Logo UAB
2023/2024

Comparative Criminology

Code: 103952 ECTS Credits: 6
Degree Type Year Semester
2500257 Criminology OT 4 1

Errata

The teacher responsable for the subject is Gustavo Fondevila Pérez (gustavo.fondevila@uab.cat).

Contact

Name:
Jose Cid Moline
Email:
josep.cid@uab.cat

Teaching groups languages

You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject. Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2023.


Prerequisites

This course requires a B2 level of English.


Objectives and Contextualisation

-      Understand the methodological problems related to the comparisons of crime across nations.

-      Understand the way in which crime data are collected across nations.

-      Understand the theoretical explanations of the evolution of crime across time and space.

-      Understand how a historical and cultural approach can help to explore differences in crime and the use of punishment in different countries.


Competences

  • Ability to analyse and summarise.
  • Accessing and interpreting sources of crime data.
  • Drawing up an academic text.
  • Generating innovative and competitive proposals in research and professional activity.
  • Reflecting on the foundations of criminology (theoretical, empirical and ethical-political ones) and expressing this in analysis and propositions.
  • Students must be capable of autonomously updating their criminological knowledge.
  • Students must demonstrate they comprehend the criminological theories.
  • Students must demonstrate they know a variety of criminal policies in order to face criminality and its different foundations.
  • Verbally transmitting ideas to an audience.
  • Working autonomously.
  • Working in teams and networking.

Learning Outcomes

  1. Ability to analyse and summarise.
  2. Applying the variety of criminal policies and their foundations in the criminological field.
  3. Drawing up an academic text.
  4. Effectively using the theoretical foundations of criminology.
  5. Finding and analysing crime databases.
  6. Generating innovative and competitive proposals in research and professional activity.
  7. Inferring the scientific knowledge of criminology in the applied field.
  8. Students must show interest for the scientific updates in the criminological field.
  9. Verbally transmitting ideas to an audience.
  10. Working autonomously.
  11. Working in teams and networking.

Content

1. Introduction

2. Theories on comparative criminology

3. Comparing crime and punishment in different time, space, and cultures.

4. Culture and the explanation of crime and victims in comparative criminology

5. Convictions statistics in comparative criminology

6. Policing and police cultures.

7. Criminal policies in comparative perspective. Criminal policies and welfare models.

8. Victim surveys in comparative perspective

9. International crimes and international criminal justice system.

10. The future of comparative criminology.


Methodology

- The course combines lectures and seminars. It requires reading a series of scientific articles for their discussion in class. In the seminars papers and other assignments will be discussed and submitted by the students.

- Before the starting of the course a detailed weekly schedule of activities will be provided.

Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.


Activities

Title Hours ECTS Learning Outcomes
Type: Directed      
Evaluation 5 0.2 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11
Lectures 18 0.72 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Seminar 18 0.72 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11
Type: Autonomous      
Required readings 54.5 2.18 10
Written assignment 54.5 2.18 1, 3, 4, 6, 10

Assessment

Evaluation assignments:

- The evaluation takes into consideration:

  • A paper summary and its presentation (20%).
  • Seminars participation activities (15%).
  • Cultural analysis exercice (10%).
  • A final academic essay of the course and its presentation (30%). 
  • Multiple-choice exam (25%)

Evaluation criteria:

- Essays out of time will not accepted and the student will get a fail mark (0), without possibility of late assignment. Only excuses based on illness or similar reasons may be accepted under proper justification. 

- Plagiarism in essays will conduct to a fail mark (0) and the student will lose the right of a new assessment. In case of relapse, the student will obtain a fail mark for the whole course (0) and will lose the right of a new assessment.

- It's necessary to obtain a final mean grade of 5 in order to pass the course.

- A minimum of 80% attendance to lectures and seminaris is requited to be assessed (only absences due to illneess or similar reasons are accepted).

- Classes start on time. Late arrival is not admitted. Also, leaving the class before its end without proper justification is not permitted.

Single assessment system

It will consist of two exams:

1rst) 4 questions on the mandatory reading of the course

2nd) Exercise to show the skills to do a comparative criminology analysis.


Assessment Activities

Title Weighting Hours ECTS Learning Outcomes
Academic essay 30% 0 0 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Article summary and presentation 20% 0 0 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10
Cultural analysis exercice 10% 0 0 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10
Multiple-choice exam 25% 0 0 2, 4, 5, 7, 8
Saminars participation activities 15% 0 0 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

Bibliography

Mandatory readings

Aebi M.  & Linde A. (2015). The epistemological obstacles in comparative criminology: A special issue introduction. European Journal of Criminology, 12(4), 381-385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815595311

Evans, T. D., Lagrange, R. L., & Willis, C. L. (1996). Theoretical development of comparative criminology: Rekindling an interest. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 20(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.1996.9678559

Friedrichs, D. O. (2007). Transnational crime and global criminology: Definitional, typological, and contextual conundrums. Social Justice, 34(2), 4-18.

