Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
4313796 Quality of Food of Animal Origin | OB | 0 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
There are no pre-requirements. It is recommended to have knowledge of statistical and scientific communication, both oral and written.
Contextualization
It is generally about developing a final project work, individually, and guided by the assigned tutor, which might be experimental or not, depending on the intended purpose. An issue directly related to the improvement, management and/or quality control of raw materials or processed foods must be addressed. At the end of the module, the student will prepare a written report of the work that will be presented and defended orally to an evaluation committee in public session.
Objective
Preparation and defense of a final master project, in the field of knowledge, defined in the Master Report.
Thematic Description
This work will incorporate knowledge acquired in the modules comprising the master. The work, which may be experimental or not, depending on the intended purpose, should address a topic directly related to the improvement, management and / or quality control of raw materials or processed foods. This work will be performed at the UAB facilities and/or at other public and private institutions, prior establishment of a relevant agreement if required.
This final master project will be experimental, bibliographic, or applicative and will be divided in:
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Tutoring with director/directors of the FMP | 90 | 3.6 | |
Type: Supervised | |||
Training in the use of equipment, technology or work methods | 10 | 0.4 | |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Self-study and specific development of the activities of the FMP by the student | 274 | 10.96 |
In the final master project module the following teaching methodology will be used:
1. Reading articles/ reports of interest
2. Practical activities
3. Final Master Project preparation
4. Individual study
5. Performance of work
6. Participation in complementary activities
7. Oral presentations
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Evaluation of the committee | 70% | 0.5 | 0.02 | CA06, CA07, SA18, SA19, SA20 |
Report of the director/tutor | 30% | 0.5 | 0.02 | CA06, CA07, KA12, SA16, SA17, SA18, SA19, SA20 |
The evaluation of the training activities programmed in the TFM module will be carried out as follows:
1. Evaluation by the committee (70% of the final grade), distributed as follows:
i) Evaluation of the TFM report submitted by the student (70% of the committee´s grade).
ii) Communication and oral defense (30% of the committee´s grade).
2. Evaluation by the director / tutor /s (30% of the final grade) distributed as follows:
i) If the work is carried out in the UAB, the director´s report will have a weight of 30%
ii) If the work is carried out outside the UAB, there will be two reports: a report submitted by the director/s and another submitted by the academic tutor, with a joint weight of 30%, distributed as follows:
(1) Director's report (70%).
(2) Academic tutor´s report (30%).
This subject does not contemplate a single assessment system
The bibliography will be recommended in each case by the FMP director(s) according to the nature and specific characteristics of the assigned work.
Does not apply
Information on the teaching languages can be checked on the CONTENTS section of the guide.