Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2502443 Psychology | OT | 4 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
There are no pre-requisites.
Intervention in Health Psychology is an optional subject in Block A of the "Specialisation in Psychological Intervention in Quality of Life". It is taught in the 2nd semester of the 4th year by lecturers from the Department of Clinical and Health Psychology who specialise in public health. The subject provides methodological tools and technical skills applied to the prevention and promotion of health and wellbeing, from the perspectives of positive psychology, salutogenic models and social determinants of health. It also develops extensively the prevention of addictive behaviours. It includes three thematic blocks:
(a) Conceptual and methodological bases, with emphasis on the development of human strengths from positive psychology, the deepening of the concept of well-being as opposed to quality of life, the most relevant prevention and mental health promotion strategies and programme design and evaluation as a basic methodology in prevention and health promotion.
b) Life skills that contribute to the development of very useful competencies for maintaining health and well-being and that are often part of prevention and health promotion programs such as: emotional intelligence, self-esteem, Mindfulness, and motivational interviewing.
c) Preventive applications in addictive behaviours and other health problems, with emphasis on substance and behavioral addictions and innovative social prescription programs for different health problems.
On completing the subject, students will be able to:
CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL BASES
Theme 1. Positive psychology, quality of life and psychological well-being.
Theme 2. Intersectional perspective on health promotion
Theme 3. Design and planning of health programmes.
Theme 4. Evaluation of health programmes
LIFE SKILLS
Theme 5. Mindfulness
Theme 6. Motivational interviewing
Theme 7: Emotional intelligence
Theme 8: Self-esteem
APPLICATIONS
Theme 9. Prevention of addictions to substances
Theme 10. Prevention of behavioral addictions
Theme 11. Social prescription programs
SEMINARS:
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
(a) Lectures; (b) analysis and debate based on the reading, synthesis and critical evaluation of articles | 24 | 0.96 | 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 19, 20 |
Guidance and tutoring of group work. | 12 | 0.48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 13, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Scheduled tutorials with the teacher for reviewing directed activities. | 12 | 0.48 | 16, 23 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Bibliographical and documentary consultation. | 22 | 0.88 | 2, 6, 7, 12, 15 |
Carrying out group work, posters and oral presentations. | 24 | 0.96 | 2, 3, 8, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 21, 22 |
Comprehensive reading of specific sources. Preparation of oral presentation of articles. | 48 | 1.92 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 19, 20 |
Methodology
The working methodology will combine traditional teaching techniques with methodologies of a more active character.
Directed:
(a) Lectures; (b) analysis and debate based on the reading, synthesis and critical evaluation of articles; and (c) guidance and tutoring of group work.
Supervised:
Scheduled tutorials with the teacher for reviewing directed activities.
Independent:
Bibliographical and documentary consultation.
Comprehensive reading of specific sources.
Preparation of oral presentation of articles.
Carrying out group work, posters and oral presentations.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ev1a | 25% | 1.5 | 0.06 | 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 19, 20, 21 |
Ev1b | 25% | 1.5 | 0.06 | 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21 |
Ev2 | 20% | 1 | 0.04 | 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 14, 20, 22, 23 |
Ev3a | 10% | 2 | 0.08 | 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 |
Ev3b | 20% | 2 | 0.08 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23 |
In addition to these indications, consult the assessment guidelines for all Faculty degrees.
CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT. Evidences of learning
Evidence |
Description |
Authorship |
Weight (%) |
Format |
Presentation method |
Timing |
Ev1a |
multiple-choice test |
individual |
25% |
written |
Attendance |
Week 8 |
Ev1b |
multiple-choice test |
individual |
25% |
written |
Attendance |
Week 19 |
Ev2 |
Oral defence of an artic |
group of 2 |
20% |
Oral & written |
Attendance / Moodle |
Choose topic and week |
Ev3a |
Exhibition-Poster of the programme |
group of 3 |
10% |
Oral & written |
Attendance/ Moodle |
Week 15 o 16 |
Ev3b |
Programme report |
group of 3 |
20% |
written |
Attendance/ Moodle |
Week 16 |
The FINAL MARK is the weighted sum of all the evidence: [(Ev1a*0,25)+(Ev1b*0,25)+(Ev2*0,2)+(Ev3a*0,1)+(Ev3b*0,2)].
Definition of course passed in the continuous assessment: implies the presentation of at least 3 pieces of evidence, with the presentationof Ev1a and Ev1b being compulsory, and a final mark equal to or higher than 5 out of 10. If these requirements are not met, the maximum mark to be recorded on the academic transcript will be 4.5 points. It is not possible to establish systems to improve the final grade in the continuous assessment.
Description of the final recovery system:
Definition of a non-assessable student: evidence with a weight of less than 40%.
Synthesis tests are not foreseen for people with 2nd or subsequent enrolment.
Evidence |
Description |
Weight (%) |
Format |
Presentation method |
Timing |
Eva |
multiple-choice test |
40% |
written |
2 hours |
Week 19 |
Evb |
short-answer questions |
30% |
written |
1 hour |
Week 19 |
Ev2 |
Oral defence of a Programme |
30% |
Oral & written |
30 minutes |
Week 19 |
Arcaya, L.A. y Subramanian, V.S. (2015). Desigualdades en salud: definiciones, conceptos y teorías. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica 38(4), 261-271.
Anguera, M.T.,Chacón, S. y Blanco, A (2008). Evaluación de programas sociales y sanitarios. Madrid: Síntesis.
Borrell C, Díez E, Morrison J, Camprubí L. (2012). Las desigualdades en salud a nivel urbano y las medidas efectivas para reducirlas. Barcelona: Proyectos Medea e IneqCities.
Bizquerra, R. (coord.) (2012).Cómo educar las emociones? La inteligencia emocional en la infancia y adolescencia. Cuadernos Faro, Observatorio de la salud de la infancia y adolescencia. Hospital de Sant Joan de Deu.
Echeburúa, E., labrador, F.J. y Becoña, E. (2009). Adicción a las nuevas tecnologías en adolescentes y jóvenes. Madrid: Pirámide.
Forshaw, M. & Sheffield D. (2013). Health Psychology in Action. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Marks, D.F., Murray, M., Evans, B. y Vida Estacio, E. (2018) Health Psychology. Theory, Research and Practice. London: Sage. (5ª edition).
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2009). Ten things that motivational interviewing is not. Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy, 37(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465809005128
Morgado, I.(2010). Emociones e inteligencia social. Barcelona: Ariel.
Monográfico (2018). The Journal of Positive Psychology. Dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice.
Simón, V. (2015). Mindfulness: una perspectiva psicobiológica An. R. Acad. Med. Comunitat Valenciana, 16. Disponible on-line. https://www.uv.es/ramcv/2015/6_01_052_Vicente_Simon_txt.pdf
Vazquez,C. y Hervás, G. (Coords.) (2009). La ciencia del bienestar. Fundamentos de psicología positiva. Madrid: Alianza Editorial
It's not necessary.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(SEM) Seminars | 111 | Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 112 | Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 1 | Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |