Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
4314949 General Health Psychology | OB | 1 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
There are no prerequisits
The general objective of this module is for the student to build a comprehensive health concept, in accordance with WHO guidelines. That is, knowing how psychological, biological, educational and social factors help people and communities improve its well-being, increasing its knowledge and changing attitudes.
Specific objectives are: First, helping the student to think about health concept, acquiring knowledge from different perspectives (biopsychosocial one, gender and intercultural one, and family developmental one). Secondly, become familiar with scope of action of the healthcare general psychologist, knowing regulations, quality work standards, the foundations of bioethics applied to healthcare psychology, referral criteria, and how to start entrepreneurship activities as a healthcare general psychologist. Likewise, the module will promote the development of competences in research, and selection and critical reading of relevant information for professional field.
1.- Conceptual foundations of healthcare psychology.
a.- Health from the bio-psycho-social perspective.
b.- Health from the intersectional gender perspective.
c.- Health from the family developmental perspective.
2.- Professional foundations of healthcare psychology.
a.- Professional profile of the healthcare general psychologist. Framework.
b.- Scope of action of healthcare psychology. Healthcare system.
c.- Professional ethics in Psychology. Confidentiality and data protection.
3.- Organizational foundations of healthcare psychology.
a.- Legal regulations in healthcare psychology.
b.- Management and organization of healthcare system.
4.- Methodological basis in healthcare psychology.
a.- Methodological skills for a critical reading of scientific publications.
b.- Research in healthcare psychology: Efficacy, effectivness and efficiency of interventions.
c.- Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Conferences and classroom activities | 40 | 1.6 | |
Type: Supervised | |||
Individual and group tutorials | 3 | 0.12 | |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Course work | 25 | 1 | |
Exercises | 20 | 0.8 | |
Study and reading | 60 | 2.4 |
Different activities and methodologies will be used. There will be readings on the general frameworks: scientific, methodological, professional and organizational. On the other hand, classroom and autonomous work activities will be done: critical reading and discussion of texts, workshops, debates, bibliographic searches, work presentation and discussion.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ev1. Course work | 45% | 0 | 0 | 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16 |
Ev2. Written synthesy test | 25% | 2 | 0.08 | 6, 7, 9, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18 |
Ev3. Virtual test | 30% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 14, 17 |
Final grade will be the result of:
Ev 1. Course work. Weight: 45%. Group work requiring information collection and critical analysis, centered on a specific topic of healthcare psychology. Mandatory. Virtual. 12th week.
Ev2. Synthesy test. Weight: 25%. Written exercise. Practical case resolution based on topic 3. In-person evidence. 11th week.
Ev3. Virtual mandatory test. Weight: 30%. Content: Bias risk assessment, documental search, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. 15th week.
PASS: Final grade equal to or higher than 5. There are no procedures to improve grade.
NOT ASSESSED: Students who have done evidences with a weight of less than 40% of the total will be "Not assessed."
RESIT: Students who have not reached a final grade of 5 or more, and have completed evidences with a weight of at least 2/3 of the total. The resit will consist on complementary activities or a synthesy test, according to coordinator teacher criteria. Maximum grade that can be obtained is 5.
Faculty of Psychology assessment guidelines (2020-21) will be applied: https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/calendaris-1345721956986.html
UNIQUE ASSESSMENT
Conditions for students who have indicated to Gestió Acadèmica that they are enrolled in the single assessment:
• The assessment week will be held on January 15, 2024.
• It will consist of three tests; a) reflection and/or analysis test referring to the Conceptual Foundations of Health Psychology b) analysis test referring to the Professional Foundations of Health Psychology c) practical test on the methodological foundations of health psychology
• The weight of each test will be the same as that set by the continuous assessment.
• The estimated duration of the single assessment is 3.30 hours.
APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271-285.
Braveman, P. (2014). What is health equity: And How does a life-course approach take us further toward it? Maternal and Child Health Journal, 18, 366-372. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1226-9
Higgins, J. P. T., Green, S., & Cochrane Collaboration. (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester, England; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., … Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339(jul21 1), b2700–b2700. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2700
Miqueo, C. et al. (eds.) (2001) Perspectivas de género en salud. Madrid: Minerva Edicione
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med, 6(7), e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Myrick, A. C., Green, E. J., i Crenshaw, D. (2014). The influence of divergent parental attachment styles on adolescent maturation: Implications for family counseling practitioners. The Family Journal, 22(1), 35-42. doi: 10.1177/1066480713491217
OMS (2014). Organització Mundial de la Salut (World Health Organisation, WHO). Consultada l’abril de 2014 en http://www.who.int/en/
Padyab, M., Malmberg, G., Norberg, M, i Blomstedt, Y. (2013). Life course socieconomic position and mortality: A population register-based study form Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 41(8), Dec 2013, 785-791. Ddoi: 10.1177/1403494813493366
Portell, M. i Vives, J. (2014). Introducció als dissenys experimentals, quasiexperimentals i ex post facto. Barcelona: Servei de publicacions de la UAB.
Remschmidt, H., Belfer, M., Goodyer, I. (2004). Facilitating Pathways: care, treatment and prevention in child and adolescent mental health. Berlin: Springer.
Remschmidt, H., van Engeland, H. (1999). Child and adolescent psychiatry in Europe. Historical development, current situation, future perspectives. New YorK: Springer.
Reverte Cejudo, D. y Sánchez Bayle, M. (2009) Globalización y salud. Madrid: Ediciones GPS http://www.fadsp.org/pdf/globalizacion%20y%20salud%20(1).pdf.
Sánchez Bayle, M. (coord.) (2010). La situación de la salud y el sistema sanitario en España. Madrid: Fundación Primero de Mayo. http://www.fadsp.org/html/situacion%20salud.htm
Sánchez-Meca, J., & Botella, J. (2010). Revisiones sistemáticas y meta-análisis: herramientas para la práctica profesional. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 7–17.
Varios autores (2002). Salud y Equidad. Documentación Social: Revista de Estudios Sociales y de Sociología Aplicada, 127.
Velasco, A. (2009) Sexos, género y salud. Madrid: Minerva Ediciones.
No specific software is required in this course
Information on the teaching languages can be checked on the CONTENTS section of the guide.