Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
4313767 Spanish Language, Hispanic Literature and Spanish as a Foreign Language | OT | 0 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
They are not considered.
The subject is divided into two parts. In the first part, the aim is that students can explain grammar to foreign individuals who need to learn the language in an instrumental and operational manner.
To do this, they will need to be capable of teachin grammatical forms clearly, coherently, and rigorously , knowing how to provide examples, and designing grammatical activities to facilitate the processing of these forms.
In the second part, the goal is for the student to become familiar with the criteria and assessment methods proposed in institutions and curriculum designs to evaluate the learning of a foreign language, particularly Spanish.
First part
The grammatical instruction in ELE: metalinguistic reflection and significant practice applied to different grammatical problems of Spanish
1. To review the evolution of the methodological approaches of recent years in relation to grammar and develop criteria to analyze the most common grammatical descriptions in manuals and pedagogical grammars.
Second part
The assesment in ELE
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Master classes and seminars | 66 | 2.64 | 6, 8, 11, 12, 17 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Supervised Practices | 40 | 1.6 | 5, 10, 12 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Students' autonomous workload | 35 | 1.4 | 11, 17 |
The activities are divided into master class, readings, practices and autonomous work depending on the type of activity: directed, supervised or autonomous. The teacher will carry out practices related to the teaching or evaluation of ELE.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Exam of the first part | 50% | 3 | 0.12 | 2, 5, 10, 11, 16 |
Exam of the second part | 30% | 3 | 0.12 | 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 18 |
Readings in the first part | 10% | 2 | 0.08 | 7, 11, 12, 13, 15 |
Understanding readings about assesment in ELE | 10% | 1 | 0.04 | 4, 6, 11, 14, 17 |
Two tests about theory will be carried out related to each of the thematic parts and some questions about readings will be asked. These tests will be done at the end of each part. In the case that there is a student abroad will be provided another way to show the contents taught in the subject.
Single assessment
Two tests about theory will be carried out at the same time at the end of the course.
In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.
First part:
ALONSO RAYA, Rosario (2004). «Procesamiento de input y actividades gramaticales», RedELE [en línea]
BRUCART, José María (2005). “La gramática en ELE y la teoría lingüística: coincidencias y discrepancias”, RedELE (Revista electrónica de didáctica del español como lenguaextranjera), 3. http://www.sgci.mec.es/redele/revista3
CASTAÑEDA, Alejandro (ed.) (2014). Enseñanza de la gramática avanzada de ELE, Madrid: Sgel
IBARRECHE ANTUÑANO, Iraide et al. (2019). Lingüística cogniyiva y español LE/L2, Oxford:Taylor & Francis, Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
LLOPIS, Reyes, Juan Manuel REAL y José Plácido RUIZ CAMPILLO (2012). Qué gramática enseñar, qué gramática aprender, Madrid: Edinumen
RUIZ CAMPILLO, José Plácido (2007). «Gramática cognitiva y ele», Marco ELE, Núm. 5, jun-dic.2007. http://marcoele.com/numeros/numero-5/
SWAN, Michael (2005). «Legislation by Hypotesis: The Case of Task-Based Instruction», Applied Linguistics 26/3:376-401. Oxford University Press.
SWAN, Michael (1985). «A critical look at the communicative approach 1», ELTJournal 39/1 pp. 2–12, http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/39/1/2?ijkey=bddnGOKiVIilX6O&keytype=ref
SWAN, Michael (1985b). «A critical look at the communicative approach 2» (ELTJournal 39/2 pp 77–87, 1985) http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/39/2/76?ijkey=qJ4yQ0kzoZ5Xxlw&keytype=ref
Second part:
ANTÓN, Marta (2019). Evaluación. En Muñoz Basols, J., Gironzetti E. y Lacorte, M. (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Language Teaching. 109-123. New York: Routledge.
BORDÓN, Teresa (2004). "Panorama histórico del desarrollo de algunas de las cuestiones fundamentales en la evaluación de segundas lenguas". En Carabela, n.º 55, Madrid: SGEL, pp. 5-29. https://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/carabela/pdf/55/55_005.pdf
CARBÓ, Carme (2017). Tipos de evaluación, instrumentos y herramientas. En C. Carbó, J-M- García y R. Lucas (Coords) Metodología y evaluación de las lenguas, 183-192. Vaencia: Conselleria d’Educació, Investigació, Cultura i Esport.
CONSEJO DE EUROPA (2002). Marco común europeo de referencia para las lenguas: aprendizaje, enseñanza y evaluación. Madrid. Ministerio de Educación, cultura y deporte, Subdirección General de Cooperación Internacional y Grupo Anaya.
http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/marco/default.htm
CONSEJO DE EUROPA (2018). CEFR Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Versión en español (2021).
EGUILUZ, Juán and de VEGA, Clara María (1992). "La evaluación: criterios para la valoración de la expresión escrita y de la expresión oral" Taller del consejo de Europa: Aprendizaje y enseñanza del español-lengua extranjera en la enseñanza secundaria y en la educación de adultos. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.
GALINDO, M. Mar and PASTOR, Susana (2007). "La evaluación en elaprendizaje y la enseñanza del español como L2/SL". XVIII Congreso Internacional de ASELE, Universidad de Alicante. http://marcoele.com/xviii-congreso-internacional-de-asele/
INSTITUTO CERVANTES (2006). Plan curricular del Instituto Cervantes. Madrid: Instituto Cervantes, Biblioteca Nueva, 3vol. http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/plan_curricular/default.htm
WANG, Mengmen (2023). "Bridging assessment and learning: A cognitive diagnostic analysis of a large-scale Spanish proficiency test". Porta Linguarum An International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, (40), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi40.15930
There is no specific program, except the TEAMS platform to meet online with the students.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TEm) Theory (master) | 1 | Spanish | second semester | afternoon |