Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2500259 Political Science and Public Management | FB | 1 |
2500262 Sociology | FB | 1 |
2503778 International Relations | FB | 1 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
No prior knowledge of Economics is presupposed.
It should be taken into account, however, that Economics, as a field of knowledge, uses numerical, graphical and algebraic languages, in addition to the verbal language, to identify and represent quantitative relationships and and relationships of dependence and causality between variables.
The objective of the subject is to provide the basic tools developed so far by economic science and that allow us to analyze and understand much of the current social reality, as well as persistent economic organization issues in all human societies. Some of the questions that arise are the following:
Since when, and why, there are markets and money, and what is their function? Why and when do firms grow up, or, on the contrary, close up? Where do the profits of business come from? What is productivity, and why is it important? What are they, and how can emission rights markets help the planet's sustainability? What challenges does Climatic Change involve? How can the degree of inequality be measured within a country? What are the causes of inequality and poverty within a society? What are the implications of gender inequalities? What public interventions improve collective well-being, and which ones do not? What interventions reduce inequality and which ones do not? Why are there so big income differences per capita between the different countries of the world? What are economic cycles? What are the causes and consequences of inflation? Why is there unemployment, and why does the number of unemployed vary over time?
Despite the complexity of the addressed questions, the objective is that the student, at the end of the course, has learned to use the basic tools we currently have to begin dealing with these issues rigorously and autonomously, and know how to search for information about the facts, how to analyze them and how to distinguish between analysis, assessment and opinion. This effort must allow the student's informed participation as a citizen in debates on public policies both locally and globally, as well as facilitating the study of other economic subjects throughout the degree.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Master classes | 90 | 3.6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 34 |
Practice classes | 15 | 0.6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 13, 14, 34 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutorials | 32 | 1.28 | 11, 12, 24, 26 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Problem sets | 60 | 2.4 | 12, 26, 35 |
Reading and studying of textbook and class material | 70 | 2.8 | 21, 29, 35 |
Web information search | 20 | 0.8 | 12, 34 |
Directed activities (classroom): 35% of the ECTS
-Master classes
-Problem-based learning sessions
-Explanation and case discussion sessions (press articles, texts from international organizations such as the United Nations, or audiovisual material).
Supervised activities: 10%
-Tutorials (individual meetings or in small groups with the teaching staff)
-Autonomous activities: 50% of the ECTS
-Reading and study of the texts provided (textbooks, notes, other readings): 30%
-Solution of problems: 20%
Evaluation: 5%
Set of 6 evaluable activities
The proposed teaching methodology may undergo some modifications according to the restrictions imposed by the health authorities on on-campus courses.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Complementary Activity -1st semestrer | 12.5% of the annual grade | 2 | 0.08 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 36 |
Complementary Activity -2nd semester | 12.5% of the annual grade | 2 | 0.08 | 2, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 31, 34 |
Exam -1st semester | 25% of the annual grade | 2.5 | 0.1 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, 21, 24, 25, 26, 31, 34 |
Exam -2nd semester | 25% of the annual grade | 2.5 | 0.1 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, 21, 24, 25, 26, 31, 34 |
SPC -1st semester | 12.5% of the annual grade | 2 | 0.08 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 36 |
SPC -2nd semestrer | 12.5% of annual grade | 2 | 0.08 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 31, 34, 35 |
1. Continuous evaluation
There will be 6 assessment activities conceived as a complement to the necessary regular attendance in class. Of these, 3 correspond to the first semester (which give rise to the overall grade of the semester), and 3 to the second semester. The global qualification of each semester weights 50% in the total grade of the subject.
Activities 1 (SPC first semester), and 4 (SPC second semester) correspond to assessment sessions consisting of solving problems or questions / written discussion about the students' texts in the classroom. Each one will weight 12.5% on the final grade (or, equivalent to 25% on each semester). For these sessions, the group can be split up on the days and times specified by the teaching staff.
Activities 2 and 5 will be complementary activities of class attendance, the exact nature of which will be set by each teacher among the following options: group videos; essays written in group; individual resolution of exercises commissioned by the teacher; Individual comment of a book agreed with the teacher. For each modality, the teacher will publish in advance a rubric explaining the evaluation criteria. Each of these activities will be considered 12.5% in the final grade (or equivalent, 25% of each semester).
