Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2500260 Social Education | OB | 3 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
It's recommended to review the subject Anthropology and Philosophy of Education (2nd course).
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Classroom activity in Large group | 30 | 1.2 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18 |
Classroom activity in Seminars | 15 | 0.6 | 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Supervised activity | 30 | 1.2 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Autonomous activity | 75 | 3 | 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 |
All the tasks of the subject follow 3 parts: autonomous activity, directed activity (Large group and Seminars) and supervised activity. All these parts, knowing of the changes that may be appropriate, want to make the gender perspective explicit. In addition, 15 minutes of a session will have to be allocated to answer the evaluation surveys.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Continuous assessment based on evidence in practical tasks (1st part: individual and/or group) | 30% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 |
Continuous assessment based on evidence in practical tasks (2nd part: individual and/or group) | 20% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 |
Individual exercise | 50% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 |
This evaluation will be conducted, during the semester, through the evaluative activities contained in this table.
To pass the subject, you must have a minimum arithmetic mean of 5. A score that comes from the calculation between the three sections. However, this calculation previously requires a minimum grade of 4 in the individual exercise (written exam). In case of failing the subject, there is the possibility of recovering it, with the condition that a minimum arithmetic mean of 3.5 and have delivered 66% of total activities, through a new individual exercise. If successful, the maximum mark of this recovery can only be an approved (from 5 to 6,9). Finally, repeating the subject implies accepting a single final synthesis evaluation.
Next, in a provisional way, the evalutation dates are mentioned: individual exercise (19/06/2025) and retake (03/07/2025).
SINGLE ASSESSMENT
This evaluation implies that the students concentrate the delivery of all the evidences on the date of the individual exercise, previously mentioned. In fact, the weight and requirement of each evidence is identical to continuous assessment. Refering to the improvement, recovery, revision and repetition of the subject, they also follow the same procedure as in the continuous assessment.
For more clarity, again, the indicative evaluation dates are mentioned: individual exercise and deliveries (19/06/2025) and retake (03/07/2025).
RETURN
The marks obtained in each of the activities, in up to 20 business days of the academic calendar, will be delivered to students by publishing the results in the classroom or in the Virtual Campus.
LANGUAGE DOMAINS
In this section, it also takes value: the linguistic correction, the writing and the formal aspects of presentation in all the activities (individual and/or group). In addition, it's necessary to express fluently, correctly and show aptitude in the comprehension of the academic texts. In this sense, an activity can be returned (not evaluated) or suspended, if the teacher considers that it doesn't fulfill these requirements. In turn, you must write the sources, notes, textual citations and bibliographic references correctly in accordance with the APA format.
PROHIBITIONS
Remember that it's not allowed to copy or plagiarize in the writing of any activity (regulation approved by the Comissió d'Ordenació Acadèmica de Graus i Màsters: criteris i pautes generals d'avaluació de la Facultat de Ciències de l'Educació, May 28, 2015; and modified by the Junta de Facultat, April 6, 2017). For more information (http://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_01.html). Therefore, any attempt (URKUND will be used as an anti-plagiarism tool) will mean failing the subject without the option of recovery. An attitudes that are not compatible with the deontological code of the educational profession: active listening, respect, participation, cooperation, empathy, kindness, punctuality, argumentation, correct use of the mobile phone and other technological gadgets, etc.
Arendt, H. (2009). La condició humana. Barcelona: Empúries.
Bauman, Z. (2007). Els reptes de l'educació en la modernitat líquida. Barcelona: Arcàdia.
Bowen, J. (1985). Historia de la educación occidental (3 volúmenes). Barcelona: Herder.
Coll, C. & Albaigés, B. (2021). L´estat de l´educació a Catalunya. Anuari 2020. Barcelona: Fundació Jaume Bofill.
Dalmau, O. (2018). Formación y desarrollo del talento. Una experiencia innovadora en organizaciones de salud. Manresa: Fundació Universitària del Bages.
Drouin-Hans, A.-M. (2008). Relativisme et éducation. Paris: L'Harmattan.
Duch. L. (1997). La educación y la crisis de la modernidad. Barcelona: Paidós.
Escolano, A. (1984). Historia de la educación (2 volúmenes). Madrid: Anaya.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogía del oprimido. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Fullat, O. (1992). Filosofías de la educación. Paideia. Barcelona: Ceac.
Luzuriaga, L. (1980). Historia de la educación y de la pedagogía. Buenos Aires: Losada.
Mèlich, J.-C. (2023). La fragilitat del món. Assaig sobre un temps precari. Barcelona: Tusquets.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2005). El cultivo de la humanidad. Barcelona: Paidós.
Pérez, M. P. (2014). Cómo detectar las necesidades de intervención socioeducativa. Madrid: Narcea.
Reig, D. & Vílchez, L. F. (2013). Los jóvenes en la era de la hiperconectividad: tendencias, claves y miradas. Madrid: Fundación Telefónica & Fundación Encuentro.
Santoni, A. (1981). Historia social de la educación. Barcelona: Reforma de la escuela.
Steiner, G. & Ladjali, C. (2005). Elogio de la transmisión. Maestro y alumno. Madrid: Siruela.
Van Manen, M. (1998). El tacto en la enseñanza. Hacia una pedagogía de la sensibilidad. Barcelona: Paidós.
Interest websites
-Els reptes de l'educació permanent de persones adultes al segle XXI (https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6820705).
-Informe sobre exclusión y desarollo social en España. FOESSA (https://www.foessa.es/main-files/uploads/sites/16/2019/06/Informe-FOESSA-2019_web-completo.pdf).
-Libro blanco del e-learning (https://librosblancos.es/docs/libro_blanco_web.pdf).
This subject doesn't use any type of technological software.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(SEM) Seminars | 311 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 312 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 3 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |