The evaluation of the subject will consist of four items:

Module 1: Group work. [35%]

• At the beginning of the course, the lecturer will set a series of work groups. Each group will have to work on a specific question or topic by using ethnographic information extracted from ehraf World Cultures files. 
• Complete guidelines, evaluation criteria, format issues and delivery deadline will be available at the course's Moodle.

Module 2: Co-evaluation by group members. [5%]. This module is excluded from re-assessment.

• Team members should evaluate the performance of their team members.
• Due to the nature of this assessment, the module is excluded from re-assessment.

Module 3: Exam. [40%].

• The specific kind of exam (in situ, online, test, short question, etc.) shall be adapted to the dynamics of the course. The teacher will inform the students well in advance.
• The specific date of the exam, as well as the materials required, will be specified at the course's Moodle.

Module 4. Active participation and classroom activities. [20%]. This module is excluded from re-assessment.

• This module will assess each student's active involvement and participation throughout the semester. The continuous dynamics of evaluation do not make this module's re-assessment possible.
• The dates of tests andsubmissions are specified in the course calendar, published in Moodle at the beginning of the semester. Any change will be duly announced.

Procedure for reviewing grades awarded.

• On carrying out each assessment activity, lecturers will inform students (on Moodle) of the procedures to be followed for reviewing all grades awarded, and the date on which such a review will take place.

Consideration of "Not avaluable."

• In order to get a final course grading, the student must complete at least modules 1 and 3.
• Therefore, a student who has not completed these modules during the semester will NOT be EVALUABLE.
• If the student is assessable but fails to pass modules 1 or 3, s/he can reassess them at the date established by the Academic Administration (published on Moodle).

 Conditions for re-assessment.

• Modules 1 and 3 can be re-assessed. However, in order to do so, the student must comply with the conditions mentioned above.
• Modules 1 and 3 will require a minimum grade of 3.5 to do this weighting. Any lower grade would require the student to reassess that module.
• Having met these conditions, the student must retake the suspended module(s) if the subject's final grade, calculated according to the weighting explained, is lower than 5.

The highest grade in a re-assessment exercise will be 5.

Other conditions.

• The final course grade will result from the weighting indicatedin each module.
• The subject will be considered as passed if the final grade, calculated according to such weighting, is equal to or higher than 5.

Other general evaluation considerations.

• Evaluation evidences delivered beyond the due date or not fitting the format standards will not be accepted.

Plagiarism 

• All sources must be appropriately quoted (see Moodle for further information). 
• Should any question about what does constitute plagiarism arise, please find more information at the guide "Com citar i com evitar el plagi" (Faculty of Politics and Sociology of the UAB) for students [in catalan]

In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place.

In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.