated. If there are several irregularities in the evaluation records of the same subject, the final grade for that subject will be 0. Evaluation records with irregularities will not be recoverable.
Use of AI
In this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted as an integral part of the assignment, provided that the final result reflects a significant contribution from the student in personal analysis and reflection. Students must clearly identify which sections were generated with this technology, specify their undertakings, and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and final outcome of the assignment. Lack of transparency in the use of AI is considered academic dishonesty and may result in a penalty on the assignment grade, or greater penalties in serious cases.
ALBELDE, J; PARREÑO, J.M y MARRERO, coords. (2018). Humanidades ambientales. Madrid: Catarata
ALBERICH, T. (2012): Guía fácil de asociaciones. Manual de gestión parabla creación, desarrollo y dinamización de entidades sin ánimo de lucro. Madrid: Dykinson.
BARBAS, Á.; GOIG, R.M. y GIL, I. (2021). Animación e intervención sociocultural. Intervención educativa en contextos sociales. Madrid: UNED
BERTRAN, J.; NADAL, E. (2000). Manual de producció tècnica. Contribució a l'organització d'espectacles i festes populars. Barcelona: Departament de Cultura de la Generalitat de Catalunya.
BONET, L. [ed.] (2010) L’avaluació externa de projectes culturals. Barcelona: Gescènic. Quaderns de cultura, n. 3.
BOIX, T. (1990). Animación y gestión cultural. València: Grup dissabte.
CARNACEA, A.;LOZANO,A. (2011). Arte, intervención y acción social.La creatividad transformadora. Madrid: Ed. Grupo 5.
CARREÑO, T.; VILLARROYA, A. (2020) L’ocupació cultural a l’àmbit públic. Perfil i condicions laborals dels professionals de la cultura als ajuntaments. Barcelona: Diputació de Barcelona.
COLOMBO, A.; ROSELLÓ, D. (2008). Gestión cultural. Estudio de caso. Barcelona: Ariel.
CONNORS, T.D. (Ed.) (1998). Manual de les organitzacions no lucratives (Volum I). Barcelona: Edicions Pleniluni
CONSELL NACIONAL DE LA CULTURA I DE LES ARTS DE LA GENERALITAT. (2010). Codi de bones pràctiques en l'àmbit de la creació i de la interpretació musicals.
CUBELES, X.; MASCARELL, M. (2019) Els impactes de la cultura. Metodologia per a l’estudi dels impactes d’esdeveniments culturals. Barcelona: Diputació de Barcelona. Col·lecció Eines. Sèrie Cultura.
DiMAGGIO, P. (1987). Managers of the Arts: Careers and Opinions of Senior Administrators of U.S. Art Museums, Symphony Orchestras. Redident Theatres, and Local Arts Agencies. Washington: Seven Locks Press.
DRUCKER, P. (2000). Organitzacions sense ànim de lucre. Gestió: teoria i pràctica. Barcelona: Edicions UOC-ECSA.
FANTOVA, F. (2012). La gestión de organizaciones no lucrativas. Madrid: Editorial CCS.
GAIRÍN, Joaquín (1994). Dinámica organizativa. En GAIRÍN, Joaquín; DARDER, Pere. (coord.): Organización y gestión de centros educativos. Barcelona: Praxis.
GARCIA, J. (2025). De bolo. Manual de música en directo. Madrid: Sílex Ediciones
IBAR, M. (1992). Cómo organizar y gestionar una entidad de animación sociocultural. Madrid: Narcea.
MANITO, F. (coord.). Planificación estratégica de la culturaen España. Madrid: Fundación Autor, 2008.
LÓPEZ, T i MARTINELL, A. (1999). Políticas culturales y gestión cultural: Organum sobre los conceptos clave de la práctica profesional. Girona: Documenta - Universitat de Girona.
MUNILLA, G. (Coord) (2008). Introducció a la gestió d’organitzacions culturals. Barcelona: UOC.
POSE PORTO, H. (2007). La cultura en las ciudades. Barcelona: Graó.
RODRÍGUEZ, M.G. (2008). La gestión artístico-musical y la mujer en España. Málaga: Universidad de Málaga.
ROSELLÓ, D. (2017). Diseño y evaluación de proyectos culturales. Barcelona: Ariel.
ÚCAR,X. (1992). El teatro en la animación sociocultural. Madrid: Diagrama.
ÚCAR, X.; LLENA, A. Coords.(2006). Miradas y diálogos en torno a la acción comunitaria. Barcelona: Graó.
VERNIS, A. et al. (1997). La gestió de les organitzacions no lucratives. Treballant per las millora de les associacions. Barcelona: Proa-Columna.
Microsoft Office; Canva and Genially.
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 1 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 1 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |