This version of the course guide is provisional until the period for editing the new course guides ends.

Logo UAB

Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art Seminar

Code: 100281 ECTS Credits: 6
2024/2025
Degree Type Year
2500246 Philosophy OT 3
2500246 Philosophy OT 4

Contact

Name:
Jessica Patrici Jaques Pi
Email:
jessica.jaques@uab.cat

Teachers

Gerard Vilar Roca
Jessica Patrici Jaques Pi
Andrea Lorena Soto Calderon
Bárbara Bayarri Viñas
Daniela Callejas Aristizabal

Teaching groups languages

You can view this information at the end of this document.


Prerequisites

None


Objectives and Contextualisation

The subject Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art Seminar is subtitled: The Critique of the Faculty of Judgment on the tercentenary of the death of Immanuel Kant. The main objective of this subject is to do philosophy with art based on the systematic and detailed reading of KU and its updating in modern and contemporary art and fundamental texts of current aesthetics.

The specific objectives are:

 1. Knowledge of KU's argument and its impact on Kantian philosophy in general

 2. The processes of updating Kantian aesthetics

 2. The achievement of an initial degree of experience in philosophy applied to the construction of artistic narratives and its incidence in the corresponding debate forums and in professionalization.

 4. The spurring of creativity in the philosophical training of the student

 5. Professionalization in the world of creativity from discursive practice

 6. Preparation for training in advanced studies on philosophy and creativity.


Competences

    Philosophy
  • Analysing and summarising the main arguments of fundamental texts of philosophy in its various disciplines.
  • Identifying the main philosophical attitudes in the field of aesthetics and critically applying them in the art world.
  • Recognising and interpreting topics and problems of philosophy in its various disciplines.
  • Students must be capable of applying their knowledge to their work or vocation in a professional way and they should have building arguments and problem resolution skills within their area of study.
  • Students must be capable of collecting and interpreting relevant data (usually within their area of study) in order to make statements that reflect social, scientific or ethical relevant issues.
  • Students must be capable of communicating information, ideas, problems and solutions to both specialised and non-specialised audiences.
  • Students must develop the necessary learning skills to undertake further training with a high degree of autonomy.
  • Students must have and understand knowledge of an area of study built on the basis of general secondary education, and while it relies on some advanced textbooks it also includes some aspects coming from the forefront of its field of study.
  • Thinking in a critical and independent manner on the basis of the specific topics, debates and problems of philosophy, both historically and conceptually.

Learning Outcomes

  1. Accurately describing an artistic object with the specific language of art criticism.
  2. Applying philosophical rigour in a written text following the international quality standards.
  3. Autonomously searching, selecting and processing information both from structured sources (databases, bibliographies, specialized magazines) and from across the network.
  4. Carrying out a planning for the development of a subject-related work.
  5. Carrying out oral presentations using an appropriate academic vocabulary and style.
  6. Correctly, accurately and clearly communicating the acquired philosophical knowledge in oral and written form.
  7. Demonstrating a personal stance over a problem or controversy of philosophical nature, or a work of philosophical research.
  8. Developing self-learning strategies.
  9. Discriminating the features that define the writer's place in the context of a problem and reorganising them in a consistent diagram.
  10. Distinguishing and analysing classical and current debates of the History of Art.
  11. Distinguishing and outlining the fundamental content of a philosophical text.
  12. Effectively communicating and applying the argumentative and textual processes to formal and scientific texts.
  13. Establishing relationships between science, philosophy, art, religion, politics, etc.
  14. Explaining the specific notions of the History of Philosophy.
  15. Identifying the artistic imagery, placing it into its cultural context.
  16. Identifying the regulatory, stylistic or argumentative errors of a text.
  17. Interpreting the contents of a text about Theory of Art.
  18. Organizing their own time and work resources: designing plans with priorities of objectives, calendars and action commitments.
  19. Producing an individual work that specifies the work plan and timing of activities.
  20. Reading basic philosophical text thoroughly.
  21. Recognising, with a critical eye, philosophical referents of the past and present and assessing its importance.
  22. Submitting works in accordance with both individual and small group demands and personal styles.
  23. Using suitable terminology when drawing up an academic text.

Content

Thematic line of the subject In the Tercentenary of Immanuel Kant's death, the Aesthetics and Theory of Art Seminar will dedicate the 2024-2025 academic year to the systematic reading of the entirety of the Critique of the faculty of Judging, while adding other Kantian texts briefs and contemporary texts that update it. We will defend the discursive position that Kant's actuality lies in the fact that he founded the epistemic regime of uncertainty, and that it is in the KU where the conditions of possibility that opened up the necessary philosophical spaces for the emergence of this regime. Syllabus BLOCK I 1. The place of KU in Kantian production: the way back. 2. 2. Reading of the Appendix to KrV's Transcendental Dialectic: "The regulatory use of ideas" KrV A 641-669 / B669-697. 3. KU or the hegemony of as if, imagination and reflective judgment. 4. The link between the first and second parts of KU: the critical priority of the final cause. 5. Reading of the Analytics of Beauty, 1st definition (§§ 1-5) and 3rd (§§ 10-17): the Aristotelian anchoring of aesthetic disinterest. 6. Reading of the Analytica del Bell, 2nd definition (§§6-9) and 4ª (§§ 18-22). The condition of possibility that grounds uncertainty: the epistemology of the ability to judge reflectively. 7. Update: Rancière and the discomfort with aesthetics 8. Reading of the First Introduction to KU (I–IX). 9. Aesthetic ideas, the key to the epistemology of uncertainty. Reading of: Epistemic Grounds for a Deduction (§§ 30-38); the transmutation of common sense (§§ 39-42); the birth of the notion of art and artist (§§43-54). Block II 1. Reading of the Analytics of the Sublime (§§23-29). Update: Lyotard and the link between sublimity and reflection. 2. Transitivity between art and nature. Reading §§ 55-58 3. Reading §§ 59-60 Ethics, politics, aesthetics. 4. Update: Hannah Arendt and the possibility of a political reading of KU. 5. KU and the ideals of the late Enlightenment: Freedom, Equality, Fraternity in vulnerability. 6. Update: Rancière and the aesthetic revolution 7. Reading of the second part ofKU distributed among the students and assimilated to the proposals of the previous points. §§ 61-91. 8. Update: the deconstruction of teleology. Spivak and the critique of decolonial reason.


Activities and Methodology

Title Hours ECTS Learning Outcomes
Type: Directed      
Lectures, seminars, small-group and individual tutorials 60 2.4 19, 13, 14, 21
Type: Supervised      
Workshops on aesthetic practices, exhibition visits, artistic events, tests, participation in seminars 30 1.2 6, 9, 11, 12, 5, 23, 16, 17, 22
Type: Autonomous      
readings and conceptual work on the texts, work on images 52.5 2.1 3, 8, 9, 11, 19, 4, 20

The methodology is neo-Socratic, that is: the generation and transfer of knowledge from the vindication of the training potential of both students and
										
											teachers It is directed from the assumptions of the artivist group artencurs <https://artencurs.wixsite.com/artencurs>, of which Jèssica Jaques is the academic mentor. 
										
											 
										
											The two professors of the subject will usually be present simultaneously in the sessions. 
										
											 
										
											The directed activities consist of classes and discussion seminars with a high incentive for participation, as well as a program of tutorials in microgroups and individuals
										
											
										
											Supervised activities consist of contributions to seminars and contributions to tests.
										
											
										
											The independent activities have as an essential reference the reading of and the conceptual and application work on the texts and images to be evaluated.

Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.


Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title Weighting Hours ECTS Learning Outcomes
First and second exams 60 % 4.5 0.18 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 11, 13, 4, 14, 5, 17, 18, 22, 21
Third exercice (paper) 40% 3 0.12 3, 6, 1, 8, 9, 10, 11, 19, 13, 4, 14, 12, 5, 23, 16, 15, 17, 20, 22, 21


Tests 1 and 2. Two writings (Bloc 1 and 2) to be done at home For the first test, the student will have chosen a creative picassian practice - either their own or from a third person - that they will maintain throughout all assessments. 2000 words. Optionally, the student may choose to include their own aesthetic practices that are linked to their writing (photography, music, dance, illustration, painting: any creative practice. T
Test 3 will be a Podcast about one subject of the program.

 
 
Recovery, with a date and place set by the Faculty, is reserved for students who have not taken one of the three tests (being necessary to take 2/3) or who have failed one, two or three. Eachtest must be passed independently of the other two.
 
The student's grade will be "not evaluable" if at the end of the evaluation process they have not submitted one, two or three of the tests.
 

In the event that the tests cannot be done in person, their format will be adapted (maintaining their weighting) tothe possibilitiesoffered by the UAB’s virtual tools. Homework, activities and class participation will be done through forums, wikis and / or exercise discussions through Teams, etc. The teacher will ensure that the Student can access it or offer alternative means, which are within his / her reach.

 

The student's grade will be "non-evaluable" when at the end of the evaluation process he has not taken one, two or three of the tests.
 
The evaluation criteria will be:
 
The relevant selection of topics to be discussed when raising the main questions of Kantian texts, based on a work or another type of aesthetic reference
Argumentative clarity
The appropriate use of vocabulary linked to the subject
Demonstrating understanding of the content proposed in the theoretical sessions
Demonstrating understanding of the contents of the compulsory readings
The correction of the writing style
The ability to discuss with the group and about the texts.
Boldness in the appropriation of the contents (sapere aude), that is to say, the appropriation of the contents and the development of creativity
Plagiarism would give rise to careful training awareness work. It is worth saying that the relevant regulations say: "In the event that the student commits any irregularity that could lead to a significant variation in the grade of an assessment act, this assessment act will be graded with 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that can be instructed. In the event that several irregularities occur in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject will be 0".
The review of each test will be carried out during regular office hours in the period between this and the next test. The global ordinary revision of the subject will be carried out on a specific day that will be indicated in January, and will be in the office (in a non-pandemic situation; otherwise it will be digital.)
 
 
All important instructions will be written in Moodle, in order to leave a public written record.
 
This subject does not provide for the single assessment system.
 
 

Bibliography

Textos a treballar a classe

 

KANT, I., Crítica  de  la  facultat  de  jutjar. Traducció i edición de Jèssica Jaques, 2004. [Kritik der Urteilskraft (KU). Vol. V of Kants  gesammelte  Schriften. Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (AA.). Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 165–485. Edited by Wilhelm Windelband.

 

 

KANT, I., Crítica  de  la  razón  pura. Traducció i edició Miquel Montserrat. Barcelona, edicions de la UB, 2024 [Kritik der reinen Vernunft. AA. III]

 

KANT, I. Prolegòmens  a  tota  metafísica  futura  que pugui  presentar-se  com  a  ciència. Trad. Gerard Vilar, Ed. Pere Lluís Font, Barcelona, Ed. 62, 1996.

 

KANT, I., Fonamentació  de  la  metafísica  dels  costums. Trad. Joan Leita, Ed. Pere Lluís Font. Barcelona, Laia, 1984.

 

KANT, I., Crítica de la raó pràctica. Barcelona, edicions 62, “Textos Filosòficos” 93, 2003.

 

KANT, I., Briefwechsel, AA. X.  English translation by Arnulf Zweig, Correspondence. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999.

 

KANT, I., “On Friendship” and “On Enmity”, in Vorlesungen (Collins’s lecture notes), AA. XXVII, pp. 423-432. English translation cited in this article by Peter Heath, Lectures on Ethics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005. 

 

 

 

 

Bibliografia secundària d’especial atenció a les sessions del curs

 

ARENDT, Hannah, Conferencias sobre la filosofía política de Kant (Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy). Barcelona, Paidós, 2003 [1999].

