Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2500256 Social and Cultural Anthropology | OB | 2 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
In accordance with the 2009 Plan of Studies, approved by the Ministry, you must take the following subjects in this established order:
Second year, first semester: Field Practices in Social and Cultural Anthropology I; second semester: Epistemology and Research Methodology in Social and Cultural Anthropology; Third year, first semester: Research Techniques in Social and Cultural Anthropology; second semester: Field Practices in Social and Cultural Anthropology II.
The Field Practices in Social and Cultural Anthropology I (hereafter, Field Practices I), is the first step of a five courses itinerary that is developed throughout two years of studies (BA second and third years), and that concludes in the first semester of fourth year with the Bachelor’s Degree Final Project.
The objectives of Field Practices I are:
The objectives of the course will be achieved gradually and until the end there will be no clear awareness of what has been done, to a large extent, thanks to the reflexive work that is required to evaluate the subject. This lack of awareness over what is being done may entail certain insecurity at some point during the course (which is inherent to the participant observation technique, and at the same time necessary in the initiation to the technique that concerns us).
Content (except lectures and initial readings) will not be advanced but will be introduced as the different moments of the process of entering the field will be achieved.
The following aspects will be considered:
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Plenary sessions | 10 | 0.4 | 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 21, 22, 24, 25 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Individual tutorial sessions | 10 | 0.4 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Drafting of the final paper | 20 | 0.8 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 24, 27, 28 |
Participant observation during fieldwork | 35 | 1.4 | 1, 2, 5, 6, 11, 15, 16, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26 |
Reading and reviews of required articles | 15 | 0.6 | 8, 13, 14, 18, 27 |
Registry, systematization and analysis of the fieldwork diary | 60 | 2.4 | 2, 6, 21 |
In the time frame assigned to this subject, there’ll be about seven group sessions throughout the semester, addressed to the whole group, of approximately one hour and a half-length, in accordance with a calendar which is established at the beginning of the course. In these plenary sessions, apart from contents, common work guidelines will be given, depending on the moment of the process of the practice in which we are. The first collective session is held the first week of class.
The rest of the workload will be individually supervised according to a schedule agreed between the student and the lecturer (specific day and hour). This individual monitoring will dive into those issues which have been reported collectively in the plenary sessions, in order to adequate them to the specific context of the practice of each student. These tutorials will help the students to know the required abilities and specific difficulties in the ethnological relationship, as well as the characteristics of his/her perception. Also they will be of great importance to raise awareness of concrete and specific issues related to the type of situations and population which the student is working with and will provide the context where all those doubts, insecurities, problems and other questions related to the course of the practice can be clarified.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1a. Reading and corresponding reviews | 10% | 10 | 0.4 | 8, 13, 14, 18, 27 |
1b. Assistance and participation in collective sessions | 10% | 10 | 0.4 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 21, 22, 24, 25 |
2. The process of work and follow-up of tutorials | 40% | 90 | 3.6 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 13, 15, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 |
3. The analysis process and the final work | 40% | 40 | 1.6 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 24, 27, 28 |
This subject is evaluated throughout the semester with the permanent supervision of the course lecturers. It consists of three parts:
The enrolled students must complete all the field tasks planned for the development of the subject in order to be entitled to present the final work and to be evaluated. Therefore, the students who do not properly attend the schedules tutorials and satisfactorily complete the tutorial process will be considered as NOT EVALUABLE.
In order, to be evaluable in this course it is necessary to have passed 2/3 of the subject through the tutoring of the follow-up of the work and the process of analysis.
Please, notice that the process of evaluation does not contemplate a re-evaluation system, given the eminently practical character of the course (as specified in article 112.1 Doc. Adaptation of the evaluation regulations, UAB).
Throughout the course, the lecturing staff will inform the students of the date and procedure of the grade reviewing.
In the event that tests or exams cannot be taken onsite, they will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB’s virtual tools (original weighting will be maintained). Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or discussion on Teams, etc. Lecturers will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools, or will offer them feasible alternatives.
In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.
This subject/module does not incorporate single assessment.
Required reading dossier
San Román, Teresa (2000). “El mundo que compartimos. Una alternativa”. Revista Antropología, 9.
Taylor, S.J. & R. Bogdan (1986). "La observación participante en el campo" a Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. Barcelona: Paidos, pp. 50-91.
Cardoso de Oliveira, Roberto (2004). “El trabajo del antropólogo: mirar, escuchar, escribir”, AVÁ, 5, pp. 55-68.
Malinowski, Bronislaw (1975 [1939]). “Confesiones de ignorancia y fracaso” a J.R. Llobera (ed) La antropología como ciencia. Barcelona: Anagrama, pp.129-139.
Pérez, C., E. Ardèvol, M. Bertrán & B. Callén (2003). "Etnografía virtualizada: la observación participante y la entrevista semiestructurada en línea". Athenea Digital: Revista de pensamiento e Investigación Social, 3, 72-92. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-64775
Recommended bibliography
Ardèvol E., Gómez-Cruz. E. (2020). “Digital ethnography and media practices”. A: F. Darling-Wolf (Editor). The International Encyclopedia of Media Studies: Research Methods in Media Studies, Volume 7.
Geertz, C. (1998). “Juego profundo: notas sobre la riña de galles en Bali”. A: La interpretación de las culturas. Barcelona: Gedisa, pp. 339-373.
Guasch, O. (1997). “Observación Participante”. Cuadernos Metodológicos, 20. CIS (Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas), Madrid.
Hammersley, M., Atkinson, P. (1994). Etnografía. Métodos de Investigación. Barcelona: Paidós, 69.
Lawrence Neuman, W. (1997). Social Research Methods. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston, London: Allyn and Bacon.
San Román, T. (1996) “De la intuición a la contrastación: El trabajo de campo en antropología y en la formación de los nuevos antropólogos”. A: A. González Echevarría (coord.), Simposio VIII Epistemología y método, Actas del VII Congreso de Antropología Social. Zaragoza, pp. 167-178.
San Román, T. (2009) “Debates, informes y entrevistas Sobre la investigación etnográfica”. Revista de Antropología Social, 18, pp. 235-260. file:///C:/Users/1003662/Downloads/ecob,+RASO0909110235A.PDF.pdf
For more information on digital ethnography, see: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZCl8/preview
Word processor (Word type).
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TE) Theory | 1 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |