Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
Verification of group assignments	50%	2	0.08	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
Written exam of Part 1	25%	2	0.08	2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15
Written exam of Part 2	25%	2	0.08	2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15

This course does not allow the unique evaluation system. The evaluation is continuous. The student sees his progress in the subject at all times.

There will be a delivery for each subject which may contain written exercises and programs. The tasks will be solved in groups and the groupings will be different for each task. In addition to the group grade that will be given by the teaching team, the students will be co-assessed and the individual grade will be given by the grade of the task multiplied by the normalized factor of the co-assessment and possibly an individual validation that can be a test or oral interview.

In total, the grades of the assignments contribute 50% of the final grade.

There will be two written exams during the course and each will have a weight of 25%.

There are no minimum grades in any of the assessments except the final grade. The grade to pass the subject is 5.0.

Recovery process: Both exams can be recovered. The student can present himself for recovery as long as he has presented himself to a set of activities that represent a minimum of two-thirds of the total grade of the subject. Of these, those students who have an average of all the activities of the subject with a grade higher than 3.5 may apply for recovery.

Criteria for Honors Matriculation: Awarding an honors matriculation qualification is the decision of the teaching staff responsible for the subject. UAB regulations indicate that MH can only be granted to students who have obtained a final grade equal to or higher than 9.00. Up to 5% of MH of the total number of enrolled students can be awarded.

Criteria for the Non-Evaluable grade: A student will be considered non-evaluable (NA) only if he/she has not appeared in the written test activities.

Scheduling of assessment activities: The dates of continuous assessment and assignmentof assignments will be published on the subject's website and on the Virtual Campus and may be subject to schedule changes for reasons of adaptation to possible incidents; information will always be provided on the subject's website and the Virtual Campus about these changes, as it is understood that the subject's website and the Virtual Campus are the usual mechanisms for exchanging information between professors and students.

Review procedure: For each assessment activity, a review place, date and time will be indicated in which the student can review the activity with the teacher. In this context, claims can be made about the grade of the activity, which will be evaluated by the teaching staff responsible for the subject. If the student does not appear for this review, this activity will not be reviewed later.

Use of AI tools (eg GPT chat): The use of such tools will be restricted to exams only. This means that it is imperative that you make critical use of these tools, that is, that you use them to learn, not to copy.

Note on plagiarism: Without prejudice to other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, irregularities committed by a student that may lead to a change in the grade in an evaluable activity will be graded with a zero (0). Assessment activities qualified in this way and by this procedure will not be recoverable. If it is necessary to pass any of these assessment activities to pass the subject, this subject will be suspended directly, with no opportunity to recover it in the same course. These irregularities include, among others:

• the total or partial copy of a practice, report, or any other assessment activity;
• letting copy;
• presenting a group work not done entirely by the members of the group (applied to all members, not only those who have not worked);
• presenting as own materials prepared by a third party, even if they are translations or adaptations, and in general works with non-original and exclusive elements of the student;
• having communication devices (such as mobile phones, smart watches, pens with cameras, etc.) accessible during individual theoretical-practical assessment tests (exams);
• talking with colleagues during individual theoretical-practical assessment tests (exams);
• copying or attempting to copy from other students during theoretical-practical assessment tests (exams);
• using or trying to use writings related to the subject during the theoretical-practical assessment tests (exams), when these have not been explicitly allowed.

The numerical grade of the file will be the lower value between 3.0 and the weighted average of the grades in the event that the student has committed irregularities in an evaluation act (and therefore the approved by compensation will not be possible).
In short: copying, allowing copying or plagiarism in any of the assessment activities is equivalent to a SUSPENSION with a grade below 3.0.