Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2500786 Law | FB | 1 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
The subject History of Law and Institutions does not require prior specific knowledge or requirements.
The teaching of the subject will be taught taking into account the perspective of the Sustainable Development Goals
Group 01
Theory: Stefania Giombini/ Marc Hernández Vallés (Spanish)
Seminar 11. Laura Casas Díaz(Catalan)
Seminar 12. Marc Hernández Vallés(Catalan)
Seminar 13. Stefania Giombini (Spanish)
Group 02
Theory: Josep Cañabate Pérez (Catalan)
Seminar 21. Laura Casas Díaz(Catalan)
Seminar 22. Marc Hernández Vallés(Catalan)
Seminar 23. Josep Cañabate Pérez (Catalan)
Group 03
Teoria: Stefania Giombini/ Marc Hernández Vallés(Spanish/Catalan)
Seminar 31. Josep Cañabate Pérez (Catalan)
Seminar 32. Stefania Giombini (Spanish)
Seminar 33. Marc Hernández Vallés(Catalan)
Group 51
Theory: Àlex Bas Vilafranca.(Catalan)
Seminar 511. Albert Estrada-Rius.(Catalan)
Seminar 512. José Antonio González Clapham/Àlex Bas Vilafranca.(Spanish/Catalan)
Group 70. ADE+Dret.
Teoria: Daniel Vallès Muñió.(Catalan)
Seminar 701. Elisabet Velo Fabregat(Catalan)
Seminar. 702. Mireia Grañén Galera.(Catalan)
Seminar 703. Daniel Vallès Muñió. (Catalan)
NOTE: (1) The theoretical classes of group 1 will be in Spanish and Catalan. In the event that students from abroad or from territories in which Catalan is not the official language enroll in the subject History of Law and Institutions, the theoretical classes of group 01 will be in Spanish.Students who do not understand Catalan from any group must join the aforementioned Group 1.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lectures | 22 | 0.88 | 2, 3, 1, 8, 9, 12 |
Seminars (Oral and writing presentations, etc.) | 22 | 0.88 | 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 13 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Reading texts and preparation | 35 | 1.4 | 2, 3, 1, 8, 9, 12 |
Research and preparation of activities | 30 | 1.2 | 4, 5, 6, 1, 10, 11 |
Study | 36 | 1.44 | 2, 3, 6, 8, 10, 9 |
The development of the teaching of the course and the training of the students correspond to the New Teaching Model approved by the Faculty Board of June 27, 2019.
The course consists of 15 weeks. In the first two weeks of teaching, 3 hours will be devoted to theory. The last week of the semester will only consist of 2 hours of seminar.
(I) Directed (44 hours): those that take place in the lectures (22 hs) and in the seminars (22 hours).
The classes are divided into two types: a) lectures and b) seminars. For this reason, each group of the course is divided by the academic management of the Faculty of Law in these two types. It is very important that the student verify in which master class and seminar group he is enrolled.
a) Lectures: the teachers will make an analytical explanation of each one of the study topics. Through the master class, the aim is to transmit the basic knowledge of the Program, stimulate interest in historical analysis, and answer the students' doubts collectively.
b) Seminars: students analyze and solve historical-legal texts together with teachers. In general, the comments will be made in class, although their preparation can be done in writing before class. The basis of the practical work is the understanding and critical application of the historical regulations related to the essential content explained in the theoretical classes. The objective of the seminar is to promote the acquisition of the different transversal competences by the students. In class different aspects of the Program will beworked from an empirical point of view, through the use of legal texts, which each student will have previously worked with the indicated readingsor materials. Reading comprehension, critical information research, writing, individual and team work, as well as oral skills will be worked on and improved.
(II) Autonomous: external work of students (106 hours).
Individual work of the students based on readings and the search for information.
The directed work is complemented by individual and group work. The objective of this activity is to promote independence of the student in the learning process and provide analytical tools that encourage yourcritical capacity
Tutorials The learning process will be supervised by the teachers through tutorials. the teachers will be at your disposal in the hours previously established for it, to answer questions and follow the general evolution of the course.
Virtual Campus or Moodle Classroom of the subject
In classroom teaching, the Virtual Campus is a useful tool that allows students to have access to a complementary space through which they can access different teaching materials that the teacher considers important to deepen the contents of the subject.
The set of activities will be specified in each group in the classroom moodle, activated the first week of the course. In this space, the schedule of both evaluable and non-assessable activities will be specified in a precise manner. The fixed dates are irremovable, without prejudice to the fact that exceptionally and for reasons of force majeure can be modified, with sufficient notice.
(III) Evaluation: 5 hours.
Surveys of evaluation of the teaching performance and of evaluation of the subject
Professor will have to allocate approximately 15minutes of class time to allow his students to answer the surveys of evaluation of the teaching performance andof evaluation of the subject.
At the beginning of the course, a schedule will be published on the virtual campus.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Active participaticion at classroom and forum/attendance | 10% | 1 | 0.04 | 3, 4, 5, 6, 1, 7, 8, 10, 9, 13, 12 |
Exams | 50% | 2 | 0.08 | 2, 3, 5, 6, 1, 7, 10, 9, 11, 12 |
Individual work (readings, essays, text comments, etc.), group work (debates, works, etc.) | 40% | 2 | 0.08 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1, 7, 8, 10, 9, 11, 13, 12 |
Assessment activities can be carried out throughout the course, partly individually and partly in groups. The evaluation is continuous and is organized according to the training activities previously described. The continuous assessment system combines attendance at theoretical / master classes, active participation in seminars, carrying out evaluable activities (with an overall weight of 50%) and passing the final test (with an overall weight of fifty%). Given that the final test involves the evaluation of the knowledge acquired cumulatively through continuous evaluation activities, it is an essential requirement to pass the final test with a 5/10. evaluation 1. Evaluation model The evaluation model is continuous and has the training objective that students and teachers can know the degree of achievement of the competences to guide their training process. Value of each evaluation item: individual works (20%); group work (20%); final test (50%); attendance and active participation (10%).
The evaluation activities can be done throughout the course in part individually and in part, in groups. The evaluation is continuous and is organized according to the training activities described above.
The continuous assessment system combines the attendance to the theoretical classes, the participation in the practical classes, the realization of the evaluable activities (with a global weight of 50%) and the passing of the final exam (with a global weight of 50%) . It is an essential requirement to pass the final test with a 5 so that it becomes average with the rest of evaluable activities.
2. Conditions to be evaluated
Students will be assessable as long as they have completed a set of activities whose weight is equivalent to a minimum of 2/3 of the total grade for the subject. If the value of the activities carried out does not reach this threshold, the subject teacher may consider the student as non-evaluable
3. Requirements to pass thesubject and recoveries
You must have a minimum grade of 5 in the four items that make up the evaluation. If a student does not pass the evaluation part corresponding to the individual work, the group work or the final pass will have the possibility of making up the established day to re-evaluate. Individual work and group work are retrieved through one or more theoretical questions about the content and subjects worked on in the respective activities.
To pass the subject for re-evaluation, you must also have a 5 on all items. If this minimum score is not obtained for each item, even if the arithmetic mean of the four evaluation items exceeds 5, the final grade in the report will be suspended 4.5.
Given that this is a second chance, the maximum grade for tests and recovered work is 5.
4. Late presentations
They are not accepted, saving situations of force majeure. The student will obtain a 0 in the undelivered practice.
5. Excuses
Excuses for complying with obligations due to illness or force majeure reasons may be accepted as long as there is an official certificate. Absences for academic reasons must be previously accepted by the teaching staff.
6. Fraudulent conduct
A student who copies or tries to copyon an exam will have a 0 on this test. A student who presents a practice in which there is evidence of plagiarism or who cannot justify the arguments of their practice will receive a 0 and receive a warning.
7. Distinctions (Matrícula d'Honor)
Students who obtain a grade of 9 or higher on the final grade may obtain a distinction grade (Matrícula d'Honor). An evaluation committee will be formed among all the professors of the group, which will evaluate with objective criteria if any student meets the requirements of excellence required to obtain this qualification. In any case, by academic regulations, only a maximum of 5% of honorary enrollments can be awarded out of the total number of students enrolled in a course. The evaluation committee with objective criteria may decide not to award any distinction.
8. Single assesment
Those students who take advantage of the single assessment system, after approval by the faculty, will take the following final tests.
1. Final multiple choice exam with a value of 50%.
2. Completion of a course work on the subjects that will be proposed at the beginning of the course with a value of 30%.
3. Oral presentation (lecture) before the teacher of a topic on the subjects that will be proposed at the beginning of the course with a value of 20%.
Compulsory references
Tamar HERZOG, Una breve historia del derecho europeo. Los últimos 2500 años. Alianza Editorial, 2019.
Marta LORENTE, Jesús VALLEJO (coords.), Manual de Historia del Derecho, València, Tirant lo Blanch, 2012.
(Available in https://cataleg.uab.cat/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2040831__Smanual%20de%20historia%20del%20derecho__Orightresult__U__X7?lang=cat&suite=def)
Revista Historia Constitucional http://www.historiaconstitucional.com/index.php/historiaconstitucional
Ius Fugit https://iusfugit.com/
Quaderni Fiorentini http://www.centropgm.unifi.it/quaderni/indici.htm
Cuadernos de Historia del Derecho https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CUHD
Revista de Dret Històric Català https://raco.cat/index.php/RevistaDretHistoric
Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rjlp20/current
Revista de Historia de Estudios Histórico-jurídicos http://www.rehj.cl/index.php/rehj
This subject doesn't use any software.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TE) Theory | 1 | Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 2 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 3 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 51 | Catalan | second semester | afternoon |
(TE) Theory | 70 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |