Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2500891 Nursing | FB | 2 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Although there are no specific prerequisites, it is highly recommended that students have successfully completed the first year's subject "Communication and ICT".
V. Henderson (1971) said that communication is the exchange obligation that human beings have with their resemblances; therefore, one of the basic needs of people is to establish effective communication that helps them to relate and achieve good personal growth.
It is known that there are many potential sources of friction and problems in communication. The objective of the Therapeutic Communication program (6 ECTS) is to promote the use of proper abilities to achieve an effective communication with the person who is receiving the nursing care for each situation and / or problem.
An effective communication with the patient, through interpersonal relationships, is considered as the main clinical ability that characterizes the nursing competences and at the same time provides professionals one of the most important satisfactions.
Developing effective communication is a highly complex process. It demands to acquire knowledge and deepening on specific aspects of communication; students must be capable and competent in the profession: "knowledge", "know-how" and "know how to be".
The objective of the subject is to give students the theoretical and practical knowledge needed to offer an integrated, individualized and quality care. Students must study and evaluate all psychosocial aspects that may influence the person, family and community needs.
Concepts' review: Communication. Empathy. Assertiveness. Active listening. Feedback.
1-The Help Relationship: Definition. Help relationship models: Rogers, Peplau, Orlando and Riopelle. Difference between help relationship and social relationship. Phases of the formal help relationship: description, objectives, attitudes of the attended person and attitudes of the professional.
2-The Interview: Definition. Types of interviews. Interview variables: context, characteristics of the attended person and characteristics of the nurse. Goal of the interview. The interview: duration, place and interviewer skills. The questions: type, number, order, formulation. Aspects that may influence the interview. Phases.
3- The Motivational Interview: Definition. The informative model and the motivational model. Factors that may influence the change. Model of Prochasca and DiClemente: phases and nurse's tools.
4- Teamwork: Definition. Difference between group and team. Objective of the teamwork. Composition of the team. Roles in the team. Phases of teamwork. Team's meeting: phases and organization.
5- Illness and Cultural Diversity: Definition of culture, ethnocentrism, cultural relativism, transculturalism and multiculturalism. The Transcultural Nursing (M. Leininger). Factors that nurses must bear in mind. Factors to consider when taking care of people of the most prevalent religions.
6 -How to Give Bad News: Definition. Reasons of discomfort of the professional. Usual fears when facing terminal illness. Six-step protocol to give bad news. People's reactions to bad news: adaptive behaviors and maladaptive behaviors.
7- The Grieving Process: Definition. Types of losses. Reactions to loss. Stages of the grieving process according to Kübler Ross. The conspiracy of silence.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
SPECIALIZED SEMINARS (SESP) | 32.5 | 1.3 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 6, 8, 7, 10, 12, 11, 13 |
THEORY (TE) | 17 | 0.68 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 6, 8, 7, 10, 12, 11, 13 |
Type: Supervised | |||
TUTORIALS | 2 | 0.08 | |
Type: Autonomous | |||
BIBLIOGRAPHIC SEARCH | 5 | 0.2 | 11 |
DOCUMENT PREPARATION | 10 | 0.4 | 12 |
READING ARTICLES / REPORTS OF INTEREST | 5 | 0.2 | 3, 8, 11 |
SELF-STUDY | 71 | 2.84 | 1, 3, 4, 9, 6, 8, 7 |
The teaching typology to be used is mixed
Theoretical classes-the contents of the subject are treated.
Seminars - held in groups of up to 25 students. This activity consists on different exercises related to the theoretical content (simulation, reading texts, viewing videos, etc.)
The distribution of theoretical classes and seminars by topic is shown in the following table:
Themes to work |
Theoretical hours |
Seminar hours |
The Help relationship |
4 |
4,5 |
The Interview (clinical and motivational) |
5 |
4 |
How to Give Bad News and the Grieving process |
4 |
4 |
Illness and cultural diversity |
2 |
2 |
Teamwork |
2 |
2 |
However, there are 4 Laboratory practices (four hours each)where students, in groups, will carry out a simulations of one situation /problem based on the topic to work.
The topics to work in these sessions are:
- The help relationship
- The interview
- Teamwork
- How to give bad news and the grieving process
Students will be asked to do evaluation in pairs and in writing.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Attendance and active participation in classes and seminars | 25% | 3 | 0.12 | 2, 10, 12, 11, 13 |
Practical evaluation: objective and structured evaluation | 35% | 3.5 | 0.14 | 1, 2, 4, 5, 9, 6, 8, 7, 10, 12, 11, 13 |
Written evaluation: Objective test | 40% | 1 | 0.04 | 1, 3, 4, 9, 6, 8, 7, 10, 13 |
This subject does not provide for a single evaluation system.
The evaluation is made up of:
Practical evaluation: objective and structured evaluation (35% grade) It is necessary to have a minimum grade of 5.0 in this section to be able to average it with the rest of the sections that make up the evaluation of the subject :
It will be evaluated through 4 simulations in which the student participates that will be carried out at the end of the sessions referring to the topics being evaluated. Its completion is mandatory and the student's non-attendance at the session will be scored with a 0.
The aspects to be evaluated vary depending on the topic to be discussed. The student will have the situation to work on and the evaluation grid that the teacher will use in the Moodel of the subject with sufficient advance notice.
After completing the test, the teacher will give feedback to the group of students on the aspects observed in the simulation.
Attendance and active participation in classes and seminars (25 %) It is necessary to have a minimum grade of 5.0 in this section to be able to average it with the rest of the sections that make up the evaluation of the subject :
This is a continuous evaluation throughout all the seminars of the subject.
The teacher will award an individual grade based on the following criteria:
- Attendance at the sessions and compliance with the schedule
- Participation (mainly participation in the activities of the seminars, although active listening and assertiveness of the student will also be taken into account)
- Level of approach to the evaluation of the teacher in the peer evaluation carried out in the applied theoretical evaluation
Written evaluation through objective tests (40 %) It is necessary to have a minimum grade of 5.0 in this section to be able to average it with the rest of the sections that make up the evaluation of the subject :
A knowledge test will be taken at the end of the subject. In order to prepare it correctly, it is essential consult the recommended bibliography .
Attendance at the seminars is mandatory.
Any inappropriate attitude or behavior will subtract 0.5 points/time detected from the final grade (mobile phone use, eating or drinking in the classroom...)
No lack of respect for classmates or teachers will be tolerated. Homophobic, sexist or racist attitudes will not be tolerated either. Any student in whom any of the attitudes described above is detected will be graded with a failure in the subject and will not have access to the recovery test .
Any indication of plagiarism or academic dishonesty will result in failure of the subject and you will not have access to the recovery test.
Students who do not attend 30% of the sessions will be considered non-evaluable.
Recovery:
Students who have not passed the subject through continuous evaluation and who:
- They have attended at least 75% of the seminar sessions
- Have a positive evaluation of attendance and active participation in classes and seminars
- Have a positive evaluation in the practical evaluation
- That they have carried out all the evaluative tests
They may take a final recovery test.
No student will be accepted to take this test to "raise grade"
Qualifications
According to agreement 4.4 of the Board of Governors 17/11/2010 of the regulations of evaluation, the qualifications will be:
Fail: From 0 to 4.9
Pass: 5.0 to 6.9
Remarkable: from 7.0 to 8.9
Excellent: 9.0 to 10
Honors will only be assigned to those students who, being among the three best grades in the group and being within the grade range between 9 and 10, accredit the completion of other activities such as attendance at student conferences, nursing conferences in the that nursing students can attend, conferences, etc.
Borrell F. Manual de entrevista clínica. Barcelona: Doyma; 1994
Buckman R. Com donar les males notícies. Una guia per a professionals de la salut. Barcelona: EUMO Editorial; 1998
Cibanal L, Arce MC, Carballal MC. Técnicas de comunicación y Relación de Ayuda en Ciencias de la Salud. Madrid: Elsevier España S.A; 2014
Chalifour J. La Relación de Ayuda en Cuidados de Enfermeria. Una perspectiva Holística y Humanista. Barcelona: S.G. Editores S.A; 1994
Henderson V. Principios basicos de los cuidados de enfermeria. Ginebra: Consejo Internacional de Enfermeria (CIE); 1971
LEYVA MORAL,J. Sentir-Crear-Cuidar. Relatos reales sobre VIH que promueven la empatía. Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona; 2023
Madrid Soriano J. Los procesos de la relación de ayuda. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer S.A.; 2005
Peplau H. Relaciones interpersonales en Enfermería. Barcelona: Salvat; 1990
Riopelle L., Grondin L., Phaneuf M. Cuidados de enfermería. Un proceso centrado en las necesidades de la persona.Madrid: McGraw-Hill-Interamericana; 1993
Surdo E. La magia de trabajar en equipo. Madrid:S&A Cierzo; 1997.
Tazón Ansola MP i Col. Relación y Comunicación.Madrid: Obra Enfermería 21. Difusión Avances de Enfermería. (DAE S.L.); 2009
Vallverde Gefaell C. Comunicación Terapéutica en Enfermería. Madrid:Difusión Avances de Enfermería. (DAE); 2007
No specific software is required
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(SEM) Seminars | 101 | Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 102 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 103 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 104 | Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 105 | Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 106 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 107 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 108 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 109 | Catalan | second semester | afternoon |
(SEM) Seminars | 110 | Catalan | second semester | afternoon |
(TE) Theory | 101 | Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 102 | Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 103 | Spanish | second semester | afternoon |