Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2502501 Prevention and Integral Safety and Security | OB | 1 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
This subject doesn´t have año pre-requierments.
Differentiate and define security systems, such as electronic, physical and human elements, in latter with special attention to learning men and women with respect and ecuality without prejudice to gender, installed and deployed in facility to protect people and property before that can affect them.
Knowing the regulatory framework, que regula las tecnologías de seguridad, y sus relaciones con los sectores de seguridad pública y privada.
Know the different electronic security devices that are marketed, installed, and maintained for the design of comprehensive security plans.
Na jiné straně, know existují zdravotnické systémy systémů a jak jsou kombinovány s elektronickými systémy zabezpečení k minimizaci různých rizik k tomu, aby instalace byly upevněny, aby mohly být vystaveny.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
40 h Theoretical and practical classes + 4 Evaluation | 44 | 1.76 | |
Type: Supervised | |||
Work planning Readings, reflection on the subjects. Preparation of individual works. PEC, and final test. | 12 | 0.48 | |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Individual and group work (search for material, discussion, preparation and presentation). | 94 | 3.76 |
Teaching language: Spanish
Theoretical classes.
• Practical classes and resolution of practical cases.
• Reading and seminars:
• Debates and discussion forums.
• Oral presentation of work in the classroom.
• Completion of works / projects / reports.
• Study for the exam. Final test (one first part type test, and the second one case to be developed).
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Examination of the topic | 20% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 |
Final exam | 30% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 |
PEC | 50% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24 |
It will start from the criteria based on continuous evaluation, which makes attendance mandatory and will allow us to measure the degree of specific skills of the program that the student has achieved.
The values of each item for the evaluation appear in the following table, all the items must be passed with a minimum grade of 3.5 so that they can be computed in the evaluation.
Midterm exam. Total value: 20%.
The exams may be at the discretion of the teacher in the following way: Oral or written. The writings can be: test type, short questions or long questions to develop or a combination of all the types previously described. The exam grade must be at least 3.5 to be able to add to the continuous evaluation.
PEC. 5 continuous assessment tests. With a value each of 10%. Total value: 50%. The note of the PEC must exceed 3.5 of note so that it can add in the continuous evaluation. In the PEC that detects plagiarism, similarity or has not been well cited, your grade will be 0. PECs submitted after the deadline will be counted as "0".
Final exam. Total value: 30%
In order for the continuous assessment to be completed, the student will have to appear in all the assessable tests (PECs, Midterm Exam, Final Exam). And the grade for the exams and PECs must be at least 3.5 to be included in the continuous assessment.
The exams may be at the discretion of the teacher in the following way: Oral or written. The writings can be: test type, short questions or long questions to develop or a combination of all the types previously described. The exam grade must be at least 3.5 to be able to add to the continuous evaluation.
The PEC and the Papers must be cited in accordance with the corresponding regulations. No work will be accepted without a proper citation. https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/recdoc/2016/145881/citrefapa_a2016.pdf
In case of not passing the subject in ACCORDANCE with the aforementioned criteria (Continuous Assessment), a MAKE-UP TEST may be taken on the date scheduled in the schedule, and which will deal with a summary of all the contents of the program.
To participate in the recovery of the students must have been previously evaluated in a set of activities, the weight of which is equivalent to a minimumof two thirds of the total grade for the subject. However, thegrade that will appear in the student's file is a maximum of 5-approved.
Students who need to change an evaluation date must submit the request by filling out the document that they will find in the EPSI Tutoring moodle space.
Without prejudice to other disciplinary measures that are deemed appropriate, and in ACCORDANCE with current academic regulations, "in the event that the student performs any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade of an evaluation act, they will be graded with a 0 this act of evaluation, regardless of the disciplinary process that may be instructed.In the event that several irregularities occur in the acts of evaluation in the same subject, the final grade for this subject will be "0".
Tests / exams may be written and / or oral at the discretion of the faculty.
Plagio:
If during the correction there are indications that an activity or work has been carried out with answers assisted by artificial intelligence, the teacher may complement the activity with a personal interview to corroborate the authorship of the text.
Single Assessment
Students who opt for the single assessment will take a final synthesis test of all the content of the subject (50%) and will deliver the subject work (50%)
The date for this test and the delivery of the course work will be the same scheduled in the schedule for the last continuous assessment exam.
The same recovery system will be applied as for the continuous evaluation.
Recovery exam
The student who does not pass the subject, who does not reach 5 (total) out of 10,in accordance withthe criteria established in the two previous sections, may take a final exam provided that the student has been evaluated in a set of activities, the weight of which is equivalent to a minimum of two thirds of the total grade for the subject. If you have not been evaluated by these two third parties because you have not taken the tests, you will get a score of Not Taken, without having the possibility of taking the final recovery exam.
In this exam, the set of contents of the subject will be evaluated again.
In the case of passing the final exam, the subject will be approved with a maximum of 5, regardless of the grade obtained in the exam.
Changing the date of a test or exam
Students who need to change an assessment date must submit the request by filling in the document found in the Moodle space for EPSI Tutoring.
