Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
4310486 Teaching in Secondary Schools, Vocational Training and Language Centres | OT | 0 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
There are not prerequisites
The educational guidance is a pedagogical practice at the service of the social, personal, academic and professional development of each one of the youngsters in their process of continuum formative in secondary education.
The educational guidance professional, at the center and with the educational community, needs to have global and specific competences that make possible, at the same time, teamwork in the institution and direct attention to the students in order to ensure its projection and educational success.
For this reason, the objectives carried out through this subject that the teaching team presents to their students are:
1. Know the main models of orientative action in the secondary school and its possibilities and limitations, as well as the different agents that take part in the guidance process, in the center and from a network perspective.
2. Develop the detection capacity of services and resources to respond to the needs of guidance in the framework of the educational project of the center and in the educational environment
MODULE 1: Psycho-pedagogical evaluation
Individual and group evaluation.
Role of the psychoeducational evaluation: Prevention / Support / Rehabilitation
Observation / Interviews / Reports / Evaluation records
Assessment and resources for intervention in the classroom and in schools
MODULE 2:Vocational guidance through tutorial action
Aim, objectives and contents of vocational guidance in the 21st century in educational centres.
Methodological criteria and resources for the development of the students' professional project.
Strategies for the integration of career guidance into tutorial action and the curriculum
The new VET law: implications for career guidance
Examples of good practice in career guidance
MODULE 3: Communication and coexistence in the educational centre.
Communication and participation as a school culture.
Preventive culture and school climate.
Strategies and resources for school mediation
Coexistence project
Protocols for the improvement of coexistence
MODULE 4: Environment and networking
Models of guidance and counselling in networks: functions of the centre and area counsellor.
Planning and management of psychopedagogical services and resources
Teamwork: The teaching teams - the tutors - the educational advisor - the EAPs
The role of the counselor with families
Resources and external psycho-pedagogical teams: collaboration
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lecture. Practice. Illustrations and case study | 97.5 | 3.9 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 24, 25, 26 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Face to face tutoring: individual or group | 75 | 3 | 2, 4, 5, 17, 21, 22, 24, 25, 27 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Personal Study. References and text analysis. Practice activities and didactic proposal in group | 202.5 | 8.1 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 27 |
The methodology is student-centered in order to have a meaningful, functional and contextualized learning process. To do so, different methodological strategies are used, such as classroom practices, case studies, role-plays or debates among others. These strategies combine the theoretical foundation together with its practical implementation, and they are carried out by experts that combine their lecturing role at the university with career guidance practice in educational centers.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Group and/or individual practice into the classroom | 50% | 0 | 0 | 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 23, 24, 27 |
Module work | 50% | 0 | 0 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26 |
Assessment is both formative and summative. Formative assessment makes it possible to monitor the evolution of the teaching-learning process and summative assessment makes it possible to verify what has been learnt and the skills developed through theoretical and practical assessment activities with a cross-cutting approach.
Given that the vehicular language of the Master's degree and of secondary education is Catalan, the oral and written tasks related to this module must be presented in this language. In written activities (individual or group), linguistic correctness, writing and formal aspects of presentation will be taken into account. In addition, oral expression must be fluent and correct, and a high level of comprehension of academic texts must be shown. An activity may be non-assessed, returned or failed if the teacher considers that it does not meet the above-mentioned requirements.
Each module will have two evaluation evidences:
- Classroom practicals, with a value of 50% in the weight of the final grade of the module. Classroom practicals may be individual or group.
- Module work, worth 50% of the weight of the final module mark. The module work will consist of a case analysis with a theoretical reflection/contribution related to the case. It will be individual and will have a maximum of 10 pages, including bibliography.
In order to pass the module, the student must obtain a mark equal to or higher than 5 in each evaluation evidence. In order to pass the subject, the student must obtain a mark equal to or higher than 5 in each module.
The final mark for the module will consist of the sum of the classroom practicals and the module work. The final mark for the course corresponds to 21% of the mark for module 1, 29% of the mark for module 2, 26% of the mark for module 3 and 24% of the mark for module 4.
The due dates are: 14 February (module 1), 7 March (module 2), 7 February (module 3) and 28 February (module 4).
The results of the assessment will be announced within one month of submission.
Students who do not pass the course may sit the make-up exam. In order to take part in the retake, the student must have been previously assessed in a set of activities whose weight is equivalent to at least two thirds of the total grade for the subject. In order to participate in the recovery process it is necessary that the student obtains a minimum grade of 3.5 in the average of the subject. The recovery date will be May 16th and will consist of the resolution of a practical case study related to all the topics covered in the course (50%) and a written test (50%). In this case, the maximum mark that can be obtained will be a 5.
Individual situations that do not fit in with the approach described above must be communicated in writing to the lecturers involved, who will assess whether it is possible to make any adaptation, without losing sight of the assessment philosophy of the subject.
