Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
4315497 Communication and Language Disorders | OT | 0 | 1 |
For the correct development of the subject, students will have to have previous knowledge about the disorders acquired from communication and language, which can be the basis for the extension and updating of the theoretical-practical contents that will be worked on scheduled sessions
The general objective of this assigment is focused on research, diagnosis and neurorehabilitation and neurostimulating treatment in neurological and neuropsychological pathologies that address language and/ r speech disorders, both in childhood and in old age adult, secondary to idiopathic brain damage or acquired brain injury, and that affect the process of communication.
The specific objectives are:
1. Acquire the essential knowledge about the ethiopathogenesis and semiology of acquired disorders of language and speech in neurological and neuropsychological pathology.
2. To be able to develop an appropriate process of speech therapy assessment in these pathologies, according to the clinical acquired language disorder and/or speech presented by the patient of study.
3. To be able to design a suitable program of speech therapy intervention, either through neurorehabilitation or by neurostimulation, considering a multidisciplinary approach to acquired language disorder and/or objective and secondary speech to a neurological pathology with a neuropsychological deficit.
1. Etiology of acquired brain damage.
2. Update and progress in research and evaluation of acquired brain damage.
3. Evaluation of brain lesions in children.
4. Evaluation of brain lesions in adults.
5. Update and progress in the neurorehabilitation of acquired brain damage.
6. Bases of language neurorehabilitation (aphasias, aging and dementia).
7. Basis for speech neurorehabilitation (disartria and anartria).
8. Basis of the neurorehabilitation of swallowing (dysphagia).
9. Technological innovation applied to speech therapy.
The contents of the subject will be based on guided activities: expository classes in face-to-face mode, lectures, problem-based learning and debates; supervised activities: tutorials; and autonomous activities: elaboration of written works, presentation of oral works, reading of articles and reports of interest and personal study. Attend a minimum of 80% of the sessions to be evaluated.
The proposed teaching and assessment methodologies may experience some modifications as a result of the restrictions on face-to-face learning imposed by the health authorities. The teaching staff will use the Moodle classroom or the usual communication channel to specify whether the different directed and assessment activities are to be carried out on site or online, as instructed by the Faculty.
Note: The teaching staff will allocate approximately 15 minutes of the last teaching class to allow students to answer the questions for the evaluation of the teaching performance and the evaluation of the subject or module.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Expositive classes | 22.5 | 0.9 | 1, 7, 8, 10, 9, 12, 14, 13, 16, 5, 2, 17, 6 |
Learning based on problems and debates | 9 | 0.36 | 1, 11, 10, 12, 14, 13, 16, 5, 17, 15, 6 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutorials | 6.5 | 0.26 | 10, 12, 13 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Elaboration of written works | 20 | 0.8 | 3, 4, 14, 16, 5, 17, 6 |
Personal study | 60 | 2.4 | 7, 8, 3, 4, 14, 16, 5, 17, 6 |
Presentation of written works | 7 | 0.28 | 3, 4, 14, 16, 5, 17, 6 |
Reading articles and reports | 25 | 1 | 3, 4 |
Three types of learning evidence will be performed: 1) attendance and participation in scheduled activities (individual) (EV1); 2) written delivery and/or oral defense of papers and reports (group) (EV2); and 3) closed written test with multiple-choice questions (individual). Students must have submitted all the learning evidence defined to be "assessable" and with a weight equal to or greater than 4 points (40%) of all the learning evidence submitted may not be included in acts as "not evaluable".
In order to calculate the average between the different grades, it will be essential to obtain a grade equal to or greater than 5 in the individual exercise and 3.5 in the rest of the activities. The module will be considered suspended when the average mark of the three evaluation activities is not exceeded with a 5.
In the 19th or 20th week of the semester, students will have the option of recovering the individual EV3 (multiple test) that they did not pass and previously presented. In order to access the recovery test, the teaching team may require having obtained a minimum average grade for the subject/module. In case of doing so, this mark will be equal to or less than 3.5. The individual written recovery will consist of a closed written test with multiple choice multiple choice questions about the theoretical content not passed.
No unique final synthesis test for students who enrole for the second time or more is anticipated.
normative link of the assessment: https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/graus/graus/avaluacions-1345722525858.html
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assistance and participation in the programmed activities (individual) | 50% | 0 | 0 | 7, 8, 10, 12, 14, 13, 16, 5, 17, 6 |
Writing and/or oral defense of work and reports (group) | 30 | 0 | 0 | 11, 10, 9, 3, 4, 12, 14, 13, 16, 5, 17, 15, 6 |
Written exam | 40 | 0 | 0 | 1, 7, 8, 14, 16, 5, 2, 17, 6 |
Fundamental Bibliography:
Triviño M, Arnedo M & Bembibre J. (2020). Neuropsicología a través de casos clínicos. Evaluación y rehabilitación. Madrid: Médica Panamericana.
Arnedo M, Bembibre J. & Triviño M. (2015). Neuropsicología infantil a través de casos clínicos. Barcelona: Médica Panamericana.
Artigas J. & Narbona J. (2011). Trastornos del neurodesarrollo. Barcelona: Viguera.
Chomel-Guillaume, S., Leloup, G. & Bernard I. (2010). Les aphasies: évaluation et rééducation. Paris: Masson.
Jurado M. Q., Mataró M. & Pueyo, R. (2014). Neuropsicología de las enfermedades neurodegenerativas. Madrid: Síntesis.
Tirapu, J., Rios, M. & Maestú, F. (2011). Manual de Neuropsicología (2ª edició). Barcelona: Viguera.
Webb, W. & Adler, R. (2010). Neurología para el logopeda. Barcelona: Masson.
Furher Reading:
Alberca, R. & López-Pousa S. (2011). Enfermedad de Alzheimer y otras demencias. Barcelona: Médica Panamericana.
Cuetos, F. (2012). Neurociencia del Lenguaje. Madrid: Médica Panamericana.
Cuetos, F. González, J & De Vega, M. (2015). Psicología del lenguaje. Madrid: Médica Panamericana.
Damasio, A. (2010). I el cervell va crear l’home. Barcelona: Destino.
De Noreña, D., Ríos-Lago, M, Bombín-González, I., Sánchez-Cubillo, I., García-Molina, A. &Tirapu-Ustárroz, J. (2010). Efectividad de la rehabilitación neuropsicològica en el daño cerebral adquirido: atención, velocidad de procesamiento, memoria y lenguaje. Revista de Neurologia, 51 (11), 687-698.
Deví, J. & Deus,J. (2004). Las demencias y la enfermedad de Alzheimer: una aproximación pràctica e interdisciplinar. Barcelona: ISEP Universidad.
Deus, J., Sáinz M.P & Deví, J. (2018). Neuropsicología de la enfermedad de Alzheimer. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.
Dieguez-Vide, F. & Peña-Casanova, J. (2012). Cerebro y Lenguaje. Sintomatologia neurolingüística. Madrid. Médica Panamericana.
Ellis, D.W. & Young, A.W. (1992). Neuropsicologia cognitiva humana. Barcelona: Masson.
Fernandez, S. & López-Higes, R (2005). Guía de intervención logopédica en las afasias. Madrid: Síntesis.
González, P. & González, B. (2012). Afasia, de la teoría a la práctica. México: Médica Panamericana.
Marcus, G. & Rabagliati, H. (2006). What developmental disorders can tell us about the nature and origins of language. Nat Neurosci. 9(10): 1226-1229.
Martí-Vilalta J. L. & Martí-Fábregas J. (2012). Enfermedades vasculares cerebrales. Madrid: Médica Panamericana.
Peña-Casanova, J. (2007). Neurología de la Conducta y Neuropsicología. Madrid: Médica Panamericana.
Pérez García, M. (2009). Manual de neuropsicologia clínica. Madrid: Pirámide.
Purves, D., Augustine, G.J., Fitzpatrick, D., Hall, W.C., Lamantia, A.S., Mcnamara, J.O. & Williams, S. (2007). Neurociencia (3ª edició). Buenos Aires: Médica Panamericana.
Small, S.L. & Llano, D.A. (2009). Biological approaches to aphasia treatment. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 9(6):443-50.
Stanfiield, C. (2011). Principios de fisiologia humana. Madrid: Pearson.
Subhash, C. & Orlando, J. (1997). Neurociencia para el estudio de las alteraciones de la comunicación. Barcelona: Masson.
Thibodeau, M. (2010). Anatomia y fisiología humana. Barcelona: Mosby.
Tresguerres, J. (2011). Fisiología humana. Madrid: Mc Graw Hill.
White, E.J., Hutka, S.A., Williams, L.J. & Moreno, S. (2013). Learning, neural plasticity and sensitive periods: implications for language acquisition, music training and transfer across the lifespan. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 90.
There is no.