Karstedt, S. (2001). Comparing cultures, comparing crime: Challenges, prospects and problems for a global criminology. Crime, Law and Social Change, 36, 285-308. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012223323445

Liu, J. (2007). Developing comparative criminology and the case of China: An introduction. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X06295774

Marshall, I. H., & Marshall, C. E. (1983). Toward a refinement of purpose in comparative criminological research: Research site selection in focus. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 7(1-2), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.1983.9688765

Nelken, D. (2002b). Comparing criminal justice. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (3rd ed., pp. 175-202).Oxford University Press.

Nivette, A. (2014). Legitimacy and crime: Theorizing the role of the state in cross-national criminological theory. Theoretical Criminology, 18(1), 93-111.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480613499793

Sebba, L., & Berenblum, T. (2014). Victimology and the sociology of new disciplines: A research agenda. International review of victimology, 20(1), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758013511657

Complementary references

Cavadino, M. & J. Dignan (2006). Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach. Sage.

Chockalingam, K. (2000). Female infanticide-A victimological perspective. In P. C. Friday & G. K. Kirchhoff (Eds.), Victimology at the transition from the 20th to the 21st century (pp. 273-287). World Society of Victimology

Elias, N. (1939/2000). The Civilizing Process. Blackwell.

Flint, C., M. Harrower, and R. Edsall. 2000. But how does place matter? Using bayesian networks to explore a structural definition of place. Paper presented at the New Methodologies for the Social Sciences Conference. University of Colorado, Boulder.

Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. E. (2002). Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. Wiley.

Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control. Oxford University Press.

Gieryn, T. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual review of Sociology, 26, 463–496.

Hedderman, C., & Hough, M. (1994). Does thecriminal justice system treat men and women differently? (Home Office Research Findings No. 10). Home Office.

Herek, G. M. (1992). The social context of hate crimes: Notes on cultural heterosexism. In G. M. Herek & K. T. Berrill (Eds.), Hate crimes (pp. 89-104). Sage

Koss, M. P. (1996). The measurement of rape victimization in crime surveys. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854896023001

LaFree, G. (2021). Progress and Obstacles in the Internationalization of Criminology. International Criminology, 1, 58-69.

Law, D. S. (2015). Judicial comparativism and judicial diplomacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 927-1036.

Massa Roldan, R., Fondevila, G., & García-Tejeda, E. (2021). Female homicide victimisation in Mexico: a group-based trajectory and spatial study. Global Crime, 22(2), 123-142. DOI: 10.1080/17440572.2020.1869539

Messner, S. F. (2014). Social institutions, theory development, and the promise of comparative criminological research. Asian Journal of Criminology, 9, 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-013-9175-1

Michaelis-Arntzen, E. (1994). Vergewaltigung [Rape]. Beck

Miethe, T. D., & Meier, R.F. (1994). Crime and its social context. State University of New York Press.

Mirrlees-Black, C., Budd, T., Partridge, S., & Mayhew, P. (1998). The 1998 British Crime. Home Office.

Muncie, J. (2006). Repenalisation and rights: Explorations in comparative youth criminology. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(1), 42-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2006.00403.x

Nagin, D. S., & A. R. Piquero (2010). Using the Group-based Trajectory Model to Study Crime over the Life Course. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21(2) 105–116. DOI: 10.1080/10511251003693637

Neapolitan, J. L. (1997). Cross-National Crime: A Research Review and Sourcebook. Greenwood Publishing Group.

Newman, G. R. (1977). Problems of method in comparative criminology. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 1(1-2), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.1977.9688627

Pogrebin, M. (Ed.). (2003). Qualitative Approaches to Criminal Justice. Sage.

Schneider, H. J. (1996). Violence in the institution. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 40, 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X96401002

Schwind, H. -D., Ahlborn, W., & Weiss, R. (1989). Dunkelfeldforschung in Bochum 1986/87 [Dark field research in Bochum 1986/87]. Bundeskriminalamt.

Shelley, L. I. (1981). Crime and Modernization: The Impact of Industrialization and Urbanization on Crime. Southern Illinois University Press.

Simon, J. (2007). Governing through Crime. Oxford University Press.

Stamatel, J.P. (2009) Contributions of cross-national research to criminology at the beginning of the 21st century. In: Krohn MD, Lizotte AJ and Hall GP (Eds.) Handbook on Crime and Deviance (pp. 3-32). Springer.

Szabo, D. (1975). Comparative Criminology. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 66(3), 366-379

Tonry, M. (2005) ‘Why are Europe’s Crime Rates Falling?’, ESRC newsletter, July: 8.

Ulmer, J. (2005). The localized uses of federal sentencing guidelines in four U.S. district courts: Evidence of processual order. Symbolic Interaction, 28(2), 255-280. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2005.28.2.255

Vilalta, C. J. (2013). How exactly does place matter in crime analysis? Place, space, and spatial heterogeneity. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24(3), 290-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2012.715659

Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Duke University Press

Williams,P., & Godson, R. (2002). Anticipating organized and transnational crime. Crime, Law and Social Change, 37, 311-355.

Zedner, L. (2002). Dangers of dystopias in penal theory. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 22, 341-366.

Zvekic, U. (1996). The international crime (victim) survey: Issues of comparative advantages and disadvantages. International Criminal Justice Review, 6, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/105756779600600101


Software

The course does not requires of specific software.