The delivery of assignments will be carried out primarily via the virtual campus. Other methods of submission may be used, subject to prior agreement with the teaching staff, informed in class and/or via the virtual campus. Papers will not be accepted if they are handed in by any means not agreed with the lecturer, nor will papers handed in with incorrect formats, without the authors' names or handed in after the deadline. Students are responsible for ensuring that the format of the files is compatible with the delivery to the Moodle classroom. Failure to submit the evaluation evidence within the deadline set in the course guide is considered Non-assessable
According to UAB regulations, plagiarism or copying of any work will be penalised with a 0 as a mark for this work, losing the possibility of recovering it, whether it is an individual or group work (in this case, all members of the group will have a 0). If during individual work in class, the teacher considers that a student is trying to copy or is found tobe using any type of document or device not authorised by the teacher, the student will be graded with a 0, without the option to make it up.
If a student does not attend a minimum of 80% of the sessions (applicable to each module), he/she will fail the module and will have to take the retake exam.
This subject should include the gender and inclusion perspective through (self-)critical reflection on one's own subjectivity and how it affects teaching. Ethical commitment to the deontological principles of the profession will also be taken into account. It will be necessary to show an attitude compatible with the teaching profession, such as: commitment and responsibility with the work, respect, participation, active listening, cooperation, empathy, kindness, punctuality, non-judgment, argument, etc. It is also essential to make proper use of electronic devices (mobile, computer, touch tablet, etc.) in the classroom. These devices can only be used to carry out activities related to the subject.
Single assessment
Students who, at the beginning of the academic year, choose to take the single assessment through the procedures provided by the faculty and inform the teaching staff, will be assessed on 7th March. The single assessment will consist of a written test (50%) and an interview related to the contents of the whole course (50%). In order to pass the course, both tests must be passed with a minimum of 5 in order to obtain the average mark.
The recovery process follows the same procedure as for the continuous assessment. The recovery date will be the 16th May.
Berrio G, N., Redondo C. y Mejía Toro, W. (2019). Evaluación psicopedagógica: Revisión sistemática. Pensando Psicología, 15 (26), 1-27.
Bonals, J. y Sánchez-Cano, M. (Coords.) (2007). La evaluación psicopedagógica. Barcelona: Graó.
Boqué, M.C. (2018). La mediación va a la escuela. Hacia un buen plan de convivencia en el centro. Ed. Narcea
Castiñeira, A.; Lozano, JM. (2014) El poliedro del liderazgo. Barcelona. Libros de cabecera.
Departament d’Educació (2019). Protocol de prevenció, detecció i intervenció davant conductes d’odi i discriminació.
Departament d’Ensenyament (2018). Competències bàsiques de l’àmbit personal i social. Direcció General d’Educació Secundària Obligatòria i Batxillerat.
Echeita, G. y Calderón, I, (2014). Obstáculos a la inclusión: cuestionando concepciones y prácticas sobre la evaluación psicopedagógica. Àmbits de Psicopedagogia i Orientació, 41, 67-98.
Grup de Recerca de superdotació i altes capacitats del COPC i; Grup de Recerca de superdotació i altes capacitats del COPEC. (2018). Guia per a la detecció i intervención educativa en els alumnes amb altes capacitats intel·lectuals. Guia actualitzada. Accessible a: https://www.pedagogs.cat/doc/guia_superdotacio.pdf
Institut Infància i Adolescència de Barcelona (2019). Informe de Dades clau de la infància i l’adolescència a Barcelona 2019. IIAB-IERMB i Ajuntament de Barcelona.
Institut per a la Convivència i l’Èxit Escolar. Govern Illes Balear. (s.d.). Millorem la convivència amb les pràctiques restauratives. https://www.caib.es/sites/convivexit/f/228561
Meirieu, Philippe; (2007). Frankenstein Educador.Barcelona. Laertes.
OECD (2018). Manual per a entorns d'aprenentatge innovadors. Barcelona: Editorial UOC
Ritacco, J. y Amores, F.J. (2011). Buenas prácticas educativas ante el fracaso escolar en programas de apoyo y refuerzo en contextos de exclusión social. Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, Vol 15, n 3, pp 117-137.
Van Manen, Max.(1998). El tacto en la enseñanza. Barcelona. Paidós.
Fonts documentals:
L’orientació educativa i l’acció tutorial al llarg i en cada una de les etapes educatives i ensenyaments. Aprenentatge i formació continuats. Departament d’Enseyament, web xtec, secció orientació educativa.
De l’escola inclusiva al sistema inclusiu, Materials per a l’atenció a la diversitat. Departament d’Ensenyament, web xtec.
Ara és demà, Debat sobre el futur de l’Educació a Catalunya (2017), Document 1/2017 Consell Escolar de Catalunya
Reptes de l’Educació a Catalunya.Anuari 2018, Director Jordi Riera, n.86, Fundació Jaume Bofill.
Habilidades y competencias del siglo XXI para los aprendices del nuevo milenio en los paises de la OCDE (2010), OCDE y Instituto de Tecnologías Educativas
Do not use
Information on the teaching languages can be checked on the CONTENTS section of the guide.