Once the document has been completed, it must be sent to the teaching staff of the subject and to the coordination of the Degree.
Revision
To review the evaluation activity, the student must send an email to the teacher, who will indicate the review mechanism.
For single assessment students, the review process will be the same.
If there are unforeseen circumstances that prevent the normal development of the subject, the teaching staff may modify boththe methodology and the evaluation of the subject.
Aguado, V. (2007). Derecho de la Seguridad Pública y Privada . Navarra: Editorial Aranzadi.
Arzoz, X. (2010) Videovigilancia, seguridad ciudadana y derechos fundamentales . Navarra: Editorial Thomson Reuters.
Bentham, J. (1989). El Panóptico . Madrid: Editorial Endymion.
BUBL, M. (2017) La ciencia secreta de la cerrajería . Austria: BUBL.
Calero, LM (2005). La seguridad privada en España: actores, especificaciones y sume Planificación . Madrid: Editorial Universitas Internacional. SL
Desdentado, A., Muñoz, B. (2012). Control informático, videovigilancia y protección de datos en el trabajo . Valladolid: Editorial Lex Nova.
Díaz, F. (2013). Diccionario LID. Inteligencia y Seguridad . Madrid: Editorial Empresarial.
Hierro, JM (2015). Manual operativo del director y jefe de seguridad. Madrid: Editorial Auto-Editor.
Foucault, M. (2012). Vigilar y Castigar . Madrid: Editorial Biblioteca Nueva,SL
Freedman, L. (2019). La Guerra del Futuro . Barcelona: Editorial Crítica.
Gómez, R. (2014). Diccionario terminológico para la seguridad privada . Madrid: Editorial Tecnos.
Gómez, R. (2014). Diccionario terminológico de la seguridad privada . Madrid: Editorial Tecnos. SL
González, J. (2012) Inteligencia . Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch
González, M. (2011). Guía visual para falsear Cerraduras (3.ed.). Illinois: Standard Publicaciones, Inc.
Innerarity, D., Solana, J. (2011). La humanidad amenazada: gobernar los Riesgos globales . Barcelona: Editorial Paidós.
Lamas, L. (2019) Apertura de puertas, técnicas y trucos. (4.ed.). Madrid: Nivel Medio.
Lyon, D. (1995). El ojo electrónico. El auge de la sociedad de vigilancia . Madrid: Editorial Alianza.
Macías Fernández. D. (2014). David contra Goliat. Guerra y Asimetría en la edad contemporánea . Madrid. Editorial Instituto Universitario Gutiérrez Mellado.
Martínez, R. (2002). Armas: ¿Libertad americana o Prevención europea? Barcelona: Editorial Ariel.
Martínez, R., Rodríguez, J. (2018). Inteligencia artificial y armas letales Autónomas . Gijón: Ediciones Trea.
Martínez. E. (2008). Los soldados del Rey . Madrid. Editorial Andújar.
McLaughlin, E., Muncie, J. (2014). Diccionario de criminología . Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa, SA
Miró, F. (2012). El Cibercrimen. Fenomenología y criminología de la delincuencia en el ciberespacio . Barcelona: Editorial Marcial Pons.
Montoya, R. (2014 ). Drones. La muerte por control remoto . Madrid: Editorial Akal.
Muñoz Bolaños. R. (2001). La campaña de 1909. Las campanas de Marruecos, 1909-1927. Madrid.
Perales, T. (2014). Instalaciones de sonido, imagen y seguridad electrónica . Madrid: Editorial Marcombo.
Poveda, MA, Torres, B. (2015). Dirección y gestión de la seguridad privada . Madrid: Editorial Fragua.
Puell de la Villa. F. (2007). La guerra con armas de fuego . M. Artola (ed.). Historia de Europa . Madrid. Editorial Espasa Calpe. Vol. II.
Quedada. F. (2007). La Guerra con arma blanca . M. Artola (ed.) Historia de Europa . Madrid. Editorial. Espasa Calpe. Vol. I.
Ridaura, M.ª J. (2015). Seguridad Privada y Derechos Fundamentales (La nueva Ley 5/2014, de abril, de Seguridad Privada) . Valencia: Editorial Tirant lo Blanch.
Rodríguez, A (2005). 250 modelos de cerrajería . Barcelona: Ediciones CEAC.
Rodríguez, F. (2018). Circuito cerrado de televisión y seguridad electrónica . (ed.2) Madrid. Editorial Paraninfos.
Somoza, O. (2004). La muerte violenta. Inspección oculary cuerpo del delito . Madrid: Editorial la Ley.
Teijeiro de la Rosa. JM. (2016). Dinero y ejercitos en España. De la Antigüedad al siglo XXI . Madrid.
Torrente, D. (2015). Análisis de la seguridad privada . Barcelona: Editorial UOC.
This subject will use the basic software of the office 365 package.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TE) Theory | 1 | Spanish | second semester | afternoon |
(TE) Theory | 2 | Spanish | second semester | afternoon |