Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500891 Nursing | OB | 4 | 0 |
There has been changes in the responsible of the subject, now is the teacher Sabiniana San Rafael Gutiérrez (sabiniana.sanrafael@uab.cat)
It is necessary to have passed at least two thirds of the total credits of the study plan (160 ECTS), as well as having passed the following subjects of the first grade:
The students, individually, have to develop a research project, which they have to present a written memory.
It is necessary to include the following sections, with the contents adapted to the type of methodology used (quantitative / qualitative):
The students also have to present and orally defend their project before a committee and with audiovisual support.
The final bachelor thesis is carried out individually and does not imply the realization of practical work.
Detailed information on the entire process is available at the following link:
http://www.uab.cat/web/informacio-academica/grau-infermeria-1345678310996.html
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Supervised | |||
TUTORIALS | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 2, 4, 10, 6, 11 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
PREPARATION OF WRITTEN WORKS / READING OF ARTICLES /INTEREST REPORTS | 190 | 7.6 | 2, 7, 4, 5, 10, 8, 11 |
The evaluation of the Final bachelor thesis is based on the follow-up that the tutor makes of the student's work and on the evaluation of a tribunal formed by 2 professors of the defence and oral presentation. In the evaluation of the Final bachelor thesis, both the content of the work and the attitude of the student during the tutorials and the presentation of defence will be taken into account.
The continuous evaluation is presented in 3 reports made by the tutor in which the content and form of the written report and the responsibility and participation of the student in the tutorials are valued. In the evaluation of the presentation the following aspects are taken into account: the design of the audiovisual material, the exhibition, the verbal and non-verbal language and the comprehension. In the rubric of evaluation of the oral presentation, the weight of each of these aspects is detailed. The maximum time of the oral presentation should not exceed 15 minutes. The committee will control the duration and will terminate the presentation if this time is exceeded.
The final grade will be the weighted average of the continuous evaluation and the presentation, with the following weights:
Conditions to calculate the final grade
1. That the score of the first evaluation report is equal to or greater than 5. If a lower score is obtained, the student will have 15 days to review and modify their work and re-submit the first instalment to be evaluated. In this case, the grade cannot be higher than 5 (approved).
2. Considering that the first criterion is fulfilled, the other condition is that the score of the second and third report is equal to or greater than 5. In the case of a lower score, the student will not be able to make the oral presentation and his or her grade will be DISCONTINUED.
Example:
Final score:
6 · 0.30 + 7 · 0.20 + 9 · 0.20 + 8 · 0.30 = 1.8 + 1.4 + 1.8 + 2.4 = 7.4 NOTABLE
Definition of not evaluable
It will be considered NOT EVALUABLE the student that does not present the first delivery or that the grade of this first delivery is less than 5.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Written evaluation through objective tests (written work) | 70% | 20 | 0.8 | 1, 2, 7, 3, 4, 5, 10, 6, 8, 9, 11 |
Evaluation practic type (oral presentation) | 30% | 5 | 0.2 | 1, 2, 7, 3, 4, 5, 10, 6, 8, 9, 11 |
None.