Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2502442 Medicine | OB | 2 | 2 |
Students must have passed the subject of Clinical Care Practice I of the first Medicine degree. In addition, it is necessary the acquirement of some basic knowledge level of:
The commitment to preserve the confidentiality and professional secrecy of the data to which they may have access due to the learning in assistance services and audiovisual material must be acquired. Likewise, an attitude of professional ethics will be maintained in all their actions.
The subject Clinical Care Practice II is taught in the second year of the Degree in Medicine and is part of the Clinical Practice Subject with the aim of bringing students closer to clinical practice from the first year of the degree. The experience lived in the subject Clinical Care Practice I has allowed students to know the operation of a Primary Care Center and have a first contact with people using the health system.
Medicine practice is based on an interpersonal relationship that takes place within a community context. This subject aims to point students out the importance of behaviors, psychological states, beliefs, expectations, desires, and attitudes of people and the community in which they live in their health-disease processes, as well as the relevance of the communication skills of health professionals in the relationship with patients and relatives and with other professionals.
More specifically, the Clinical Care Practice II subject aims to: 1) improve the integration of verbal and non-verbal communication elements for the understanding of care activity, 2) delve into patient-centered care and the biopsychosocial model application, 3) know and encourage patients' motivation springs for behavior change through the motivational interview model, 4) convey the importance of measuring, recording, and systematizing the received information from both the history and the physical examination (exploratory phase of the interview), and 5) recognize, in their community, the social determinants and health assets that can influence in the health-disease process.
The achievement of the subject competencies will allow students to begin their interpersonal and communication skills training that is related to obtaining more appropriate and more information. Fact that improves patients' and health professionals' satisfaction levels, accomplishes greater diagnostic accuracy, and enables the design of a therapeutic plan adapted to the patients' characteristics with a greater probability of therapeutic compliance, among others. The vision of health as an individual objective determined by health care will be broadened towards a vision of health as a collective objective determined by relationships between people and its community structures.
The subject Clinical Care Practice II is a two-department subject.
The Department of Medicine is responsible for teaching related to:
In the first seminar, within each group of practices, work 5-people-teams will be created. This team will work on a practical case related to the practices in the Primary Care Centers (CAPs). The work teams will remain the different teaching activities linked to SESP and PLAB. A spokesperson of each group will be appointed and will be in charge of making the assignments and maintaining communication with the teachers.
The case will be presented orally in the fifth seminar (see Evaluation Section).
The members of the teaching staff responsible for this part are: Xavier Mundet Tuduri, Raquel Gayarre Aguado and Esther Limón Ramírez.
The Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine is responsible for teaching related to:
The teacher in charge is Beatriz Molinuevo Alonso.
Students carry out 3 stays (Clinical Care Practice; PCA) in a Primary Care Center lasting 4 hours each (1-2 students per teacher) linked to the knowledge and skills acquired in the SESP i PLAB.
The members of the teaching staff responsible for this part are: Xavier Mundet Tuduri, Raquel Gayarre Aguado, Esther Limón Ramírez and Beatriz Molinuevo Alonso.
The CAP application will be made from SIGMA @: https://sia.uab.es/Registration and file / Registration for the Final Project / Internship
Contact details for justified requests for changes and incidents are:
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
CLINICAL CARE PRACTICES | 14 | 0.56 | 1, 2, 4, 14, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 9, 12, 10, 13, 15, 16, 3 |
LABORATORY PRACTICES | 9 | 0.36 | 1, 4, 14, 5, 6, 7, 11, 9, 15, 3 |
SPECIALIZED SEMINARS | 10 | 0.4 | 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15, 16, 3 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
PREPARATION OF WRITTEN WORKS (GROUP WORK) | 8 | 0.32 | 1, 2, 4, 14, 5, 6, 7, 11, 9, 10, 13, 15 |
REPORTS OF INTEREST (PROTOCOL OF OBSERVATION) | 3 | 0.12 | 1, 4, 6, 7, 11, 9, 10, 15, 3 |
SELF-STUDY | 26 | 1.04 | 1, 2, 4, 14, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 9, 10, 13, 15, 16 |
REQUIREMENTS TO PASS THE SUBJECT:
EVALUATION
The continuous evaluation of the subject Clinical Care Practice II will be based on:
a) Attendance and active participation in seminars and practical sessions:
Attendance at the five seminars (SESP) will generate a grade of 10. Failure to attend any of the first four seminars will generate a grade of 0.
Attendance at the fifth seminar is mandatory (group work is presented and evaluated).