 

LYOTARD, Jean-François, Lecciones sobre la Analítica de lo sublime [Leçons sur l’Analytique du sublime, 1991]. Ciudad de Méjico, LOM ediciones, 2020.

 

 

RANCIÈRE, Jacques, El malestar en la estética (Malaise dans l'esthttiéque, . Buenos Aires, Captital Intelectual, 2011.

 

RANCIÈRE, Jacques, “La revolución estética y sus resultados”.

 

SPIVAK, Gayatri Chakravorty, A critique of postcolonial reason : toward a history of the

vanishing present. Harvard, 1999.

 

 

Bibliografia secundaria d’acompanyament

 

Repertoris lexicals

 

CAYGILL, H., A  Kant  Dictionary., Oxford, Blackwell, 1995.

EISLER, R., Kant–Lexicon, Hildesheim, Georg Olms, 1984.

 

 

Estudis generals

 

 

BIRD, G.  (ed.), A Companion to Kant, Blackwell, 2010.

CASSIRER, E,. Das  Erkenntnisproblem  in  der  Philosophie  und  Wissenschaft der  neueren  Zei (1906)t . Vol. II Hidesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.. Hi ha traducció castellana, El  problema  del  conocimiento  en  la  filosofía  y  en  las  ciencias  modernas. Vol., II. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica 1986 (1953).

   ---  ,Kants  Leben  und  Lehre. Darmstadt: Wissenschafliche Buchgesellschaft.Hi ha traducció castellana: Kant,  vida  y  doctrina. Mèxico: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1979 (primera edició de 1948). 1918 (1975).

   ---  ,«Kant». A Encyclopaedia  of  the  Social  Sciences, vol. 8, 1932: 538-42. New York: Macmillan.

COLOMER, E., El pensamiento  alemán  de  Kant  a  Heidegger, I: La  filosofía  transcendental:  Kant.Barcelona,Herder, 1986.

De QUINCEY, T. ., Los últimos días de Immanuel Kant. Madrid, Valdemar, 2000. 

DELEUZE, G., La  philosophie  critique  de  Kant. París, PUF, 1971 (trad. cast. a Spinoza, Kant, Nietzsche, Barcelona, Labor, 1974).

GARCíA MORENTE, M., La  filosofía  de  Kant, Madrid, Espasa–Calpe, “Austral”,  1975.

GUYER, P. (Ed.), The  Cambridge  Companion  to  Kant, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992.

HEIDEGGER, M., Kant y el problema de la metafísica, Méxic: FCE,

HERNÁNDEZ, J., “La raó en el gir estètic de la filosofia (La racionalitat kantiana)”, Enrahonar 32/33, . 81–150.

Höffe, O., Immanuel Kant, Barcelona, Herder, 1986.

KUEHN, M., Kant. A  Biography. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001. Hi ha traducció castellana: Trad. cast.: Madrid, Acento Editorial, 2004).

RENAUT, A., Kant  ajourd’hui. Paris, Aubier, 1997; reed. “Champs–Flammarion”, 1999.

SCRUTON, R., Kant, Oxford University Presss, 2001.

villacañas, j. l. ,La  filosofía  teórica  de  Kant. Realismo  empírico  e  idealismo transcendental  en  el  criticismo,  los  niveles  de  su  uso  y  su  justificación. Valencia, Gules, 1985. 

   ---  , Racionalidad  Crítica.  Introducción  a  la  filosofía  de  Kant. Madrid, Tecnos, 1987.

   ---  , «Naturaleza y razón: Kant filósofo del clasicismo». A D.D.A.A. Kant e la  finalità  de  la  natura. A  duecento  anni  dalla  «Critica  del  giudizio». Padova: CEDAM. 13-74, 1989.

 

ENRAHONAR, 36 (2004), número extraordinari sobre Kant en el segon centenari.

 

 

Estudis sobre KU

 

ARENDT, H., Das  Urteilen.  Texte  zu  Kants  Polistischer  Philosophie, München / Zurich, 1998. 

ChÉdin, O., Sur  l'esthétique  de  Kant  et  la  théorie  critique  de  la  représentation. Paris, Vrin, 1982.

Cohen, T. amb Guyer, p. (ed.) Essays  in  Kant's  Aesthetics. Chicago & London, University of Chicago Press, 1982.

CRAWFORD, P., The  kantian  Sublime.  From  Morality  to  Art. Oxford – New York, 1989.

DUFFLO, C., La  finalité  dans  la  nature.  De  Descartes  a  Kant. París, PUF, 1996.

DUMOUCHEL, D., Kant  et  la  genèse  de  la  subjectivité  esthétique.  Esthétique  et  philosophie  avant  la  critique  de  la  faculté  de  juger.  Paris, Vrin, 1999.

GIBBONS, S. Kant's  Theory  of  Imagination.  Bridging  Gaps  in Judgement  and Experience. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994.

GINSBORG, H., The  Role  of  Taste  in  Kant’s  Theory  of  Cognition. New York – London, Garland, 1990.

Guillermit, L., L'élucidation  critique  du  jugement  de  goût  selon  Kant. Paris, Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1986.

GUYER, P.(ed.), Essays  in  Kant’s  Aesthetics. Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1982.

GUYER, P. Kant  and  the  Claims  of  Taste. Cambridge Mass., – London, Harvard University Press, 1979.

GUYER, P., Kant  and  the  Experience  of  Freedom.  Essays  on  Aesthetics  and  Morality. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993.

JAQUES, J., “Introducció” a KU. Barcelona, Edicions 62, 2004.

“Sobre la traducció del terme Urteilskraft ”, Enrahonar 36. Bicentenari de la mort d’Immanuel Kant. Pels camins de la raó crítica. (127–138), 2004. UAB, Servei de Publicacions

   ---   , “Memoria de una traducción. Sobre la versión catalana de la Kritik  der  Urteilskraft de Immanuel Kant ”. Ontology Studies, 2006, pp. 249–257

   ---   , “El sentido estético”, Disturbis 3 http://www.disturbis.net, 2008.

   ---   , “Kant’s Aesthetic Reading of Aristotle’s Philia: Disinterestedness and the Mood of the Late Enlightenment”. Revista de FilosofiaVI,  pp.57-68, 2012. http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RESF/article/view /41068

KEMAL, S., Kant  and  Fine  Art.  Essays  on  Kant  and  the  Philosophy  of  Fine Art  and  Culture. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1986.

KERN, A., Schöne Lust. Eine Theorie der ästhetischen Erfahrung nach Kant. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenshaft, Berlin 1998.

KERSZBERG, P., Kant  et  la  nature. La  nature   à  l’épreuve  de  la  critique. París, Les Belles Lettres, 1999.

KOGAN, J., La  estética  de  Kant  y  sus  fundamentos  metafísicos. Buenos Aires, EUDEBA, 1965.

KULEMKAMPF, J., Kants  Logik  des  ästhetischen  Urteils. Frankfurt am  main, Vittorio Klostermann, 1994.

KULEMKAMPF, J. (ed.), Materialen  zu  “Kants  Kritik  der  Urteilskraft”, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1974.

LEBRUN, G., Kant  et  la  mort  de  la  métaphisique (Essai  sur  la  “Critique  de  la  faculté  de  juger”). Paris, Armand Collin, 1970.

LÓPEZ  MOLINA, A. M., Razón  pura  y  juicio  reflexionante  en  Kant. Madrid, Universidad Complutense, 1983.

MAKKREEL, R. A., Imagination  and  interpretation  in  Kant.  The  Hermeneutical  Import  of  the  Critique  of  Judgement. Chicago – London, The University of Chicago Press, 1990.

McCLOSKEY, M., Kant’s  Aesthetics. New York, Macmillan, 1987.

McMILLAN, R. A. C., The  Crowing  Phase  of  the  Critical  Philosophy  (A  Study  in  Kant’s  “Critique  of  Judgement”). New York, Garland, 1970.

MartÍnez Marzoa, F., Desconocida  raíz  común.  Estudio  sobre  la  teoría  kantiana  de  lo bello, Madrid, Visor, 1987.

MUMBRÚ, Àlex, Esquema, símbolo, tipo. Barcelona, ed. Comares, 2022.

PARRET, H. (ed.), Kants  Ästhetik  /  Kant’s  Aesthetics  /  L’esthétique  de  Kant. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 1998.

PavÓn, M., Objetividad  y  juicio  en  la  crítica  de  Kant. Sevilla, Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad, 1988.

Rind, M., “The Concept of Disinterestedness in Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetics”. Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 40, no. 1 (2002), pp. 67-87.

RODRÍGUEZ ARAMAYO, R., y VILAR, G. (ed.), En  la  cumbre  del  criticismo (Simposio  sobre  la  “Crítica  del  Juicio”de  Kant), Barcelona, Anthropos, 1992.

Schaper, E. Studies in Kant's Aesthetics. Edinburg, Edinburgh University Press, 1979.

SOURIAU, M., Le  jugement  refléchissant  dans  la  philosophie  critique  de Kant. Paris, Alcan, 1926.

STOLNITZ, J., “On the Origins of ‘Aesthetic Disinterestedness’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 20, no. 2 (winter 1961), pp. 131-143.

VILLACAÑAS, J. L. (ed.), Estudios  sobre  la  “Crítica  del  Juicio”. Madrid, Visor, 1990.

 

 

Estudis sobre KrV

 

Allison, h. E., Kant's  Transcendental  Idealism. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1983 Hi ha traducció castellana: El  idealismo  trascendental  de  Kant.  Una interpretación  y  defensa. Barcelona: Anthropos y Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana de México.

JAQUES, J., "La revolución copernicana de Kant: la fundación de una metafísica relacional relativista”, Themata 34, 2005

Longuenesse, B., Kant  et  le  pouvoir  de  juger:  sensibilité  et  discursivité  dans l'analytique  transcendentale  de  la  «critique  de  la  raison  pure», Paris, PUF, 1993.

MARTÍNEZ MARZOA, F., Releer a Kant. Madrid, Anthropos, 1989.

montero, f. El  empirismo  kantiano. Valencia: Departamento de Historia de la filosofia de la Universidad de Valencia, 1973.

Strawson, P., The  Bounds  of  Sense.  An  Essay  on  Kant's  Critique  of  Pure Reason. London, Methuen and Co., 1996. Hi ha traducció castellana: Los  límites  del sentido.  Ensayo  sobre  la  «Crítica  de  la  razón  pura» de Kant . Madrid, Biblioteca de la Revista de Occidente.

TURRÓ, S., Tránsito  de  la  naturaleza  a  la  historia  en  la  filosofía  de  Kant, Barcelona — Iztapalpa, Anthropos, 1996.

 

Estudis sobre KpV

 

Allison,Henry, Kant's Theory of Freedom, Cambridge University Press, 1990

Heman, B., The Practice of Moral Judgement. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1993.

KORSGAARD, Ch.,  Las fuentes de la normatividad, México, UAM, 2000.

RAWLS, J.,  Lecciones sobre la historia de la fuilosofía moral, Barcelona, Paidós, 2001.

VELKLEY, R. L., Freedom and the End of Reason: On the Moral Foundation of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1989. WARD, K., The Development of Kant’s View of Ethics. Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1972.

VILAR, G., "La otra ética de Kant", en La razón insatisfecha, Barcelona, Crítica, 1999, cap. 2, pp. 29-51.

WOOD, A.,  Kant's Ethical Thought, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1999.

YOVEL, Y., Kant and the Philosophy of History, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.


Software

No especific software required.


Language list

Name Group Language Semester Turn
(SEM) Seminars 1 Catalan first semester morning-mixed
(TE) Theory 1 Catalan first semester morning-mixed