Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2500260 Social Education | OT | 3 |
2500260 Social Education | OT | 4 |
2500261 Education Studies | OT | 4 |
2500797 Early Childhood Education | OT | 4 |
2500798 Primary Education | OT | 4 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
The training objectives to highlight are:
1. Understand the concepts of conflict and mediation. Theoretical approaches based on research and models of professional practice.
2. Understand the mediating process, its techniques and activities for the prevention of conflict.
3. Analyze conflict and mediation in the field of gender, intercultural and social relations from academic research methodologies.
4. Master the normative context about mediation in Catalonia and know the functions of the mediator.
Block I: CONTEXT ELEMENTS
- Conflict: definitions, types, origin, phases, structure, positions, analysis (needs and interests).
- Conflict and violence, types of violence.
- Conflict and social relations.
- Intergroup conflicts. Definition and typologies.
- Transformational approach to conflicts (Galtung, Lederach and Vinyamata).
- Obstacles to overcome conflicts.
- The legal context.
Block II: ANALYSIS AREAS
- Context of sociocultural diversity: the intercultural conflict.
1. Intercultural mediation: concept, principles and context of intervention.
2. Actions of intercultural mediation.
3. Case analysis.
- Gender conflict.
1. Structural causes and local impact.
2. Types of intervention.
- Coexistence at schools:
1. Role of the mediator.
2. Mediation and resolution of conflicts.
3. School mediation programs: examples according to educational stages.
- Conflict to organizations:
1. Analysis elements.
- The conflict from a family perspective:
1. Tools for family mediation.
Block III: PRACTICAL ELEMENTS
- The mediating process: origins, concept, objectives, dimensions, principles, functions and phases.
- Main models of mediation: Harvard, circular - narrative, transformative.
- Basic elements for effective and non-violent communication: assertiveness, trust, healthy communication, cooperation, active listening and creativity.
- Professional competencies and mediation techniques.
- Group processesfor conflict management: cooperation, decision making and negotiation.
- Professional ethics.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Face-to-face activity | 45 | 1.8 | 10, 41, 24, 31, 30, 25, 27, 28, 9, 44 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Supervised activity | 30 | 1.2 | 41, 24, 31, 30 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Autonomous activity | 75 | 3 | 10, 41, 17, 24 |
The teaching-learning process will be developed in the classroom, counting at all times with the contribution and involvement of the student.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
A1 - Team written work with individual qualification (Continuous evaluation modality) | 35% | 0 | 0 | 10, 3, 4, 1, 5, 16, 43, 8, 39, 42, 37, 41, 36, 38, 40, 22, 15, 11, 14, 12, 13, 18, 24, 31, 19, 20, 21, 23, 30, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 32, 33, 35, 34, 7, 45, 9, 44 |
A2 - Oral presentation of the work: defense of the mediation proposal (individual and oral) | 25% | 0 | 0 | 10, 41, 17, 24, 30, 31, 27, 29, 45, 9, 44 |
A3 - Practical evidence of the most relevant contents (individual and written) | 40% | 0 | 0 | 2, 6, 43, 41, 36, 15, 17, 18, 24, 23, 30, 31, 45 |
CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT
Students will be assessed provided they have completed a set of activities that account for a minimum of 2/3 of the total course grade. If the value of the completed activities does not reach this threshold, the course instructor may consider the student as non-assessable.
The evaluation of the subject will be carried out throughout the academic year by passing the programmed activities. The average will be made from a minimum score of 5 in each of the evaluation activities. The subject will be approved with a minimum score of 5. All the evaluation evidence must be presented in order to average between them. Students, who during the course have carried out an adequate follow-up of the subject and still have some part not passed, will have the opportunity to pass it by making a final recovery. The possibility that the reassessment serves to raise the grade is not contemplated.
ACTIVITIES (INDIVIDUAL QUALIFICATIONS)
|
WEIGHT IN THE EVALUATION | MINIMUM MARK TO TAKE AVERAGE |
WRITTEN TEST | 40 | 5 |
ORAL PRESENTATION | 25 | 5 |
WRITTEN WORK | 35 | 5 |
The grades obtained in each of the evaluation activities will be delivered to the student body in a maximum of twenty days by posting the results on the Virtual Campus. Once the grades have been delivered, the students may request the review of the grade in the hours allocated to tutorials during the ten days after receiving the grade.