Attendance at the four laboratory practice sessions (PLAB) will generate a grade of 10. Attendance at three of the four practices will generate a grade of 0.
During each visit to the CAP, each student will have a specific observation protocol to train the competencies proposed by the teachers in the previous sessions of SESP and PLAB and to be able to collect observations that will be useful to him/her later to work in small groups (fixed work teams of 5 people established within each internship group). The interlocutor of each team will have to deliver through the Virtual Campus each protocol worked in group (a total of three) inside the calendar of deliveries foreseen in the beginning of the subject in the second semester. These protocols are the subject of work during the PLAB. Students will have a script and assessment rubrics on the virtual campus. Each group protocol delivered in the established term (corresponding session of practices) will generate a note according to a scale of three values: Regular (0); Good (5) and Excellent (10). If a protocol is not suitable, the teacher may require the group to repeat it and indicate the maximum grade that can be obtained in a second review. The members of each work team will have the same qualification. Students can consult the feedback on the work and through the Qualifications tool of the Virtual Campus.
Teachers may require students to explain in the classroom the cases observed and described in the individual protocols.
This part has a weight of 19% in the final mark of the subject that would be distributed as follows:
- Seminars: 5%
- Internships: 5%
- Observation protocols: 9% (each protocol weighs 3%)
b) Examination:
The exam is a multiple-choice question test with five answer options (a single valid answer). A correction will be applied to discount random hits [Corrected Score = (hits- (errors / 4))] which will be transformed into a note that can range from 0 to 10.
The examination date will be the scheduled date according to the official calendar of the Faculty of Medicine.
The subject to be evaluated corresponds to all the theoretical and practical contents of the subject. The students will have study material on the Virtual Campus, which must be completed with the reference book of the subject (Introduction and chapters from 1 to 7; see section Specific bibliography) and with readings that are indicated in certain sessions.
The exam is considered passed with a gradeof 5 or higher.
After each exam, students will have a period of 24 hours to send, through the Virtual Campus, comments, or complaints about the questions, which will be analyzed by teachers. Students can consult their provisional grade through the Qualifications tool of the Virtual Campus. The revision of the evaluation will be carried out individually under the request of tutoring with the coordination of the subject.
This part has a weight of 50% in the final grade of the subject.
c) Elaboration of group work and oral defense of a clinical case and its community approach.
Students must carry out group work related to the seminars (SESP) held at the UDCMB and the stays at the CAP (PCA).
To carry out this activity, which starts from the first seminar, we will work according to the teams formed in the mentioned session.
Students will have a script and assessment rubric on the Virtual Campus. The members of each work team will have the same qualification.
This part has a weight of 31% in the final grade of the subject.
RECOVERY
Students who have not passed the exam (note 5), or have not taken, will be able to have another exam, if the first five requirements to pass the subject have been met.
Students who meet any of the following conditions may have another exam:
The examination date will be the scheduled date according to the official calendar of the Faculty of Medicine.
FINAL NOTE OF THE SUBJECT
Final grade = (Attendance at the five SESPs * 0.05) + (Attendance at the four PLABs * 0.05) + (Observation protocols * 0.03 for each protocol) + (Examination grade*0.50) + (note Group work * 0.31).
This formula will only be applied in the event that the requirements to achieve the subject have been met.
The final grade of students who have not passed the exam after the new test, will be:
1) If the resulting grade after applying the formula to calculate the Final Grade is ≤ 4.7, that grade will be placed.
2) If the resulting grade after applying the formula for calculating the Final Grade is> 4.7, the final grade will be 4.7.
Students who do not meet any of the following requirements will be assigned a rating of "not assessable":
1) Minimum attendance at five SESPs
2) Minimum attendance at three PLABs
3) Completion of the three stays (PCA) in a CAP with apt qualification.
4) Group delivery of three observation protocols.
5) Carrying out group work and participating in oral defense.
6) Carrying out the multiple-choice test.
The revision of the evaluation will be carried out individually under the request of tutoring with the coordination of the subject.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Attendance and active participation in specialized seminars, laboratory practices and health care centers | 19% | 1 | 0.04 | 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 9, 10, 13, 3 |
Oral defense of written group work | 31% | 2 | 0.08 | 1, 4, 14, 5, 6, 7, 11, 9, 10, 15, 3 |
Written evaluation: Objective tests (multiple choice questions) | 50% | 2 | 0.08 | 1, 2, 14, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 9, 12, 10, 13, 16 |
Specific references:
*Both are optimal.
Other references:
Not necessary.