Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
4313782 Cytogenetics and Reproductive Biology | OB | 0 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
There are no prerequisites for taking this course. In spite of this, in order to ensure the proper monitoring of the subject by the student and the achievement of the learning outcomes proposed, it is recommended that the student have some basic knowledge of statistical tools.
On the other hand, it is recommended that students have a minimum knowledge of English.
The objective of the course is:
Topic 1. Statistics:
Familiarize the student in the field of applied statistics in obtaining results from a study in the design of an investigation
That the student continued to describe and justify the statistical methodologies used in an investigation
That the student followed a critical reading and a good interpretation of the results presented in scientific articles on the subject of cytogenetics or the biology of reproduction.
Topic 2. Scientific communication:
Familiarize the student in the techniques and stratègies of scientific communication
Topic 3. Good Scientific Practices Guidlines:
That the student continued to identify the principies in the development of the research activity and to use the behavior ethically acceptable in the planning, development and dissemination of the results of the research paying a special attention on gender perspective.
Topic 1: Statistics
BLOC1. Basics
Introduction to DeduceR Software
Descriptive statistical univariate and bivariate
Inference for a population. Concepts and applications
Inference for two populations. Concepts and applications
Inference for k populations. Concepts and applications
BLOC2. Modeling
Regression model. General concepts of modeling
General Linear Model. Factors and covariates
Logistic regression model. Variable binary response
Poisson regression model. Variable count response
Topic 2: Scientific communication
The summary. The poster. The oral presentation. The articles. Master's degree work. The doctoral thesis
Topic 3: Code of good scientific practices
Description of a research ethic code: How to plan and develop the research. How to register and disseminate the results. How to disseminate, apply and exploit the knowledge derived from the investigation
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Case study of statistics | 15 | 0.6 | 2, 12, 6, 7, 13, 4, 5, 14, 15, 16 |
Code of good practices | 2 | 0.08 | 10, 8, 9, 14, 1 |
Code of good practices Seminar | 1 | 0.04 | 10, 8, 9, 14, 1 |
Practical case of bioethics | 3 | 0.12 | 12, 10, 8, 9, 3, 14, 1 |
Practical sessions of statistics | 14 | 0.56 | 12, 6, 7, 13, 4, 5, 14, 15, 16 |
Proposals for scientific communication | 7 | 0.28 | 12, 6, 7, 13, 3, 4, 5, 11, 14, 15 |
Scientific communication | 12 | 0.48 | 12, 7, 3, 5, 11, 15 |
Statistics | 6 | 0.24 | 2, 12, 6, 7, 13, 4, 5, 14, 15, 16 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Code of good practices | 9.5 | 0.38 | 12, 10, 8, 9, 4, 14, 1 |
Scientific communication | 25 | 1 | 12, 7, 13, 3, 4, 11, 14, 15 |
Statistics | 35 | 1.4 | 2, 12, 6, 7, 13, 3, 5, 14, 15, 16 |
The subject consists of theoretical classes, analysis and commentary of cases proposed in a seminar format, and the analysis and resolution of problems and practices. The following describes the organization and the teaching methodology that will be followed in these three types of training activities.
Theory classes (Themes 1, 2):
The content of the theory program will be taught mainly by the teacher in the form of master classes with audiovisual support. Presentations used in class by the teacher will be previously available on the Virtual Campus of the subject. It is recommended that students print this material and take it to class, to use it as a support when taking notes.
Practical classes (Themes 1, 2):
In addition to the attendance to the theoretical classes the follow-up of the subject will also imply an active role of the student who by THEME 1, will consist of realizing a practice for each block described in the content of the subject, They will apply the concepts learned as well as the DeduceR software. For SUBJECT 2, you will have to complete a series of scientific content presentation (in text and poster format), as well as the preparation of an oral communication.
Seminars (Theme 3):
Students will acquire the competences of this part of the module by analyzing and making comments on a set of cases during the sessions. This analysis will be reflected in a work that students will individually deliver within the established period, a work that will be evaluated by the teacher.
The subject proposal will be done by the teacher at the beginning of the course. The proposal will include the guidelines and points to deal with.
It is intended that all these activities serve to consolidate the contents previously worked in the theory classes and also for the student to develop the skills to solve problems related to the obtaining and interpretation of statistical data, in the presentation of scientific data and develop A critical spirit in the face of ethical and legal problems related to research in Biomedicine.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Evaluation 1st practical session of statistics | 16% | 3.5 | 0.14 | 2, 12, 6, 7, 13, 3, 4, 5, 14, 15, 16 |
Evaluation and public defence of the 2nd practical session of statistics | 24% | 4 | 0.16 | 2, 12, 6, 7, 13, 3, 4, 5, 14, 15, 16 |
Evaluation of the comments on the case of bioethics | 16% | 3 | 0.12 | 2, 12, 10, 8, 9, 13, 3, 4, 11, 14, 1, 15 |
Evaluation of the public discussion of the case of bioethics | 4% | 1 | 0.04 | 2, 12, 10, 8, 9, 13, 3, 4, 11, 14, 1, 15 |
Evaluation oral communication | 13,6% | 3 | 0.12 | 12, 3, 4, 11, 14, 15 |
Evaluation summary | 13,2% | 3 | 0.12 | 12, 3, 4, 11, 14, 15 |
Poster evaluation | 13,2% | 3 | 0.12 | 12, 3, 4, 11, 14, 15 |
The evaluation of the module will consist of the following activities:
1. Evaluation of the delivered practices (Theme 1): Both practices will be delivered and evaluated by the teacher.
2. Evaluation of the presented works (Theme 2): The student will present a work of scientific content in poster format and summary. This presentation must be original and not presented beforehand. The fulfillment of the delivery period will be considered. The student will also have to do an oral communication of scientific data on a topic previously agreed upon. The visual tools used to communicate the scientific data will be evaluated, as well as the structure of the contents of the talk and its exhibition.
3. Evaluation of the comments to the case proposed (Theme 3): The work presented by each student will be evaluated. The fulfillment of the delivery period will be taken into consideration, so that the work presented later to the discussion of the case in the seminar will not be valid.
Topic 1: Global weight of 40%
The weight in the note of this topic of each one of the evaluation activities will be:
Practice 1: 50%
Practice 2: 50%
Topic 2: Global weight of 40%
The relative weight of each of the assessment activities will be:
Evaluation of the poster: 33%
Summary evaluation: 33%
Assessment of oral communication: 34%
Topic 3: Global weight of 20%
The relative weight of each of the assessment activities will be:
Evaluation of the comments to the case: 100%
In order to pass the subject, students must obtain a global grade equal to or greater than 5 points for the total evaluation test of the module.
The recovery:
There will be a recovery test similar to the one corresponding to each module topic, except those specifically indicated in each case.
To participate in the recovery the students must have been previously evaluated in a set of activities whose weight equals to a minimum of twothirds of the total grade of the subject or module.
Objective of the evaluation tests
The objective of these tests is to evaluate not only that students have acquired the conceptual knowledge of the module but, more importantly, that they have bought them and they know how to integrate and relate to each other. On the other hand, it will also be valued that students use the right terminology when dealing with the issues raised during the evaluation and to argue and discuss critically and rationally the topics covered.
Basic bibliography Subject 1:
Moore, D. S. (2010). The basic practice of Statistics. 5th ed. Freeman and Co.
Vittinghoff, E .; Shiboski, S.C .; Glidden, D.V. and McCulloch, C.F. (2005). Regression Methods in Biostatistics. Linear, Logistic, Survival, and Repeated Measures Models. Springer e-books
Basic bibliography Subject 2:
Briscoe M.H. 1996. Preparing Scientific Illustrations. A guide to better posters, presentations and publications. 2nd Edition. New York. Springer.
Basic bibliography Subject 3:
Code of Good Practices in the Research of the UAB.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAULm) Classroom practices (master) | 1 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |
(SEMm) Seminars (master) | 1 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |
(TEm) Theory (master) | 1 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |