Logo UAB

Sustainable Mobility and Ecocities

Code: 43064 ECTS Credits: 9
2024/2025
Degree Type Year
4313784 Interdisciplinary Studies in Environmental, Economic and Social Sustainability OT 0

Contact

Name:
Oriol Marquet Sardà
Email:
oriol.marquet@uab.cat

Teachers

Oriol Marquet Sardà
Sara Maestre Andres
Johannes Langemeyer
Carles Gasol Martinez

Teaching groups languages

You can view this information at the end of this document.


Prerequisites

There are no specific recommendations


Objectives and Contextualisation

The cities on the planet, although they only occupy less than 3% of the total surface area, concentrate more than 50% of the population and have 80% of the greenhouse gas emissions associated. Construction and mobility represent more than 75% consumption of energy resources. In this module, the student is approached to new scenarios for the future of eco-cities through tools and methods for the environmental improvement of cities as well as the management of mobility and transport in an urban environment.

1. Form theoretical concepts about sustainable mobility and eco-cities.

2. Approach students to the new scenarios of the future of the urban world from the new paradigms of sustainability.

3. Facilitate the integration of environmental, social and economic aspects in the analysis of cities.

4. Present tools and methodologies for the environmental improvement of cities at different scales: buildings, neighbourhoods and urban environments.

5. To train students in the urban metabolism and in the social, environmental and economic costs that daily mobility implies.

6. Introduce the student methods, tools and actions prevention of environmental impacts of cities and their transport models against hegemonic public policies.

7. Present instruments for management, cross-cutting strategies and citizen participation in sustainable mobility and eco-cities through case studies.

8. Work in an international and multidisciplinary context.


Competences

  • Analyse, summarise, organise and plan projects related to the environmental improvement of product, processes and services.
  • Communicate and justify conclusions clearly and unambiguously to both specialised and non-specialised audiences.
  • Use acquired knowledge as a basis for originality in the application of ideas, often in a research context.
  • Work in an international, multidisciplinary context.

Learning Outcomes

  1. Design research projects that contain proposals and contributions to knowledge of sustainable mobility.
  2. Formulate action plans and environmental improvement plans.
  3. Know the Agenda 21 tools for sustainable urban development.
  4. Know the tools of eco-innovation that are applicable to urban environments.
  5. Propose and assess self-sufficiency strategies in cities.
  6. Support the strengthening of the social capacity of public and private bodies, at different levels, by providing knowledge towards the task of seeking out solutions to a wide variety of situations within the urban space, from an environmental perspective.
  7. Use acquired knowledge as a basis for originality in the application of ideas, often in a research context.
  8. Work in an international, multidisciplinary context.

Content

There are two parts: PART 1 SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY & PART 2 ECO-CITIES

 

 PART 1 (4.5 ECTS)SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY (Prof. Dr. Oriol Marquet)

In recent years, mobility and transport, both in academia and in public policies, have been the object of an enormous analytical and applied transformation. The subject under study has shifted from transport to everyday mobility, which implies changing the analytical focus from the supply side to the demand perspective. At the same time, a dialectical or congruent methodological approach has been incorporated, replacing the more traditional causal approach, all framed within the innovation that has meant moving on from the paradigm of modernity to that of sustainability. These changes began in the 80s of the 20th century, after the great economic crisis of the 70s, when oil began to show signs of being a finite energy source and public transport policies had to be rethought, especially in cities and metropolitan areas. In recent years, we have witnessed a transformation process that has implied the abandonment of the modernity paradigm, which largely shaped the twentieth century, and the adoption of that of sustainability, which is regarded as the guiding principle of the 21st century.

Sustainable mobility is expressed through daily trips that pollute less and that use less energy, that is, the non-motorized transport modes (walking and cycling). However, these transport modes require urban characteristics that allow their use: adequate public spaces and destinations close enough for you to get on a bike or walk, within a reasonable time and with an adequate effort. The urban variables that allow this type of mobilitycome together under the concept of compactness, a dense urban space, where density and mixture of urban functions is the most appropriate.

  1.  The analysis of urban mobility under the new paradigms of the 21st century.
  • From modernity to sustainability.
  • From transport to mobility.
  • The dialectic between mobility and the city
  1. Urban planning and daily mobility.
  • The genesis of modern everyday mobility.
  • Modern urbanism and mobility.
  • Sustainable cities, less polluting transport.
  1. Sustainable mobility. New scientific framework and new political challenge.
  • Energy consumption of transport modes.
  • Characterization of transport emissions.
  • The modal split and the costs of mobility.
  • European policy and sustainable mobility.
  1. The impacts of mobility
  • The environmental impacts.
  • Social impacts.
  • Health impacts
  • The economic costs
  1. The challenges of mobility
  • Towards a sustainable mobility.
  • Accessibility.
  • Future of mobility

PART 2 ECO-CITIES (prof.  Dr. Carles Martínez Gasol, Sara Maestre , Dr. Johannes Langemeyer)

The cities on the planet, although they only occupy less than 3% of the total surface, concentrate more than 50% of thepopulation and have 80% of the greenhouse gas emissions associated. In some Europeancountries the cycle of construction and mobility represent more than 75% consumption of energy resources. In this context, urban ecology is key to improving future regional development and urban systems. The objectives of this module are the application of tools to facilitate urban sustainable development. Classes will be articulated in the following sub-blocks:

 

  1. ECO-CITIES. (Professor: Dr. Carles Martínez)
  • Urban answers to complex situations. The urban ecosystem. Ecosystem analysis. Data, tools, and preliminary concepts. Tools for urban sustainable development: urban metabolism.
  1. THE FERTILE CITY. (Professor: Dr. Carles Martínez, Sara Maestre  and Dr. Johannes Langemeyer)
  • Urban agriculture is the backbone of the cities of the future. Tools: LCA and carbon footprint applied to quantify the impact of food production in cities.
  1. ECOINNOVATION PUBLIC SPACE. (Professor: Carles Martínez)
  • Application of eco-design tools and Life Cycle Assessment in the improvement of urban elements. Energy characterization of urban spaces: SIG + ACV.
  • Ecosystem services (Professor: Dr. Francesc Baró and Dr. Johannes Langemeyer)
  • Concepts, methodologies and instruments for research and applied use.
  1. BUILDING. ECOINNOVATION IN BUILDINGS. (Professor: Dr. Carles Martínez)
  • Energy renovation. Energy efficiency. Water saving and rainwater management, waste management and biodiversity. Eco-innovation in sustainable construction. Use of materials with low energy content. Self-sufficient buildings.

 


Activities and Methodology

Title Hours ECTS Learning Outcomes
Type: Directed      
Lessons 49 1.96
Type: Supervised      
Final work 60 2.4
Type: Autonomous      
Complementary activities 20 0.8
Reading of papers 45 1.8
Reading of teaching material 18 0.72
Readings related to the subject 28 1.12

 

Master classes and problem solving and case studies.
Learning based on real cases.
Presentation and oral presentation of research works developed.
Participation in complementary activities.

Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.


Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title Weighting Hours ECTS Learning Outcomes
Assistance and active participation in class 15% 0 0 3, 4, 6, 7, 8
Course work 30% 0 0 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Defense of course work 10% 5 0.2 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Exam 35%+10% 0 0 2, 4, 5, 7

 

Evaluation of the first part (Sustainable Mobility)

  • Class attendance, active participation (30%);
  • Exam (70%)

Evaluation of the second PART (Ecocities)

• Delivery of papers (comment of papers) (60%)

• Oral defense of the same (20%)

• Written test (20%)

 

Each part contributes 50% to the final module mark. 

This module does not offer Single Assessment, as agreed with the coordination of the degree and with the Dean's Office of the Faculty of Sciences.

 


Bibliography

Bloque 1

Apparicio, P., Gelb, J., Jarry, V., & Mann, É. L. (2021). Cycling in one of the most polluted cities in the world : Exposure to noise and air pollution and potential adverse health impacts in Delhi. International Journal of Health Geographics, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-021-00272-2

Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005

Banister, D. (2011). The trilogy of distance, speed and time. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 950–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.12.004

Brand, C., Anable, J., & Morton, C. (2019). Lifestyle, efficiency and limits: modelling transport energy and emissions using a socio-technical approach. Energy Efficiency, 12(1), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9678-9

Brand, C., Anable, J., Ketsopoulou, I., & Watson, J. (2020). Road to zero or road to nowhere? Disrupting transport and energy in a zero carbon world. Energy Policy, 139(February), 111334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111334

Choi, K., Park, H. J., & Dewald, J. (2021). The impact of mixes of transportation options on residential property values: Synergistic effects of walkability. Cities, 111(January), 103080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103080
Ivanova, D., & Wood, R. (2020). The unequal distribution of household carbon footprints in Europe and its link to sustainability. Global Sustainability, 3. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.12

De Witte, A., Hollevoet, J., Dobruszkes, F., Hubert, M., & Macharis, C. (2013). Linking modal choice to motility: A comprehensive review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 49, 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.009

Ellegård, K., & Vilhelmson, B. (2004). Home as a Pocket of Local Order: Everyday Activities and The Friction of Distance. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 86(4), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00168.x

Glazener, A., Sanchez, K., Ramani, T., Zietsman, J., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Mindell, J. S., Fox, M., & Khreis, H. (2021). Fourteen pathways between urban transportation and health: A conceptual model and literature review. Journal of Transport and Health, 21(June 2020), 101070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101070

Harrison, R. M., Allan, J., Carruthers, D., Heal, M. R., Lewis, A. C., Marner, B., Murrells, T., & Williams, A. (2021). Non-exhaust vehicle emissions of particulate matter and VOC from road traffic : A review. Atmospheric Environment, 262(July), 118592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118592

Haugen, K., Holm, E., Strömgren, M., Vilhelmson, B., & Westin, K. (2012). Proximity, accessibility and choice: A matter of taste or condition? Papers in Regional Science, 91(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00374.x

Hosford, K., Firth, C., Brauer, M., & Winters, M. (2021). The effects of road pricing on transportation and health equity: a scoping review. Transport Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1898488

Jabareen, Y. (2006). Sustainable Urban Forms: TheirTypologies, Models, and Concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X05285119

James, P., Weissman, J., Wolf, J., Mumford, K., Contant, C. K., Hwang, W., Taylor, L., & Glanz, K. (2016). Comparing GPS, Log, Survey, and Accelerometry to Measure Physical Activity. American Journal of Health Behavior, 40(1), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.40.1.14

Lamb, W. F., Mattioli, G., Levi, S., Timmons Roberts, J., Capstick, S., Creutzig, F., Minx, J. C., Müller-Hansen, F., Culhane, T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability, 3, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13

Lamb, W. F., Res, E., Lamb, W. F., Wiedmann, T., Pongratz, J., Andrew, R., Crippa, M., Olivier, J. G. J., Wiedenhofer, D., Mattioli, G., Khourdajie, A. Al, House, J., Pachauri, S., Figueroa, M., Saheb, Y., Slade, R., & Hubacek, K. (2021). A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018. Environmental Research, 16, 073005

Loo, B., & Chow, S. (2006). Sustainable Urban Transportation: Concepts, Policies, and Methodologies. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 132(2), 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2006)132:2(76)

Marquet, O. (2020). Spatial distribution of ride-hailing trip demand and its association with walkability and neighborhood characteristics. Cities, 106(August), 102926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102926

Marquet, O., & Miralles-Guasch, C. (2014). Walking short distances. The socioeconomic drivers for the use of proximity in everyday mobility in Barcelona. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 70, 210–222. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.10.007

Marquet, O., & Miralles-Guasch, C. (2015). The Walkable city and the importance of the proximity environments for Barcelona’s everyday mobility. Cities, 42, 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.10.012

Marquet, O., & Miralles-Guasch, C. (2016). City of Motorcycles. On how objective and subjective factors are behind the rise of two-wheeled mobility in Barcelona. Transport Policy, 52, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.07.002

Marquet, O., & Miralles-Guasch, C. (2017). Efectos de la crisis economica en la movilidad cotidiana en la Region metropolitana de Barcelona. Boletín de La Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, 75, 9–28. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21138/bage.2490

Marquet, O., Floyd, M. F., James, P., Glanz, K., Jennings, V., Jankowska, M. M., Kerr, J., & Hipp, J. A. (2020). Associations between worksite walkability, greenness, and physical activity around work. Environment and Behavior, 52(2), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518797165

Marquet, O., Hirsch, J. A., Kerr, J., Jankowska, M. M., Mitchell, J., Hart, J. E., Laden, F., Hipp, J. A., & James, P. (2022). GPS-based activity space exposure to greenness and walkability is associated with increased accelerometer-based physical activity. Environment International, 165(May), 107317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107317

Marquet, O., Ríos Bedoya, V., & Miralles-Guasch, C. (2017). Local accessibility inequalities and willingness to walk in Latin American cities. Findings from Medellín, Colombia. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(3), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2016.1230804

Marquet, O., Anguelovski, I., Nello-Deakin, S., & Honey-Rosés, J. (2024). Decoding the 15-Minute City Debate: Conspiracies, Backlash, and Dissent in Planning for Proximity. Journal of the American Planning Association, 92(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2024.2346596
 
Marquet, O., Fernández-Núñez, M.-B., & Maciejewska, M. (2024). The political price of superblocks. Electoral outcomes of sustainable transport interventions in Barcelona. Environment International, 108789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108789

Mattioli, G. (2014). Where Sustainable Transport and Social Exclusion Meet: Households Without Cars and Car Dependence in Great Britain. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 16(3), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2013.858592

Næss, P., & Cao, X. J. (2017). Which D ’ s are the important ones ? The effects of built environment characteristics on driving distance in Oslo and Stavanger. The Journal of Transport and Land Use, 945–964.

Shen, L., & Stopher, P. R. (2014). Review of GPS Travel Survey and GPS Data-Processing Methods. Transport Reviews, 34(3), 316–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2014.903530

Steg, L. (2005). Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2–3), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.07.001

Stopher, P. R., & Greaves, S. P. (2007). Household travel surveys: Where are we going? Transportation Research Part A, 41(5), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.09.005

Bloque 2

  • Adriaanse, A., Bringezu, S., Hammond, A., Moriguchi, Y., Rodenburg, E., Rogich, D., Schürz, H. (1997) “Resource Flows: The material Basis of Industrial Economies”, World Resource Institute, Washington USA, Wuppertal Institute, Wuppertal Germany, Netherlands Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment, The Hague Netherlands, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan. ISBN 1-56973-209-4.
  • Ayres, R. U. and Ayres, L. W. (2002) “Industrial Ecology. Towards Closing the Materials Cycle”, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton MA, USA.
  • Eurostat. 2001. Economy-wide material flow accounts and derived indicators: A methodological guide. Luxembourg: Eurostat, European Commission, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/environmental_accounts/publications/economy_wide_material_flow_accounts
  • Ceron-Palma I, Sanyé-Mengual E, Oliver-Solà J, Montero JI, Rieradevall J. (2012) Towards a green sustainable strategy for social neighbourhoods in Latin America: Case from social housing in Merida, Yucatan, Mexico. In press, Habitat International.
  • Joan-Manuel F. Mendoza, Jordi Oliver-Solà, Xavier Gabarrell, Alejandro Josa, Joan Rieradevall (2012) Life cycle assessment of granite application in sidewalks. Int J Life Cycle Assess (2012) 17:580-592
  • Joan-Manuel F. Mendoza, Jordi Oliver-Solà, Xavier Gabarrell, Joan Rieradevall, Alejandro Josa (2012). Planning strategies for promoting environmentally suitable pedestrian pavements in cities. Transportation. Research Part D 17 (2012) 442-450
  • Ceron-Palma I, Oliver-Solà J, Sanyé-Mengual E, Montero JI, Rieradevall J (2012) Barriers and opportunities regarding the implementation of Rooftop Greenhouses (RTEG) in Mediterranean cities of Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, in press (DOI:10.1080/10630732.20).
  • Sanyé-Mengual E, Cerón-Palma I, Oliver-Solà J, Montero JI, Rieradevall J (2012) Environmental analysis of the logistics of agricultural products from Roof Top Greenhouse (RTG) in Mediterranean urban areas.Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture(online first). DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.5736
  • Farreny R, Oliver-Solà J, Escuder-Bonilla S, Roca-Martí M, Sevigné E, Gabarrell X, Rieradevall J (2012) The metabolism of cultural services. Energy and water flows in museums. Energy and buildings 47:98-106.
  • Sanyé E, Oliver-Solà J, Gasol CM, Farreny R, Rieradevall J, Gabarrell X (2012) Life cycle assessment of energy flow and packaging use in food purchasing. Journal of Cleaner Production 25:51-59.
  • Farreny R, Morales-Pinzón T, Guisasola A, Tayà C, Rieradevall J, Gabarrell X (2011) Roof selection for rainwater harvesting: Quantity and quality assessments in Spain. Water Research 45 (10): 3245-3254
  • Farreny R, Gabarrell X, Rieradevall J (2011) Cost-efficiency of rainwater harvesting strategies in dense Mediterranean neighbourhoods. Resources, Conservation and Recycling (55) 686-694
  • Angrill S, Farreny R, Gasol CM, Gabarrell X, Viñolas B, Josa A and Rieradevall J (2011) Environmental analysis of rainwater harvesting infrastructures in diffuse and compact urban models of Mediterranean climate. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment DOI: 10.1007/s11367-011-0330-6.
  • Farreny R, Oliver-Solà J, Montlleó M, Escribà E, Gabarrell X, Rieradevall J (2011) Transition Towards Sustainable Cities: Opportunities, Constraints and Strategies in Planning. A Neighbourhood Eco-Design Case Study in Barcelona (Spain) Environment and Planning A 43(5) 1118 - 1134
  • Farreny R, Oliver-Solà J, Montlleó M, Escribà E, Gabarrell X, Rieradevall J (2011) The ecodesign and planning of sustainable neighbourhoods: the Vallbona case study (Barcelona). Informes de la Construcción. Vol. 63, EXTRA, 115-124
  • Oliver-Solà J, Josa A, Arena AP, Gabarrell X, Rieradevall J (2011) The GWP-Chart: An environmental tool for guiding urban planning processes. Application to concrete sidewalks. Cities, 28(3): 245-250
  • Rives J, Rieradevall J, Gabarrell X. LCA comparison of container systems in municipal solid Waste management. Waste Management, Volume 30, Issue 6, June 2010, pages 949-957.
  • Martínez-Blanco J, Colón J, Gabarrell X, Font X, Sánchez A, Artola A, Rieradevall J. The use of life cycle assessment for the comparison of biowaste composting at home and full scale. Waste Management, Volume 30, Issue 6, June 2010, pages 983-994.
  • Núñez, M., García-Lozano, R., Boquera, P., Gabarrell, X., Rieradevall, J., 2009. Temporary structures as a generator of waste in covered trade fairs. Waste Management 29: 2011-2017
  • Iriarte, A., Gabarrell X., Rieradevall, J., LCA of selective waste collection systems in dense urban areas. Waste Management. Volume 29, Issue 2. February 2009, pages 903-914.
  • Oliver-Solà, J., Josa, A., Gabarrell, X., Rieradevall, J., 2009. Environmental optimization of concrete sidewalks in urban areas. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14(4), 302-312.
  • Oliver-Solà, J., Rieradevall, J., Gabarrell, X., 2009. Environmental impacts of the infrastructure for district heating in urban neighbourhoods. Energy Policy 37(11): 4711-4719.
  • Oliver-Solà, J., Gabarrell, X., Rieradevall, J., 2009. Environmental impacts of natural gas Distribution networks within urban neighborhoods. Applied Energy 86(10), 1915-1924.
  • Dagmar Haase, Neele Larondelle, et al (2014). A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio, 43 (4), 413-433.
  • Francesc Baró, Lydia Chaparro, Erik Gómez-Baggethun, Johannes Langemeyer, David J Nowak, Jaume Terradas, 2014.  Contribution of ecosystem services to air quality and climate change mitigation policies: the case of urban forests in Barcelona, Spain. . Ambio, 43 (4), 466-479.
  • Johannes Langemeyer, Monika Joanna Latkowska, Erik Nicolas Gómez-Baggethun, 2016. Ecosystem servicesfrom urban gardens. Urban Allotment Gardens in Europe; Bell, S., Fox-Kämper, R., Keshavarz, N., Benson, M., Caputo, S., Noori, S., Voigt, A., Eds. 115-141
  • Núñez, M., Oliver-Solà, J., Rieradevall, J., Gabarrell, X., 2009. Water Management in Integrated Service Systems: Accounting for Water Flows in Urban Areas. Water Resources Management, Published online 02 October 2009.
  • Demertzi M, Sierra-Pérez J, Paulo JA, et al (2017) Environmental performance of expanded cork slab and granules through life cycle assessment. JClean Prod 145:294–302. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.071
  • Liu L, Li H, Lazzaretto A, et al (2017) The development history and prospects of biomass-based insulation materials for buildings. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 69:912–932. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.140
  • Mastrucci A, Popovici E, Marvuglia A, et al (2015) GIS-based Life Cycle Assessment of urban building stocks retrofitting A bottom-up framework applied to Luxembourg. 47–56.
  • Sierra-Pérez J, Boschmonart-Rives J, Dias AC, Gabarrell X (2016a) Environmental implications of the use of agglomerated cork as thermal insulation in buildings. J Clean Prod 126:97–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.146
  • Sierra-Pérez J, López-Forniés I, Boschmonart-Rives J, Gabarrell X (2016b) Introducing eco-ideation and creativity techniques to increase and diversify the applications of eco-materials: The case of cork in the building sector. J Clean Prod 137:606–616. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.121

 

 

 


Software

Word, excel or similar


Language list

Name Group Language Semester Turn
(TEm) Theory (master) 1 English second semester afternoon