Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500260 Social Education | OB | 2 | A |
2500261 Education Studies | OB | 2 | A |
In order to course this subject we recommend to have previously taken the “El procés ensenyament-aprenentatge” (The teaching-learning process) subject.
1.Curricular Design and Theory: theoretical and applied aspects
-Conceptualisation and characteristics of the curricular design.
-Curricular and design components.
-Planning models and curricular design.
2.Planning elaboration and formative programme.
-Curricular concreteness and contextualization.
-Identify the educational and formative needs.
2.Planning and formative programme follow-up and evaluation.
-Evaluation planning and programme dimensions.
-Evaluation programme models
- Design a distinctive evaluation of planning and programmes (evaluation of needs until impact evaluation)
-Evaluation strategies, methods, techniques and tools.
The methodology of the subject begins with the learning process of the Student. In order to understand this principle, the Student will have to remain active and self-sufficient during the whole process, being the professor’s mission to be helpful with this task. In this sense the professor’s tasks will be:
1) To give support to the Student providing him at all time with all the information and the resources needed for a good learning process.
2) To assure the autonomous Student knowledge proposing different teaching-learning activities (individuals and collective, theoretical and practical) under the principle of methodical varieties.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Face to Face Seminars | 30 | 1.2 | 5, 3, 2, 8, 4, 6, 11, 12, 13, 7, 10, 14, 16, 17 |
Whole group, on-line | 60 | 2.4 | 5, 3, 1, 4, 6, 11, 12, 13, 7, 10 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Collective evaluation and hand in via Virtual Platform, the 3 practical tasks | 60 | 2.4 | 13, 17 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Reading the dossier: didactical units, study and preparation for the exam evaluations | 150 | 6 | 5, 3, 4, 6, 11, 12, 13, 10, 16, 17 |
The student will have to hand in two different tasks in order to get evaluated:
-3 practical evaluation tasks, in group (1 from the first part, 1 from the second part and 1 for the third part)
-3 Individual exams (1 for each part).
The practical evaluation tasks have a formative aim from their evaluation standing point, as they will be revised by the group depending on the given task. This revision will be done during the seminars that are considered by presenting the group project’s final results to the rest of the classmates. The theoretical exams, divided into each one of the content parts considered, have an adding aim and have to be an individual summary of the realization, discussion and reflection of the group project. In the case of failing an evaluation task there will be a chance to recuperate it and the end on a given date.
Practical delivery one and the individual exam, at the end of block 1.
Practical delivery two and the Pratical evaluation tasks, at the end of block 2.
Practical delivery three and the Teoretical evaluation tasks, at the end of block 3
The practices and recovery exam and tasks will be made and will delivered in June
It has to be taken under consideration that the feed-back and the handed back activities and tasks will be done in a period of twenty days. The making and exceeding of all the evaluating tasks (practical and theoretical) is essential for passing the subject, at the same time the assistance to 80% of the on-site classes. In any doubt of plagiarism, the subject will be considered failed by all means.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 exam Block 1 (individual evaluation) | 15% | 0 | 0 | 3, 2, 4, 6, 11, 12, 13, 10, 14 |
1 exam block 2 (individual evaluation) | 15% | 0 | 0 | 3, 1, 4, 6, 11, 12, 13, 7, 10, 15 |
1 exam block 3 (Individual evaluation) | 15% | 0 | 0 | 3, 1, 4, 6, 11, 12, 13, 7, 10, 14 |
Group project presentation of everything learned | 10% | 0 | 0 | 5, 8, 13, 14, 16 |
Hand in 3 practical evaluation tasks. (peer-evaluation) | 45% | 0 | 0 | 5, 3, 2, 9, 8, 4, 6, 11, 12, 13, 7, 10, 14, 16, 17 |
Bolívar, A. (2017). Una ética profesional en la formación y las relaciones universitarias, en Perez y Rodriguez (Coords). Buenas prácticas docentes del profesorado universitario, 15-30. Octaedro
Cortella, M.S. (2017). Convivencia, ética y educación. Madrid: Narcea.
Diz, M.J. (2017). Necesidades formativas. Modelos para su análisis y evaluación. Revista de estudios e investigación en psicología y educación, Volumen Extraordinario (6), 6-10.
Fernández, T. y Ponce, L. (2016). Elaboración, gestión y evaluación de proyectos sociales (volumen 2). Madrid: Pirámide.
Fernández, T. y Ponce, L. (2016). Planificación y actuación estratégica de proyectos sociales. Intervención social y programación (volumen 1). Madrid: Pirámide.
Gijón, J. (coord.) (2016). Formación por competencias y competencias para la formación. Perspectivas desde la investigación. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.
Jimena, J. (2019). Estudio sociocomunitario para la detección de necesidades socioculturales y socioeducativas en la ciudad de Oviedo. Conference: VIII Congreso Internacional multidisciplinar de investigación educativa. CIMIE2019. Lleida, 4-5 Julio.
Martínez, J.E., Tobón, S. y López, E. (2019). Currículo: un análisis desde un enfoque socioformativo.IE Revista de investigación educativa de la REDIECH, 10 (8), 43-63.
Murillo, F.J; Román, M y Hernández, R. (2011). Evaluación educativa para la justicia social. Revista iberoamericana de evaluación educativa, 4 (1), 8-23.
Navio, A. (2007) Análisis y detección de necesidades, en Tejada, J. y Giménez, V. (Coord.) Formación de formadores. Escenario aula, Madrid:Thomson, 69-151
Ruiz, C. (2007). La evaluación de la formación, en Tejada, J. y Giménez, V. (Coord.) Formación de formadores. Escenario aula, Madrid:Thomson, 649-698.
Ruiz Bueno, C y Garcia Orriols, J. (2019). ¿Que nos aporta el modelo de patrones de aprendizaje para el diseño de acciones formativas? Revista Colombiana de Educación. 77, 1-21.
Serrate, S; González, M y Olmos, S. (2017). La acción socioeducativa interdisciplinar en la etapa de educación secundaria. Situación y necesidades profesionales. Revista de educación, 376, pp 200-228.
Tejada, J. (2007) Evaluación de programas, en TEJADA, J. Y GIMÉNEZ, V. (Coord.) Formación de formadores. Escenario institucional, Madrid:Thomson, pp. 391-465
Tejada, J. y Navio, A. (2007) Elaboración de planes, programas y cursos de formación, en TEJADA, J. Y GIMÉNEZ, V. (Coord.) Formación de formadores. Escenario aula, Madrid:Thomson, 153-206
Tejada, J. Y Ferrández, E. (2007) La evaluación de impacto de la formación como estrategia de mejora en las organizaciones, Revista electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 9, (2)
Tejada, J y Ruiz, C. (2016). Evaluación de competencias profesionales en educación superior: retos e implicaciones. Educación XX1, 19.1, 17-38
UNESCO. (2015). Repensar l'educació. Vers un bé comú mundial? Barcelona: Centro UNESCO Catalunya.
No software required