Tests 3 and 6 correspond to individual tests or examinations of understanding and ability to apply the set of concepts and topics covered in the first and second semester respectively. Each one will weight 25% in the final grade (or equivalent, 50% of each semester). In order to average with the SPC of the semester, you must obtain a minimum mark of 3.5 in these tests. These tests will take place the day, time and place indicated by the Faculty.
Each teacher will be able to condition the evaluation of SPC activities and complementary activities to attendance and participation in class.
To pass the subject, the weighted average of the two semesters (weighting 50% each) must be equalto or greater than 5 points out of 10 and the grade for each semester must be equal to or greater than 3.5 points out of 10 .
In the event that the indicated average gives a FAILED rating, it will be possible to perform a compensatory assessment session (as long as the average is not lower than 3). Those students who show up in the compensatory test can obtain a maximum of 5 qualification for the semester for which they have done the test. This session will take place in accordance with the calendar set by the Faculty. If a student does the compensatory test of the two semesters, to pass the subject it will be necessary that the weighted average is equal to or greater than 5 and that on the part of each semester it has a grade equal to or greater than 3.5.
Students who initiate the continuous evaluation process will have a final grade approved or suspended from the subject, in any case not presented.
Approximate calendar evaluations
First semester
Test 1: SPC 1 - Last week, October or First week, November (date fixed by the teaching staff).
Trial 2: Complementary activity - to be carried out from September and deliver the first-second week of December (date fixed by the teaching staff).
Test 3: Written test (date, time and classroom set by the Faculty).
Second Semester
Test 4: SPC - Third-Fourth week March (date fixed by the teaching staff).
Trial 5: Complementary activity - to be done from February and hand over the first-second week of April (date fixed by the teaching staff).
Test 6: Written test (date, time and classroom set by the Faculty).
2. Comprehensive evaluation
Individual tests or examinations of understandingand ability to apply the set of concepts and topics covered in the first and second semester respectively. Each one will weight 50% in the final grade.
To pass the subject, the average of the two semesters must be equal to or greater than 5 points out of 10 and the grade for each semester must be equal to or greater than 3.5 points out of 10 .
For the retake procedure, no distinction is made between students who have followed the continuous evaluation and those who have opted for the comprehensive evaluation. All will be re-assessed using the same test or evaluation evidence.
The review of the final qualification will follow the same procedure as for the continuous evaluation.
The proposed evaluation activities may undergo some changes according to the restrictions imposed by the health authorities on on-campus courses.
The following basic bibliography includes textbooks and reference books. Each instructor will recommend bibliography and specific references for specific chapters. It is the responsibility of the students to read the materials recommended for each chapter. The two main books that will be used are the following (each instructor will explain in which proportion and which chapters correspond to each part of the Teaching Guide):
P. Krugman, R. Wells i K. Graddy, Fundamentos de Economía, Editorial Reverté, 2013.
CORE Project (https://www.core-econ.org/), free e-book La Economía: https://www.core-econ.org/the-economy/es/
Additional recommended books:
Mankiw, G.N., Principios de economia, Ediciones Paraninfo, 6ª ed., 2012.
Samuelson, P., Nordhaus, W., Economía. Ed. McGraw-Hill, 19ª ed., 2010
Mochón, F., Economía. Teoría y Política. Ed. McGraw-Hill, 6ª ed., 2009.
Robinson, J., Eatwell, J., Introducción a la Economía Moderna, 2ª ed., 1982.
Ostrom, E., El Gobierno de los bienes comunes : la evolución de las instituciones de acción colectiva, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2ª ed., 2011.
Perdices de Blas, L.; Gallego Abaroa, E., Mujeres economistas. Editorial del Economista. Madrid, 2007.
Castells-Quintana, D., La Esquiva Búsqueda de la Prosperidad: Una Breve Historia del Pensamiento Económico, Ediciones UAB, 2021.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 1 | Catalan | annual | morning-mixed |
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 2 | Spanish | annual | morning-mixed |
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 51 | Catalan | annual | afternoon |
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 52 | Catalan | annual | afternoon |
(TE) Theory | 1 | Catalan | annual | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 2 | Spanish | annual | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 51 | Catalan | annual | afternoon |
(TE) Theory | 52 | Catalan | annual | afternoon |