The oral presentations will be made in a staggered way in different sessions, they will be determined by lottery on the first day of class, and will not begin before the start of the second block.
For the written assignment, the maximum submission deadline will be two days after the classroom defense. Therefore, groups defending on December 10 must submit it no later than December 12, 2024.
The date for the written exam will be December 17, 2024.
The make-up exams or assignments will be conducted or submitted on January 28, 2025.
Copying or plagiarism implies a zero in the entire subject.
SINGLE ASSESSMENT
The evaluation of the subject will be carried out only during a day, through the programmed activities which are specified in the following table. The average will be made from a minimum score of 5 in each of the evaluation activities. The subject will be approved with a minimum score of 5. It is necessary to present all the evaluation evidence to make an average between them. Students who do not pass any part will have the opportunity to do so through a final recovery. The possibility that the reassessment serves to raise the grade is not contemplated, nor is direct assistance to the final recovery. In case of reassessment, the maximum mark that can be obtained will be 6.
INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITIES |
WEIGHT IN THE EVALUATION | MINIMUM MARK TO TAKE AVERAGE |
WRITTEN TEST | 40 | 5 |
ORAL TEST | 45 | 5 |
REVIEW OF ACADEMIC ARTICLES / PRACTICAL ASSUMPTIONS | 15 | 5 |
The date for the three assessment tests will be January 21, 2025. The final recovery for these tests will be on January 28, 2025.
The grades obtained in each of the assessment activities will be delivered to the students as soon as possible so that, if the case arises, they can prepare the reassessment at least 48 hours before it. Once received, you can request its review, which would be carried out in the hours allocated to tutorials prior to the final recovery.
In general, the tutorial spaces will be reserved to give space to doubts, not to the development of the agenda.
Copying or plagiarism implies a zero in the entire subject.
DATA OF INTEREST
The course is essentially professional, focused on student participation in theory and seminars. Consequently, attendance in person is mandatory.
When students do not attend a minimum of 80% of the teaching activities, it will not be possible to evaluate. For an absence to be considered excused, it must be documented. Only those derived from supervening force majeure such as illness or similar situations that prevent them from attending teaching activities can be justified absences. Carrying out another formative activity of the degree may be considered an excused absence if previously accepted by the teaching staff responsible for the subject.
Classes start on time. Entry into class is not allowed once it has started, nor is it allowed to leave early after it has finished.
Attitude in the classroom should be proactive, respectful, and constructive. It is recommended to contribute with ideas, questions, and relevant comments that enrich the debate and collective learning.
Correctuse of language, grammar, and spelling willbe valued in all activities.
Almirall, J. I.; Checa, P. y Grau, A. (2001). La mediación como metodología de resolución de conflictos. Aula de Innovación Educativa, 103-104; pp. 68-71.
Bisquerra, R. (2008). Educación para la ciudadanía y convivencia: el enfoque de la educación emocional. En Wolters Kluwer.
Boqué, M.C. (2003). Cultura de mediación y cambio social. Gedisa.
Boueri, S. y Salazar, M. (2004) Aportaciones teóricas para el abordaje del conflicto y los medios alternativos de resolución con especial énfasis en la mediación. Cenipec, 23, 159-191.
Canimas, J. & Carbonell, F. (2008). Educació i conflictes interculturals. Primum non nocere. EUMO Editorial.
Cascón, F. (2000d). La mediación. Cuadernos de Pedagogía 287; pp. 72-76.
Colectivo AMANI. (2004). La escuela intercultural: regulación de conflictos en contextos multiculturales.
Conforti, F. (2010). Comentando el libro "Transformación de conflictos". Pequeño manual de uso de John Paul Lederach. Versión digital online.
Decret 135/2012, de 23 d'octubre, pel qual s'aprova el Reglament de la Llei 15/2009. (DOGC 6240 25.10.2012).
Domingo, V. (2012). Herramientas para la aplicación de la justicia restaurativa. Cómo introducir otras prácticas restaurativas además de la mediación penla en España. Dialnet, 4.
Fabra, M.Ll. (2008). Jo, ni més, ni menys. Assertivitat per a força dones i alguns homes. Octaedro.
