Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
Evidence of Challenge-Based Learning (CBL) in groups and oral presentations (3)	40%	0	0	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21
Tests (2)	60%	0	0	1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 21

Evaluation activities

It will be necessary to demonstrate that the competences and knowledge of the subject have been achieved. In all the subjects there will be some obligatory readings, small exercises and/or control questions that will be considered the participation to class that represents a 10% of the grade.

The student will have to demonstrate in the deliveries and small group presentations of the evidence of Challenge Based Learning (RBL) (3) their progress and solutions to the problem posed by an agent of the territory, which represent 40% of the final grade. This evaluation is not recoverable.

The individual tests (2) will have a weight of 50% and will be in January and May. The tests may be made up in a final evaluation in June which is equivalent to the re-evaluation.

Both the ABR evidences and the tests will have to be passed independently with a 5 out of 10. If this is not the case, the final grade will be the average of the failed grades. Each activity will have evaluation criteria that will be previously specified.

If it is considered that the student has not been able to provide sufficient evidence of assessment, the subject will be recorded in the transcript as non-assessable.

This course does not include a single evaluation.

 

Criteria for evaluation

To pass this course, students must show a good general communicative competence, both orally and in writing, and a good command of the vehicular language included in the teaching guide. Therefore, linguistic correctness, writing and formal aspects of presentation will be considered in all activities. Students must be able to express themselves fluently and correctly and must show a high degree of understanding of academic texts. An activity may be returned (not evaluated) or failed if the teacher considers that it does not meet these requirements.

To pass the course, students must show an attitude compatible with the teaching profession and an ethical commitment to the deontological principles of the profession, i.e., an attitude of respect, including punctuality, empathy or respect for diversity, plurality of ideas, people and situations. Therefore, xenophobic, sexist, homophobic or discriminatory attitudes in general will not be accepted.

Attendance at 80% of classes, both theory and seminars, is mandatory.

In case of plagiarism, the activity will be suspended.

• A paper, activity or exam will be considered "copied" when it reproduces all or part of a classmate's work.
• A work or activity will also be considered "plagiarized" when a part of an author's text is presented as one's own without citing the sources, regardless of whether the original sources are in paper or digital format (more information on plagiarism at http://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_01.html).
• Copying or plagiarism, in any type of evaluation activity, constitutes an offense and will be penalized with a 0 as a grade for the course, losing the possibility of recovering it, whether it is an individual or group work (in this case, all members of the group will have a 0).
• If during the completion of an individual work in class, the teacher considers that a student is trying to copy or is discovered some kind of document or device not authorized by the teacher, it will be graded with a 0, without the option of recovery, and therefore, the student will fail the course.

For clarification of doubts consult the document "Criteria and general guidelines for evaluation of the Faculty of Educational Sciences" approved by the COA on May 28, 2015 https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/grau/informacio-academica/avaluacio/en-que-consisteix-l-avaluacio-1345662177201.html

Evaluation Activity	Description	% of note	Results Learning
Evidence of Challenge-Based Learning (CBL) in teams Link/Compromises: definition of the sub-challenge (advance on digital whiteboard and oral presentation to the territory agent) = 10 %. Research/Prototyping: proposal of solution of the sub-challenge (advance in digital blackboard and oral presentation to the agent of the territory) = 15 %. Implementation/Evaluation: final solution (digital whiteboard preview and oral presentation to the territory agent) = 15 %.	Starting from a real challenge posed by an entity/institution with which we will have a relationship, we will be required to work in teams to propose possible solutions, which are planned and developed in three phases: Linking/Compromise, Research/Prototyping and Implementation/Evaluation. Each of the groups will focus on a thematic aspect. The results will be presented to local decision-makers and other stakeholders. This evaluation is not retrievable.	40 %	EI.19 EI.10 EI.5 EI.18
Individual tests Individual partial test 25 Individual partial test 25	Written tests on the basic contents taught in class and on the required readings. If any of these tests is failed or not presented, it will be possible to recover to the re-evaluation that will take place in June.	50 %	G3.1 EI.15 EI.12 EI.8 EI.9 EI.17
Individual participation	In all subjects there will be some compulsory readings, small exercises and/or control questions that will be considered as class participation.	10 %	G3.1 FBI01.01 FBI01.02 T07

The deadlines for the completion/submission of the continuous evaluation activities must be scrupulously respected. The results of each of the evaluations will be published on the campus no later than 15 days after their completion. Once the grades of each of the activities of the continuous assessment have been released, an overall assessment will be provided to serve as guidance and as a return of the work done. Based on this information, students will be able to carry out a self-evaluation exercise comparing their activity with the evaluation criteria previously provided.  This self-evaluation exercise facilitates the competence on the learning process itself. In addition, if necessary, the revision of the grade can be done in the hours that the teachers have for tutorials.

Those who have obtained an excellent evaluation in all the evaluations and who have actively and systematically participated in the teaching activities will be eligible for a Matrícula de Honor (MH). If there are more people in the conditions than MH available (5% of the total number of people enrolled in the course), the professor will decide to whom to award this grade based on the quality of their contributions during the course.