Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2500261 Education Studies | OB | 3 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
None
This subject, compulsory in the third course of Pedagogy aims to train guidance practitioners working at schools in collaboration with teachers, families and other professionals linked with the school and the territory. Foundations of guidance will be considered in all educational compulsory stages and also resources, tools and colaboration stratgegies, from an inclusive and non-discriminatory vision. Students at the end of the subject will have a general overview of how to conduct guidance actions in this context. This subject, together with "Vocational Guidance" constitute the foundation of the metion on the 4th. grade entitled "Educational Guidance" .
PART A
1. Principles and foundations of educational guidance.
2. Educational guidance and gender perspective.
3. Models and aproaches in educational guidance.
4. Tecniques, resources, programmes and tools in educational guidance.
PART B
5. Tutoring action and tutoring.
6. Family guidance, mediation and conflict.
7. Guidance, tutorial action and tutoring at the inclusive school.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Class activities | 0 | 0 | 6, 13, 19, 18 |
Debates | 30 | 1.2 | |
Group work | 15 | 0.6 | 22, 12, 6, 13, 19, 20, 21 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Assignments | 30 | 1.2 | |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Student work | 75 | 3 | 22, 11, 6, 13, 19 |
The student will lead the learning process and under this premise the methodology was planned.
The methodology used, which is evident in the diversity of programmed activities, aims to serve the entire student body, facilitating opportunities for participation. Different languages are used in the presentations and resources used, a diversity of work materials and a cooperative methodology in the classroom sessions to facilitate the participation of all the students. The teaching materials are accessible to all the students.
During the teaching-learning process, the students have individual and group support and tutoring.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Part A: exam of contents. Individual activity. | 25% | 0 | 0 | 2, 1, 3, 22, 12, 11, 8, 10, 6, 24, 14, 16, 17, 20, 21, 4 |
Part A: group task. Group activity. | 25% | 0 | 0 | 5, 22, 12, 11, 9, 10, 7, 6, 15, 21, 23 |
Part B: exam of contents. Individual activity. | 25% | 0 | 0 | 12, 6, 13, 19, 18, 20, 21 |
Part B: group work. Group activity. | 25% | 0 | 0 | 12, 6, 13, 19, 18, 20, 21 |
The evaluation will be developed during the subject and along the academic course through the activities shown in the table below:
The qualifications of each of the assessment activities will be published in the 20 days following the delivery. Students wishing to review the results must do so within 15 days after their publication.
All those students with a successful follow-up of the subject and with some pending assignment will be allowed to pass the subject though the redesign or improvement of those failed assignments. Likewise, the recovery date of all the parts of the subject will be February 4, 2025.
The mark wil be the mean of qualifications of both parts A and B of the subject. Marks will be considered when doing the mean only if each part of the subject reach a 5 out of 10. Pass will require a minimum of 5.
If the student does not submit any of the compulsory evaluation evidence, the final grade of the subject will not be evaluable.
Copy of any part of an assignment, essays or examinations constitute a crime that can represent to suspend the subject (more information in: http://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_0 1.html).
In all the activities (individual and in group) the linguistic correction, the writing and the formal aspects of presentation will be taken into account. Students must be able to express themselves fluently and correctly and must show a high degree of understanding of academic texts. An activity can be returned, or suspended, if the teacher considers that it does not meet these linguistic requirements. For this reason, before submitting a learning evidence, check that thesources, notes, citations andbibliographic references have been correctly written following the APA regulations. and according to the documentation that is summarized in UAB sources: https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/recdoc/2016/145881/citrefapa_a2016.pdf; https://www.uab.cat/web/estudia-i-investiga/com-citar-i-elaborar-la-bibliografia-1345708785665.html; https://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_03.html
To pass this subject, an attitude compatible with the educational profession must be demonstrated. Therefore, it will be valued that the student shows good general communicative competence, both orally and in writing, and a good command of the language or the vehicular languages that appear in the teaching guide. Likewise, they must show attitudes of active listening, participation, empathy and respect throughout the course.Other skills such as: active listening, respect, participation, cooperation, empathy, kindness, punctuality, not judging, arguing, proper use of mobile phones and computers will be taken into account.
SINGLE EVALUATION
The evidence of the evaluation must be delivered on January 21, 2025, coinciding with the completion of the evaluation test at the end of part B. This evaluation includes:
To pass the subject, a minimum score of 5 must be achievedin each ofthe evidence of the single assessment. The subject will be approved with a minimum score of 5.
The recovery date for the single assessment will be February 4, 2025. The same recovery system will apply as for the continuous assessment.
The review of the final qualification follows the same procedure as for the continuous assessment.
For more information on the general evaluation criteria and guidelines of the Faculty of Education Sciences, please consult the following link: https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/graus/informacio-academica/avaluacio/en-que-consisteix-l-avaluacio-1345725434468.html
Basic readings
Agud, I. Alimbau, N., Caravaca, A., Chamorro, C., Gavaldà, X., Llos, B. Quilabert, E. i Sánchez, A. (2021). La Coeducació a Catalunya: Pràctiques de referència i reptes. Intered, Plataforma Unitària Contra Les Violències De Gènere. https://competenciesiepd.blog.pangea.org/files/2021/11/Coeducacio_Catalunya_OK_alta.pdf
Amber, D., & Martos, M. A. (2017). Ámbitos y funciones de los orientadores para la mejora educativa en secundaria en contextos retantes. Una mirada cruzada entre orientadores y directivos Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 21(4), 419-437. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/567/56754639022.pdf
Brown, C., Olmos Rueda, P., Costas Batlle, I., & Gairín Sallán, J. (2021). Introduction to the special issue: a conceptual framework for researching the risks to early leaving. Journal of Education and Work, 34(7-8), 723-739. 10.1080/13639080.2021.2003007
Diputació de Barcelona (2007). Participación y corresponsabilidad. Los proyectos educativos de ciudad. Balance del Programa de Actuación del Área de Educación 2004-2007. Diputació de Barcelona. https://www.diba.cat/documents/113226/71b0ba6e-3a46-426b-ba7a-0f151f01ee30
Durán, D., Giné, C., & Marchesi, A. (2010). Educació Inclusiva. Guia per a l’anàlisi, la reflexió i la valoració de pràctiques inclusives. Generalitat deCatalunya. Departament d’Educació. https://repositori.educacio.gencat.cat/handle/20.500.12694/243
Gairín, J. (Coord.) (2015). Manual integrado de acción tutorial. Ed. Tecnológica de Costa Rica. https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/llibres/2015/143647/ideas_libro_miat.pdf
Gairín, J., & Olmos, P. (2022). Disminuir el abandono escolar y mejorar la persistencia. Causas, consecuencias y estrategias de intervención. Narcea.
Figueras, P. (2007). Ciudades educadoras, una apuesta por la educación. Participación Educativa, 6, noviembre 2007, pp. 22-27 (MONOGRÁFICO). https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar/234925
García Nieto, N. (2002). La Orientación Educativa en la formación de los actuales educadores. Revista Complutense de Educación, 13(1), 251-279. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=797773
Grañeras, M. & Parras, A. (Coords.) (2009). Orientación educativa: fundamentos teóricos, modelos institucionales y nuevas perspectivas. CIDE. Ministerio de Educación. Gobierno de España. Secretaría General Técnica. http://www.educacion.gob.es/cide/espanol/publicaciones/estudios/inv2008oeftminp/inv2008oeftminppc.pdf
López, S., Navarro, J., & Escarbajal, A. (2023). La formación profesional como palanca para la inclusión. Narcea.
Martín, E. & Solé, I. (Cords.) (2011). Orientación Educativa. Modelos y estrategias de intervención. Graó. https://sede.educacion.gob.es/publiventa/PdfServlet?pdf=VP14523.pdf&area=E
Molina Contreras, D.L. (2004). Concepto de orientación educativa: Diversidad y aproximación. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 33,6 1-22. http://www.rieoei.org/deloslectores/736Molina108.PDF
Olmos Rueda, P. (2020). La acción tutorial en el marco de la orientación escolar. Departament de Pedagogia Aplicada. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. https://ddd.uab.cat/record/234861?ln=ca
Olmos Rueda, P. (Coord.), et al. (2021). Proposta d'orientació i acció tutorial. Estratègies per a l'acció. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Disponible a: https://ddd.uab.cat/record/238996
Olmos Rueda, P., & Gairín Sallán, J. (2021). Understanding and intervening in the personal challenges and social relationships risk categories to early leaving. Journal of Education and Work, 34(7-8), 855-871. 10.1080/13639080.2021.1997016
Pernas, B., & Núñez, F. (2014). Orientación educativa sin sesgo de género antes de la Universidad. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. https://sede.educacion.gob.es/publiventa/PdfServlet?pdf=VP16697.pdf&area=E
Complementary readings.
Álvarez, M., Riart, J., Martínez, M. I., & Bisquerra, R. (2001). El modelo de programas. A, R. Bisquerra (Coord). Modelos de orientación psicopedagógica (pp. 85-101). Práxis.
Antúnez, S. (2007). La transición entre etapas. Reflexiones y prácticas. Ed. Graó.
Calderón, I, (2016). Fracaso escolar y desventaja sociocultural. UOC.
Colomer, F. (2003). Las redes institucionales en educación. En, J. Gairín (Coord.), Estrategias de formación para el cambio organizacional (pp. 319-334). Praxis.
Comellas, M.J. (Coord.) (2002). Las competencias del profesorado para la acción tutorial. Praxis.
Comellas M.J. & Lojo, M. (2006). Un observatorio abierto a la participación. Cuadernos De Pedagogía, 359, 79-84.
Comellas M.J. & Lojo, M. (2009). Un cambio de mirada para afrontar y prevenir la violencia en las escuelas. Octaedro.
Gordó, G. (2010). Centros educativos: ¿islas o nodos? Graó. Comellas, M.J. (2009). Educar en la comunidad y en la familia. Nau llibres.
Hargreaves, A. & Fink, D. (2006). Estrategias de cambio y mejora en educación caracterizadas por su relevancia, difusión y continuidad en el tiempo. Revista de Educación, 339, pp. 43-58. http://dpto.educacion.navarra.es/coeducando/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/De-lengua-diferencia-ycontexto1.pdf
Martin, E., & Solé, I. (Cords.) (2011). Orientación Educativa. Atención a la diversidad y educación inclusiva. Graó.
Martin, E., & Solé, I. (Cords.) (2011). Orientación Educativa. Procesos de innovación y mejora de la enseñanza. Graó
Sánchez, S. (2019). Tú decides, tú cambias, tu vives. Amazon.
Santana Vega, L. (2009). Orientación educativa e intervención psicopedagógica. Cambian los tiempos, cambian las responsabilidades profesionales. Pirámide.
Secanilla E. (2019). Supermentes. Reconocer las altas capacidades en la infancia. Gedisa.
None
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(SEM) Seminars | 311 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 312 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 3 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |