Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2503710 Geography, Environmental Management and Spatial Planning | OB | 3 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
This subject has no specific prerequisites. However, its teaching is designed for third year students and therefore it is assumed that the knowledge taught in the first and second year subjects has been acquired. It is necessary to have skill in the use of Geographical Information Systems. This last point is essential.
The main objective of this subject is for students to acquire the necessary knowledge to have a critical view of territorial planning and to be able to value the environmental content with which the territory is structured.
To achieve this main objective, the following objectives are proposed during the course:
Unit 1: Introduction to Planning, Planning and Evaluation
Unit 2: Planning Process
Unit 3: Planning
Unit 4: Evaluation
Unit 5: Evaluation process
Unit 6: Use of Evaluation
Unit 7: Ethics in Planning, Planning and Evaluation
Unit 8: Practical Cases and Case Studies
Topic 9: Trends and Challenges in Planning, Planning and Evaluation
Topic 10: The local level in climate change mitigation and adaptation policies
Topic 11: Development of mitigation and adaptation actions to climate change
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Practical sessions (PAUL) | 16.5 | 0.66 | |
Theoretical lessons (TE) | 28.5 | 1.14 | SM26, SM26 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Monitoring of practices and reports | 20 | 0.8 | KM34, KM34 |
Recognition of the study area | 5 | 0.2 | KM29, KM29 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Preparation of materials and study | 35 | 1.4 | KM29, KM29 |
Writing the course report | 40 | 1.6 | CM20, SM26, CM20 |
In the first sessions of the subject, the theoretical training is done to give way to a field trip and the preparation of a municipal plan to fight against climate change or an emergency plan for harvesting that will be followed in the tutorials.
At the beginning of the course, the teacher will explain the protocol of measures and good practices for field trips.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Attendance and active participation in tutorials and field work | 20% | 0 | 0 | CM20 |
Course work | 45% | 0 | 0 | CM20, KM34 |
Exam on contents taught in the theoretical sessions | 20% | 5 | 0.2 | KM29, KM34 |
Public presentation of the work | 15% | 0 | 0 | SM26 |
The evaluation of the subject is based on:
All evaluable activities can be recovered, except for presentations made in the classroom, which do not have the possibility of being made outside the initial order, the field trip, which for obvious reasons is only done on the days it is scheduled, and tutorials.
To pass the subject you must have a minimum grade of 3.5 in each of the three evaluable activities, regardless of the weight they have in the final grade, and have attended inexcusably the field trip and tutorials.
The Not evaluable qualification will be obtained if no activity has been delivered or only the first activity has been delivered. Therefore, having delivered two or more activities implies that the course has been followed and the qualification to be obtained will be passed (10-5) or suspended (4.8-0).
Finally, the student must take into account the face-to-face activities of compulsory attendance, without which he will not be able to have the final evaluation of the subject:
At the time of carrying out each evaluation activity, the teacher will inform the students (Moodle) of the procedure and date of review of the grades.
The copying or plagiarism of material, both in the case of works and in the case of exams, constitute a crime that will be sanctioned with a zero to the activity. In case of recidivism, the whole subject will be suspended. We remind you that it is considered a "copy" a work that reproduces all or a large part of the work of another colleague. "Plagiarism" is the fact of presenting all or part of a text of an author as one'sown, without citing the sources, whether on paper or in digital format. See UAB documentation on "plagiarism" at: http://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_01.html
This subject does not include single assessment
Abellà Masdeu, Ester. SIG per al pacte d'alcaldies. Eina de consulta i presa de decisions. 2020. (1373 Màster Universitari en Geoinformació) <https://ddd.uab.cat/record/231402> [Consulta: 24 juny 2023].
Generalitat de Catalunya i Institut d'Estudis Catalans. (2016). Tercer informe sobre el canvi Climàtic a Catalunya. <http://bit.ly/2kL9PR9> [Consulta: 24 juny 2023].
To write the report it is necessary to use the GIS tools that the student may have on his computer or use the software available in the computer rooms of the faculty
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 1 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 1 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |