Logo UAB
2022/2023

Psychological Techniques in Forensics

Code: 44452 ECTS Credits: 12
Degree Type Year Semester
4317571 Legal and Forensic Psychology OB 0 1

Contact

Name:
Joan Deus Yela
Email:
joan.deus@uab.cat

Use of Languages

Principal working language:
spanish (spa)

Other comments on languages

The slides can be in Spanish.

Teachers

Mercè Jodar Vicente
Maria Claustro Jane Ballabriga
Jenny Cubells Serra
Oriol Granados Bartrons
Sergio Mora Cirujeda
Judit Castellà Arbós
Elena Garrido Gaitán
Rocio Pina Ríos
Anna Melendez Pereto

Prerequisites

There are none. It is highly recommended to have studied, in your degree, the subjects of Clinical Psychological Assessment in Adults and Childhood, Psychopathology of Adults and Childhood, Personality Disorders and Clinical Neuropsychology.

Objectives and Contextualisation

This module focuses on the psychological techniques necessary for good forensic psychological practice. Specifically, the objectives of this module focus on:

1. Knowing and knowing how to make good use of interview techniques and their adaptation according to the type of patient to be assessed.

2. Knowing, knowing how to use and interpret the most frequent psychometric evaluation and assessment tests in the forensic psychological field.

3. Know, know how to make good use and interpret the psychometric instruments that allow an assessment of personality, normal and pathological, as well as the possible psychopathology of the case.

4. Know, know how to use and be able to carry out an adequate interpretation of psychometric instruments that allow for the evaluation of intellectual capacity or intelligence.

5. To provide basic and essential foundations of forensic neuropsychology, social psychology and gender perspective.

6. To provide the fundamentals of basic psychology (eminently Memory of Testimonies and Content Analysis).

Competences

  • Analyse and organise the psychological information available in order to give advice in judicial processes.
  • Apply the applicable regulations and show ethical and professional responsibility in the practice of forensic psychology.
  • Contextualise the competences and specific concepts of general psychology within the area of legal and forensic psychology.
  • Organise and plan activities in order to achieve professional goals.
  • That students have the learning skills that enable them to continue studying in a way that will be largely self-directed or autonomous.
  • Use the basic techniques and suitable methodologies to draw up and defend judicial reports.

Learning Outcomes

  1. Analyse the ethical consequences of the professional practice of forensic psychology.
  2. Identify the techniques and measures of psychology that are applicable in the field of legal and forensic psychology.
  3. Organise and plan activities in order to achieve professional goals.
  4. Select the appropriate techniques for the defence of judicial reports.
  5. Systematically analyse the information available in legal proceedings.
  6. That students have the learning skills that enable them to continue studying in a way that will be largely self-directed or autonomous.

Content

The contents of this module are organised in a logical and coherent order, in such a way that the student can acquire them in a sequential and cumulative manner, in accordance with the training in forensic psychology. Specifically, the contents to be covered are:

1. Application of the forensic psychological interview: General process; Main difficulties; Simulation in the forensic interview; Practice and structure of the forensic criminal interview; The presentation, development and closure; Types of interview depending on the procedure: The civil and labour interview: process and framework of the interview; obtaining information in the criminal sphere; interviews in the family and canonical sphere.

2. Evaluation and assessment of intelligence. Assessment: Assessment of intelligence; Most relevant assessment tests; Description of their forensic use; Main problems of interpretation.

3. Evaluation and assessment of adult personality: normal and pathological personality assessment tests; most relevant assessment tests; description of their forensic use; main problems of interpretation.

4. Child psychometric assessment: Description and interpretation of the main psychometric tests; Projective assessment tests; Suitability for civil forensic practice and main limitations.

5. Neuropsychological assessment and evaluation: Most relevant neuropsychological assessment tests; Description of their forensic use; Assessment of executive functions; Main problems of interpretation. Global evaluation and interpretation of different measures.

6. Diagnostic neuropsychological assessment: Fundamentals of neuropsychological diagnosis; Main tools and their application to forensic psychology.

7. Evaluation of simulation: Psychology of Memory and Accuracy; Evolutionary memory disorders; Simulation in criminal, civil and labour processes; Simulation, dissimulation and exaggeration; Evaluation and Forensic Implications.

8. Integration of assessment in the forensic field: Assessment tests in forensic practice: selection, interpretation and limits; Adequacy and selection of assessment tests; Forensic interpretation; Limits in their forensic use; Global synthesis of the general interpretation of the different assessment measures and integration of the assessment results together with interviews and other sources of information obtained.

9. Fundamentals of mediation: Concept of reparation and restitution. Objectives and strategies of criminal mediation (restorative justice).

10. Social psychology applied in the forensic field: Prison Training Programmes and MPA. Characteristics of the programmes and group intervention.

11. Psychology of memory. Forensic applications: Importance of the witness in the legal process. Accuracy and memory factors. Encoding, retention and retrieval factors.
 
12. Cognitive psychology in the field of emergencies: Fundamentals of victim assistance in emergency situations. Relevant aspects for forensic assistance and subsequent intervention.

Methodology

The teaching methodology of the subject is aimed at promoting decision-making skills, planning skills, autonomy and a critical attitude. The aim is for the student to be able to decide, according to the hypotheses formulated in the case, the procedure, the most appropriate forensic psychological evaluation and, finally, to culminate the evaluation process with the oral and written transmission (report) of the results. It is necessary for the student to be proactive in the search for information regarding the current state of the different instruments of forensic psychological evaluation.

The teaching methodology of this module can be divided into three blocks:

1. Directed teaching. This is structured in a compulsory attendance activity: Cycle of lectures, face-to-face modality, supported by multimedia technologies and carried out in large groups. The aim is for the student to be able to obtain the main theoretical concepts of the techniques within the field of forensic psychology. The duration of this activity will be a minimum of 36 hours for all students in the module.

2. Supervised Activity. This consists of problem-based learning (PBL), centred on the description of real cases in the classroom from which the aim is to encourage debate and the resolution of the case in the context of the forensic psychological techniques to be used. This activity will be used in conjunction with and during directed teaching.

3. Autonomous Activity. The student's autonomous work activities include, in addition to the study and bibliographic search, the reading of specialised or complementary content materials of special interest for the acquisition of the subject's competences.

Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

Activities

Title Hours ECTS Learning Outcomes
Type: Directed      
Masterclasses 60 2.4 1, 2, 3, 4
Type: Supervised      
Problem-solving classes; problem-based learning and discussions. 12 0.48 5, 1, 2, 3, 4
Type: Autonomous      
Personal study; reading of articles or reports of interest; preparation of assignments. 220 8.8 5, 2, 6, 4

Assessment

The assessment of the subject contains individual and collective or group evidence of learning for a maximum of 5 students, according to the assessment guidelines set by the Faculty of Psychology (https://www.uab.cat/doc/DOC_Pautes_Avaluacio_2022_2023). Three learning evidences have been designed, with different weights each, which allow for continuous assessment.

A. Collective learning evidence (EV2). This evidence is carried out in groups of a minimum of 3 to a maximum of 5 students. The undeveloped sections (interpretation of psychometric tests administered, summary and expert considerations, and conclusions for the case) of a written expert report will be finalised. The total mark for this evidence of learning is worth a maximum of 40% of the final mark for the module.

B. Individual learning evidence. Two evidences have been designed: 1) Practical tests (EV3). A minimum of 3 written tests. This evidence consists of a written multiple choice multiple choice test, in classroom mode, of 5 questions on a forensic case of a specific topic given in the module in classroom format. The practical case will be placed in the moodle, with time prior to attending the seminar involved in order to be worked on by the student, and the 5 multiple choice questions will be answered during the last part of the class with a discussion in the classroom on the correct answers to the case. The total mark for this evidence of learning is worth a maximum of 40% of the final mark for the module; 2) Oral defence of the work (EV1). The student is asked to write a short written report, constructive criticism detailing successes and points for improvement, no longer than one page, on the professional performance of a psychologist during an oral hearing, either recorded or in which the student has been able to attend the trial in person. The procedure may be civil or criminal. The total mark for this learning evidence is worth a maximum of 20% of the final mark for the module.

In order to obtain a final grade for the module or subject, which is between 0 and 10, the student must have presented the 3 proposed learning evidences. The final grade for the module is made up of the following formulation: Final grade= [(EV1x0.2) + (EV2x0.4) + (EV3x0.4)]. Each of the learning evidences has a previously indicated weighted weight.

Definition of evaluable student-student: a student who has completed all the proposed learning evidences with a weight equal to or higher than 4 points (40%) will be considered as "evaluable".

Definition of passing the module-subject: a student has passed the subject-module when he/she has presented all the proposed learning evidences, obtaining a minimum total of 5 points in the continuous assessment, with a minimum of 3.5 points or more (on a scale of 0-10) in learning evidences 2 and 3. In case of not achieving this requirement the maximum grade that the student can obtain is 4.9 points (fail). The student who does NOT present all the learning evidences will NOT pass the subject-module, even if the global computation of the grade is equal or higher than 5. Once the subject-module has been passed (grade > 5) NO systems can be established to improve the final grade.

Make-up test. Only those students who have a continuous assessment grade higher or equal than 3.5 points, but lower than 5 points, will be able to take this test. In order to be eligible for this test, students must have been previously assessed in a set of activities, the weight of which is equivalent to a minimum of 2/3 of the total grade of the subject-module. This recovery test will consist of 40 written multiple-choice questions corresponding to the content taught in the 12 seminars that make up the module. This recovery test does not serve to raise a mark if a student has already passed it. Evidences 1 to 3 cannot be recovered as they are continuous assessment activities, individual or group, throughout the course. The maximum mark that a student who takes the recovery test can obtain in the overall subject is a 5.

It is not foreseen that students in the second or subsequent registration will be assessed by means of a single synthesis test.

Assessment Activities

Title Weighting Hours ECTS Learning Outcomes
Oral defence of the work. 20 3 0.12 5, 1, 2, 6
Practical tests. 40 1 0.04 5, 1, 2, 3, 4
Submission of reports / papers. 40 4 0.16 5, 1, 2

Bibliography

GENERAL BIBLIOGRAPHY

CARLOS SIERRA J, JIMENEZ EM, BUELA CASAL G. Psicología forense. Madrid: Editorial Biblioteca Nueva, 2013.

CARRASCO M.A., RAMIREZ I., Del BARRIO V. Evaluación Clínica. Diagnóstico, formulación y constrastación de los trastornos psicológicos. Madrid: Editorial Sanz y Torres, 2013.

DEL ROCÍO M, HERMOSO G. Manual de psicología forense. Madrid: Desclée Browers, 2022.

GARRIDO GAITÁN E, LOVELLE IGLESIAS MI, MORA MONTSERRAT S, PINA RÍOS, R. Introducción a la psicología forense. Barcelona: Editorial UOC, 2020.

VÁZQUEZ MÉZQUITA B. Manual de psicología forense. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis, 2007.

VÁZQUEZ MÉZQUITA B. Casos prácticos en psicología forense. Madrid: Editorial: Giunti Psychometrics SL, 2008. 

SPECIFIC BIBLIOGRAPHY

AIKEN LR. Tests psicológicos y evaluación. Méjico: Editorial Pearson, Prentice Hall, 2003. Undécima edición.

ARCE R, FARIÑA F, NOVO M, VáÁZQUEZ MJ. Evaluación forense de la enfermedad mental en la incapacidad temporal: simulación y realidad. España: Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales, Gobierno de España, 2006.

BERMÚDEZ AM, BERMÚDEZ MP. Manual de psicología infantil. Técnicas de evaluación y tratamiento. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva, 2013.

CABALLO-MANRIQUE, VE. Manual para la evaluación clínica de los trastornos psicológicos: estrategias de evaluación, problemas infantiles y trastornos de ansiedad. Madrid: Pirámide, 2005.

CONROY MA, KWARTNER PP. Malingering. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 2006;2(3):1-23.

DÍAZ CE. La simulación y la disimulaciónen medicina evaluativa. Medicinay Seguridad del Trabajo, 2014;60(235):379-391.

HOGAN TP. Pruebas psicológicas. Una introducción práctica. Madrid: Manual Moderno, 2015.

INDA M, LEMOS S, LÓPEZ AM, ALONSO JL. La simulación de enfermedad física o trastorno mental Papeles del Psicólogo, 2005;26:99-108.

JARNE A, ALIAGA A. Manual de neuropsicología forense. Barcelona: Editorial Herder, 2011.

JIMÉNEZ-GÓMEZ, F. Evaluación Psicológica Forense 1: fuentes de información, abusos sexuales, testimonio, peligrosidad y reincidencia. Ediciones Amarú, 2006.

JIMÉNEZ-GÓMEZ, F. Evaluación Psicológica Forense 2: matrimonio y procesos de protección con el menor. Ediciones Amarú, 2006.

JIMÉNEZ-GÓMEZ, F. Evaluación Psicológica Forense 3: ámbitos delictivos, laboral y elaboración de informes. Ediciones Amarú, 2009.

MANZANERO AL. Memoria de Testigos. Obtención y Valoración de la Prueba Testifical. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide, 2010.

PORTELLANO-PÉREZ, JA. Neuropsicología de la atención, de las funciones ejecutivas y la memoria. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis, 2014.

RAMÍREZ-GONZALEZ M. Evaluación psicológica de las custodias infantiles. Madrid: Editorial Pirámide, 2022.

RODRÍGUEZ AGUADO, V. Manual parala redacción de informes periciales psicologicos (Psicología). Madrid: Editorial: Giunti Psychometrics SL, 2022.

RODRIGUEZ-RUÍZ D, CEJUDO J, PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, JC. Compendio y análisis de medidas de evluación de la inteligencia emocional. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación, 2019;51(2):99-115.

SORACI SA, CARLIN MT, READ JD, POGODA TK, WAKEFORD Y, CAVANAGH S, SHIN L. Psychological impairment, eyewitness testimony, and false memories: Individual differences. In Toglia MP, Read JD, Ross D F, Lindsay RCL (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology, Vol. 1. Memory for events (p. 261–297). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2007.

VALLEJO RD, GESTOSO CG. Mediación. Procesos, tácticas y técnicas. Madrid: Editorial Pirámide,2006. Tercera Edición.

Software

Session

Date

Modality

Professor

Contents

 

1

Dimarts

29.11.2022

5h

 

Presencial

 

Elena Garrido

 

Applications of forensic interviewing

    

     2

Dijous

01.12. 2022

5h

 

Presencial

 

Oriol Granados

 

Intelligence Assessment-Evaluation

 

3

Dimarts

13.12.2022

5h

 

Presencial

 

Claustre Jané

 

Child psychometric assessment

 

4

Dijous

15.12.2022

5h

 

Presencial

 

Joan Deus

 

Evaluation-Assessment of the adult personality

 

5

Dimarts

20.12. 2022

5h

 

Presencial

 

Mercè Jodar

 

Valoració-Avaluació Neuropsicològica

 

6

Dijous

22. 12.2022

5h

 

Presencial

 

Mercè Jodar

 

Neuropsychological Assessment-Evaluation

 

7

Dimarts

10. 01. 2023

5h

 

Presencial

 

Sergio Mora

 

Simulation assessment

 

8

Dijous

12. 01. 2023

5h

 

Presencial

 

Rocío Pina

 

Psychology of memory: forensic applications

 

9

Dimarts

17. 01. 2023

5h

 

Presencial

 

Judit Castellà

 

Cognitive psychology in the field of emergencies

 

10

Dijous

19. 01. 2023

5h

 

Presencial

 

Elena Garrido

 

Integration of assessment in the forensic field

 

11

Dimarts

24. 01. 2023

5h

 

Presencial

 

Jenny Cubells

 

Social Psychology applied to the forensic field

 

12

Dijous

26. 01. 2023

5h

 

Presencial

 

Anna Meléndez

 

Fundaments of mediation

       

The established programme may be modified for teaching reasons or for reasons beyond the coordination's control, and students will be promptly informed of any possible changes.