Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2500259 Political Science and Public Management | OT | 3 |
2500259 Political Science and Public Management | OT | 4 |
2503778 International Relations | OB | 2 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Students should have some basic backgrond knowledge in International Relations.
In this class we want to become knowledgeable about theorization in IR: its concepts, tools, history and practical use. We want to do so in a reflexive manner: we also want to understand theorization as socially produced and as reflective of intellectual, cultural and often political projects. We also want to locate that story in the framework of theoretical and methodological debates in social sciences.
This requires:
a) Understanding what theories are and what they are for. We respond to these questions by way of broad definitions that can encompass all that is perceived as theorization in IR, rather than by proposing narrow takes on what theories should be about.
b) Taking the history of theorization and the history in which theorization takes place seriously. You will be reminded of certain historical processes, events and trends that have shaped IR in the last century and a half –and to which theorization in IR has tried to respond/can be traced back to. Some additional reading from your part might be useful, if you feel such references escape you.
c) Becoming familiar with at least a modicum of knowledge about the debate over how we get to know what we know. Debates over epistemology link theorization in IR with broader trends in social sciences.
d) Being able to juggle with diverse, and sometimes contradictory, maps of the discipline that redraw the divide lines between schools of thought, or have different takes on what such divides are about.
Specific objectives
1. Locate theories of International Relations in the broader frameworks of a) history, b) theorization in social sciences, and c) the most basic epistemological debates
2. Understand the concepts of theory (and metatheory), with its nuances and complexities, as well as its use in International Relations.
3. Master the key schools of thought in theory of International Relations. We will do this by way of: a) understanding how they arepresented in their handbook version; b) using other sources not designed to convey information to students, texts that have become key milestones in the development of theorization in IR; c) providing guidance and basic explanations at class; d) studying theories in use in real world cases.
4. Map theories and understand the relationships with each other and with the different versions of each other and of themselves.
Block I. General overview, tools, basic concepts
1. Theory: why. Case study: the birth of International Relations, things seen and unseen.
2. Theory: what. Types, functions, theory change, theory change in social sciences and International Relations. Grand-theories and middle-range theories. Basic concepts.
3. Maps of theorization in IR. Classical maps (traditions, debates) and a more complex proposal.
Block II. Grand-theories of International Relations. Atomistic ontologies
4. Classical realism.
5. Structural realism and neoclassical realism
6. Liberalism. Idealism, functionalism, transnationalism
7. Neoinstitutionalism and bringing back liberalism
Block II. Grand-theories. Social ontologies
8. English School and international society
9. Constructivism. Ontological and epistemological constructivisms.
10. Marxism, structuralism
11. Critical theory. Frankfurt school and neo-Gramscians
12. Feminist IR Theory
Block III. Theories about theories
Part of lessons 11 and 12.
13. Post-structuralism
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lectures | 40 | 1.6 | |
Practical cases and activities | 4 | 0.16 | |
Seminaries | 6 | 0.24 | |
Type: Supervised | |||
Control of readings and papers | 25 | 1 | |
Exam | 7.5 | 0.3 | |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Readings and cases | 67.5 | 2.7 |
The dedication to the class is divided into different types of activities that, in coherence, are materialised in different requirements and methodologies. This is a 6 ECTS subject, therefore 150 hours. These 150 hours are divided into the following activities:
a) Face-to-face or directed (50 hours, 33.3 %)
Lectures and debates: 20 sessions (40 hours).
Seminars in the classroom: 3 sessions (6 hrs)
Evaluated classroom practical sessions: 2 sessions (4 hrs)
b) Supervised activities: reading controls, text commentaries, tutorials for assignments, comments on exams and assignments: 25 hrs (16.7%).
c) Assessment: 7,5 hrs (5%)
d) Autonomous work of the student (study and work at home and/or library): 67,5 hrs (45%)
2. Practical instructions on the virtual campus material and classroom activity:
Each lecture (or group of related lectures) will have a) a specific outline to guide the face-to-face/directed sessions and related activities; b) one or two compulsory readings; and c) some additional readings or references.
The compulsory readings (beyond references to books or web pages) will be available on the virtual campus, grouped in specific tabs related to each lectures or group of related lectures.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Final Exam | 50% | 0 | 0 | 1, 4, 6, 15, 12, 10, 16, 18, 14 |
Participation, small deliverables | 10% | 0 | 0 | 1, 4, 3, 7, 6, 9, 5, 12, 10, 16, 17, 14, 11, 2, 8 |
Two case studies/seminar sessions | 40% | 0 | 0 | 1, 4, 6, 13, 9, 15, 12, 10, 16, 18 |
Written exam (at class):50% of the final mark
Two practical exercises (at class):20+20% of the final mark
Participation, little deliverables (to be prepared at my demand during the lecture), other small exercises:10% of the final mark
Important. Passing the course requires two different marks to be equal or higher than 5/10: (1) that of your exam, and (2) your overall average of marks. Failing the former condition (1), your final mark will be that of the exam.
Re-takes. There will be a retake of the exam, plus a retake of the two practical exercises. Only students with a grade below 5 will be able use those opportunities. In other words: you cannot re-take any of those elements if you have already passed it. Re-takes of the practical exercises will consist of additional questions at the final exam.
Single-day evaluation. If you have signed up for it (and you are not an exchange student) you can opt for a single-day evaluation. This means that at the day of the final exam you will:
-answer the normal final exam
-answer the re-takes of the two practical exercises
-orally answer two questions that same day, at my office, after the “normal” exam ends.
Only two handbooks are proposed here. In Campus Virtual, required and optional readings will be detailed for each group of related lessons.
Dunne, T., M. Kurki & S. Smith (eds.) (2020, 5th edition) Theories of International Relations: Discipline and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jorgensen, Knud Erik (2010), International Relations Theory. A New Introduction, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
none
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 51 | English | second semester | afternoon |
(TE) Theory | 51 | English | second semester | afternoon |