Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
4313816 School Library and Reading Promotion | OB | 0 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
None
This is a compulsory module whose main objective is to provide an insight into how to plan reading education at schools and at other social establishments.
Current research findings will be presented so as to set the ground for understanding how children learn to read (how they comprehend and interpret different types of texts), learn by reading (across the curriculum) and read for pleasure (how they acquire reading habits and how teachers can promote them).
Participants will also learn to develop strategies to diagnose how reading is planned at school and at other milieus.
Participants will also discuss what a School Reading Plan should be like if it is aimed to become a pedagogical tool to set school objectives, methodologies and strategies to promote reading education.
In addition, some reading plans from other parts of the world will be known in order to observe their own characteristics and the possible learnings that can be derived from them.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Activities targeted at analysing, selecting and assessing classroom materials. | 18 | 0.72 | CA05, CA06, KA07, KA08, SA08, SA09 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Participation in online debate forums, elaboration of course assignments and discussion of course compulsory readings. | 82 | 3.28 | CA05, CA06, KA07, KA08, SA08, SA09, SA10 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Reading the articles and materials related to the contents covered in the course. | 50 | 2 | CA04, KA07, SA08 |
Lectures will combine theory and practice and will pose the following tasks:
Our teaching approach and assessment procedures may be altered if public health authorities impose new restrictions on public gatherings for COVID-19
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Analysis of reading plans. | 10% | 0 | 0 | CA04, CA05, CA06, KA07, KA08, SA08, SA09, SA10 |
Assessment of strategies used to teach reading, to search for information and to promote reading for pleasure. | 10% | 0 | 0 | CA04, CA05, KA08, SA08, SA10 |
Designing a project to teach reading. | 20% | 0 | 0 | CA04, CA05, CA06, KA07, KA08, SA08, SA09, SA10 |
Diagnosing needs following the criteria set in class. | 20% | 0 | 0 | CA04, SA10 |
Participation in the activities set during face-to-face lecturers and in the digital forums. | 20% | 0 | 0 | CA06, SA09 |
Presentation of the rationale and the activities of a project to teach reading. | 20% | 0 | 0 | CA06, KA08, SA08 |
Evaluation
The evaluation will be based on the delivered activities that will be commented on by the teaching staff. The final mark will be the weighted average of the planned activities, having to obtain a minimum of 5 on a scale of 10 in each of them.
Class attendance is mandatory. You must have attended at least 80% of face-to-face classes.
Participation in the forums and in the classroom will be taken into account by assessing the involvement of the students in the activities carried out during the classes and, if requested, later in a virtual format. For the participation in the forums, a margin of one week will be left, as participation in them is also mandatory and the personal and well-founded opinion will be valued as well as the contributions, criticism and observations of the colleagues' interventions. Interventions in the forum are not recoverable.
The teacher will return the assessment activities within a period of no more than twenty normal days of the academic calendar.
In the case of continuous assessment, students who do not deliver the assessment activities or whose delivery percentage does not exceed 20% will be recorded as NON-EVALUABLE.
The only recoverable activities are:
-The activity of analyzing reading plans
-Strategy evaluation activities on the teaching of reading, the search for information and the taste for reading.
- The design of a reading teaching project.
-The presentation of the reading teaching project and its activities.
-The activities and participation in the various forums.
If someone were to suspend the module, recovery would be carried out in June by handing in a complementary work around the content of the module following the parameters of the proposed group work. In case of plagiarism or copying of works, as long as the provenance of the referenced fragments is not cited, it will be penalized with a 0 as a grade for the module, with no possibility of recovery.
Single evaluation
In the case of opting to follow a single evaluation format, the same evaluation and recovery system will be applied so that for the continuous evaluation but the delivery of the written works, the oral presentations scheduled for the rest of students who follow the continuous evaluation will be done in a single day as well as the different contributions to the forums of the subject. None of these deliveries will receive formative assessment because opting for the single assessment implies renouncing continuous assessment. In the case of opting for a single evaluation, the evidence that will be evaluated will be the following:
Oral defense of your reading program proposal: 15%
Research and written presentation of the chosen reading program: 20%
Individual written interventions, in format and completion of the virtual forums: 15%
Individual programming work for the Reading Plan and Reading Plan: 25%
Final interview where the student's knowledge and ability to apply the content will be assessed: 25%
Blasco, A.; Durban, G. (2011). Competència informacional: del currículum a l’aula. Barcelona. Publicacions de Rosa Sensat.
Cairney, T.H. (1992): Enseñanza de la comprensión lectora. Madrid:Morata, 1992). CAMPS, A. (comp.) (2003): Seqüències didàctiques per aprendre a escriure. Barcelona: Graó.
Cassany, D. (2011): En_línia. Llegir i escriure a la xarxa. Barcelona. Graó.
Chartier, A.M. (2004): Enseñar a leer y escribir. Una aproximación histórica. México: Fondo de cultura económica.
Chartier, A.M.; J.Hebrard (1994): Discursos sobre la lectura (1880-1980) . Barcelona: Gedisa.
Coiro, J. (2003): «Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies». The Reading Teacher [article en línia]. Núm. 56, p. 458-464. Versió en espanyol publicada a Eduteka (2003).
Colomer, T. (coord) (2008): Lectures adolescents. Barcelona: Graó.
Colomer, T. (2007): Andar entre libros. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2ona ed.
Colomer, T.; A.CAMPS (1991): Ensenyar a llegir, ensenyar a comprendre. Barcelona: Ed.62-Rosa Sensat (Trad.cast. Enseñar a leer, enseñar a comprender. Madrid:Celeste MEC, 1996) Disponible en format digital al web www.gretel.cat
Correro, C.; Portell, J (2023). Lectures que fan lectors. Vic: Eumo
Correro, Cristina; Real, Neus (eds.) (2018). La literatura a l'educació infantil. Barcelona: Associació de Mestres Rosa Sensat (Temes d'Infància, 73)
DDAA. (2011) Marco de referencia para las bibliotecas escolares. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación.DDAA. (2019). El pla valencià del llibre i la lectura. València: Universitat de València. A: https://mobiroderic.uv.es/handle/10550/50751
Duran,T.; Ros, R- (1995): Primeres literatures. Llegir abans de saber llegir. Barcelona: Pirene. (Adapt. castellana: DURAN, T.; R. LÓPEZ (2002): Leer antes de leer. Madrid:Anaya)
Jóvenes y lectura. Fundación Germán Sánchez Ruipérez: https://fundaciongsr.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Jovenes-y-lectura.pdf
Goldin, D.; Kriscautzky, M.; Perelman, F. (coord.) (2012). Las TIC en la escuela, nuevas herramientas para viejos y nuevos problemas. Barcelona: Océano.
Jubany, Jordi (2012). Connecta’t per aprendre. Aprenentatge social i personalitzat. Barcelona: Rosa Sensat.
Lara, T., Zayas i altres (2009). La competencia digital en el área de lengua. Barcelona. Octaedro.
Lankshear, C; Knobel, M. (2008): Nuevos alfabetismos. Su práctica cotidiana y el aprendizaje en el aula. Madrid. Morata.
Lerner, D. (2001): Leer y escribir en la escuela: lo real, lo posible y lo necesario. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Lluch, Gemma (2018). Le lectura entre el paper i les pantalles. Vic: Eumo
Lluch, G. (2012): La lectura al centre. Llegir (i escriure) llibres, pantalles, documents, al Pla de Lectura de Centre. Alzira: Bromera.
Mangel, A. (1998): Historia de la lectura. Madrid: Anaya.
Manresa, M. (2013). L'univers lector adolescent. Dels hàbits de lectura a la intervenció educativa. Barcelona: Rosa Sensat.
Meek, M. (2004): En torno a la cultura escrita. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Ministerio de Educación, Formación profesional y Deportes (2024): https://www.libreria.educacion.gob.es/ca/libro/guia-para-la-elaboracion-de-un-plan-de-fomento-de-la-lectura-en-un-centro-de-educacion-primaria_184437/
Monereo, C. (2005). Internet y competencias básicas. Aprender a colaborar, a comunicarse, a participar, a aprender. Barcelona: Graó.
Moreno, V. (2004): Lectores competentes. Madrid: Anaya
Munita, F. (2023): Yo mediador(a). Barcelona: Octaedro
Petit, M. (1999): Nuevos acercamientos a los jóvenes y la lectura. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Sarland, C. (2003): La lectura en los jóvenes: cultura y respuesta. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Teberosky, A. (amb la col.laboració de T.COLOMER) (2001): Proposta constructivista per aprendre a llegir i a escriure. Barcelona: Vicens Vives
Zayas, F. (1012). 10 idees clau: la competència lectora segons PISA. Reflexions i orientacions. Barcelona: Graó.
Recursos web:
Proyecto de lectura para centros escolares. Fundación Germán Sánchez Ruipérez: http://www.canallector.com/
Pàgina del Departament d’Ensenyament sobre el Pla de lectura de centre. http://www.xtec.cat/web/projectes/lectura/pladelectura
-
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TEm) Theory (master) | 1 | Catalan | first semester | afternoon |