Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2503778 International Relations | OT | 4 | 2 |
You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject. Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2023.
A good level of English enough to follow theoretical classes, read the required texts, participate in seminars and submit work.
This course is designed to:
· Introduce students to some of the main contemporary international and internal migration scenarios in comparative perspective;
· Differentiate between the various categories, legal frameworks and perspectives involved in differentiating between forced and voluntary migration (a solid understanding of basic immigration patterns and legal structures);
· Learn about migration theories and its links with political sciences and IR;
· Understand the policy-making of migration and asylum policies (multilevel and multistakeholder approach);
· Learn about key debates in different geographic contexts (core concepts, relationships, and issues are involved in the immigration policy making);
· Explore key themes and debates in migration and refugee studies;
· Analysis the links between development and international migration;
· Foster critical thinking and academic research skills: critically evaluation of the pros and cons of liberal and restrictive approaches towards migration (criticize and evaluate political outcomes related to immigration policy).
Part 1. Introduction and key concepts and definitions
Part 2. The Making of Immigration Policies
Part 3. Forced migration: IDPs, refugees and asylum seekers
Part 4. Integration and inclusion policies and instruments
Part 5. The EU migration and asylum policies
International Migration is a course of 6 ECTS, these credits will be divided between lectures with debate, seminars with preseentations by students, tutorials and independent work by the students individually or in groups.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lectures with debate | 30 | 1.2 | 6, 1, 8, 11, 25, 18, 13, 14, 15, 17, 22, 21, 7, 24 |
Seminars and oral presentations of students | 24 | 0.96 | 2, 4, 10, 16, 5 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutorials | 16 | 0.64 | 7 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Study of the thematics of the course as well as complementary readings | 80 | 3.2 | 3, 23, 12, 9, 19 |
Students are asked to demonstrate basic knowledge of theoretical concepts in a balanced way for all parts of the course. To pass the course, the students should get at least a score of 4 in each of the planned exams. Once achieved this minimum grade of 4, final scores shall be made with weighted average grades of all works: when the final note weighted on both sides (exams and papers), plus assistance and participation in activities, is equal to or greater than 5 it will be considered that the subject will be passed. To pass the course, it is necessary but not sufficient to obtain a minimum of 4 in both exams.
The midterm exam will be held during the course, on the day set by the teacher, and will be announced in advance. The second and final exam will be at the end of the semester, the day set by the Faculty and will be announced in advance. The dates of practical works and other activities will be specified according to the programming and evolution of the subject (see Campus Virtual).
The practical works cannot be done after the fixed date.
Unique assessment:
Students who have requested it within the deadline and in the appropriate manner, will be able to take a single assessment which will consist of an exercise composed of an exam (60% of the grade) and a practical activity (40%).
This exercise will take place at the end of the semester, on the day set by the Faculty for the examination of the ordinary assessment, and will be made public in sufficient advance. If the student do not pass this test with a score of 5 out of 10, the exercise can be retaken on the date set by the Faculty as a compensatory assessment.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Final exam (Parts III-V) | 40% | 0 | 0 | 6, 23, 9, 11, 10, 25, 15, 22, 21, 19, 7, 24 |
Mid-term exam (Parts I&II) | 30% | 0 | 0 | 6, 2, 3, 23, 4, 12, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15, 16, 22, 20, 19, 5, 7, 24 |
Participation | 10% | 0 | 0 | 22, 5, 7 |
Short papers | 20% | 0 | 0 | 1, 12, 11, 25, 18, 13, 14, 17, 21, 19, 7 |
Arango, J. (2017). Theories of international migration. In International migration in the new millennium (pp. 25-45). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315252001-10/theories-international-migration-joaquin-arango
|
Betts, A. (2008). Global migration governance (No. 2008/43). GEG Working Paper. https://www.geg.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Betts_GEG%20WP%202008_43.pdf |
Boswell, C. (2007). Theorizing migration policy: Is there a third way?. International migration review, 41(1), 75-100. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27645653 |
Carens, J. H. (1987). Aliens and citizens: the case for open borders. The review of politics, 251-273. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1407506 |
Castles, S. (2004). Why migration policies fail. Ethnic and racial studies, 27(2), 205-227. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0141987042000177306 |
Cornelius, W. A., & Tsuda, T. (2004). Controlling immigration: The limits of government intervention. In Cornelius, W. et alt (Ed.) Controlling immigration: A global perspective, 2, 3-48. Stanford University Press, Stanford. |
De Haas, H., Czaika, M., Flahaux, M. L., Mahendra, E., Natter, K., Vezzoli, S., & Villares‐Varela, M. (2019). International migration: Trends, determinants, and policy effects. Population and Development Review, 45(4), 885-922. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/padr.12291 |
|
Freeman, G. P. (2006). National models, policy types, and the politics of immigration in liberal democracies. West European Politics, 29(2), 227-247. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01402380500512585 |
Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. (2014). International refugee law and refugee policy: the case of deterrence policies. Journal of Refugee Studies, 27(4), 574-595. https://academic.oup.com/jrs/article-abstract/27/4/574/2798182 |
Guild, E. (2006). The Europeanisation of Europe's asylum policy. International Journal of Refugee Law, 18(3-4), 630-651. https://academic.oup.com/ijrl/article-abstract/18/3-4/630/1537932 |
Guiraudon, V., & Lahav, G. (2000). A reappraisal of the state sovereignty debate: The case of migration control. Comparative political studies, 33(2), 163-195. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0010414000033002001?journalCode=cpsa |
Joppke, C. (1998). Why liberal states accept unwanted immigration. World politics, 266-293. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/world-politics/article/abs/why-liberal-states-accept-unwanted-immigration/7F3FE447EBEC0DCCFBB089C188F47034 |
Lahav, G., & Guiraudon, V. (2006). Actors and venues in immigration control: Closing the gap between political demands and policy outcomes. West European Politics, 29(2), 201-223. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01402380500512551 |
Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and development review, 431-466. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2938462 |
Meyers, E. (2000). Theories of international immigration policy—A comparative analysis. International migration review, 34(4), 1245-1282. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/019791830003400407?journalCode=mrxa |
Scholten, P., & Penninx, R. (2016). The multilevel governance of migration and integration. In Integration processes and policies in Europe (pp. 91-108). Springer, Cham. |
Thielemann, E. (2011). How Effective are Migration and Non-Migration Policies that Affect Forced Migration. Migration Studies Unit Working Papers, (2011/14). https://www.lse.ac.uk/government/Assets/Documents/pdf/research-groups/msu/WP-2011-14.pdf |
Triandafyllidou, A. (1998). National identity and the 'other'. Ethnic and racial studies, 21(4), 593-612. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/014198798329784 |
The specific programme will be posted in the campus virtual before the classes begin