Ferrari Rebull, A., & Panchón Iglesias, C. (2006). La mediació en problemes de convivència familiar. Temps d’Educació, 31, 67-84. http://www.raco.cat/index.php/TempsEducacio/article/view/126446/176901
Galtung, J. (1998). Tras la violencia, 3R: reconstrucción, reconciliación, resolución. Bakeaz.
García Sáiz, M. & Gil Rodríguez, F. (1999). Procesos de influencia social. A Gil Rodríguez & Alcover de la Hera. (Coords.). Introducción a la psicología de los grupos. Pirámide.
Gil Rodríguez, F. (1999). Relaciones intergrupales. A Gil Rodríguez & Alcover de la Hera. (Coords.). Introducción a la psicología de los grupos. Pirámide.
Harvard Business School (2005). Negociaciones ganadoras para conservar las relaciones. Gestión 2000.
Kressel, K. y Pruitt, D. G. (1989). Mediation Research: The Process and Effectiveness of Third-Party Intervention (Jossey-Bass Social & Behavioral Science). Jossey-Bass Wiley.
Lederach, J. P. (1996). El proceso de mediar en conflicto. Aula de Innovación Educativa, 63. pp.79-80.
Llei 15/2009, del 22 de juliol, de mediació en l'àmbit deldret privat. (DOGC 5432 - 30.7.2009).
Martínez, O., Steffens, E. J., Ojeda, D. C., & Hernández, H. G. (2018). Estrategias Pedagógicas Aplicadas a la Educación con Mediación Virtual para la Generación del Conocimiento Global. Formación universitaria, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50062018000500011
Matienzo, R. (2020). Evolución de la teoría del aprendizaje significativo y su aplicación en la educación superior. Dialektika: Revista de Investigación Filosófica y Teoría Social, 2.
Mayer, B. S. (2008). Más allá de la neutralidad. Cómo superar la crisis de la resolución de conflictos. Gedisa.
MEC. (2007). Coeducación y prevención temprana de la violencia de género. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.
Merino Trigueros, M. T. (2021). La mediación escolar: alternativa para la resolución de conflictos. Revista Cognosis. ISSN 2588-0578, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.33936/cognosis.v6i2.2669
Moreira, M. A. (2017). Aprendizaje significativo como un referente para la organización de la enseñanza. Archivos de Ciencias de la Educación, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.24215/23468866e029
Munduate, J. L. y Medina, F. J. (2005). Gestión del conflicto, negociación y mediación. Pirámide.
Munné, M., et. al. (2006) Els 10 principis de la cultura de mediació. Ed.Graó.
Ponti, F. (2008). Los caminos de la negociación. Verticales de Bolsillo.
Pruitt, D. G. y Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. Random House.
Puchol, L. (2009). El libro de la negociación. Díaz de Santos.
Puntes, S. (2003). Los derechos sociales y la mediación: un cambio real. A Casanovas & Poblet. Gestió i resolució de conflictes al segle XXI: ciutadania i violència. Fundació Caixa Sabadell.
Rebollo Revesado, S. (2022). Provención, prevención y solución del conflicto humano desde las prácticas restaurativas. Familia. Revista de Ciencia y Orientación familiar, 60. https://doi.org/10.36576/2660-9525.60.89
Romero, C. (2000). Mediació Escolar. Barcelona. Ediciones ICESB. Colección Quaderns d'Estudi; 2.
Soleto, E. y Otero, M. (2007). Mediación y solución de conflictos. Habilidades para una necesidad emergente. Tecnos.
Soto Carrillo, J. A., & Navia Antezana, C. S. (2022). Taller de reflexión narrativa para desarrollar herramientas ante conflictos y violencias escolares. Journal de Comunicación Social, 15. https://doi.org/10.35319/jcomsoc.2023151269
Torrego, J.C. (Coord). (2000a). Mediación de conflictos en instituciones educativas. Manual para la formación de mediadores. Narcea.
Ury, W. L. (2005). Alcanzarla paz. Resolución de conflictos y mediación en la familia, el trabajo y el mundo. Paidós.
Vinyamata, E. (2001). Conflictología. Curso de resolución de conflictos. Ariel.
Vinyamata, E. (Coord.). (2004). Guerra y paz en el trabajo. Tirant lo Blanch.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TE) Theory | 4 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |