Assessment

The evaluation of the subject is understood as a continuous process that extends during the lecture period and is developed through 3 (three) activities.

^{Activity 1: Commentary (30%)}

Delivery of a critic essay linking 3 texts proposed in the course programme.

^{Activity 2: Presentation in group (30%)}

Oral presentation in class of a maximum of 10 minutes in groups of three people of an analysis work of a minimum of 10 hours of participant observation or/and audiovisual material chosen by the students, 2 readings to choose between the options proposed in this teaching guide, composed of a compulsory reading and an additional reading, and one extra reading freely chosen. Each reading option can be chosen by only 1 group of students.

This activity is divided in three deliveries:

-        A script of the presentation showing the readings and the audiovisual material or participant observation chosen and the reasons why you chose them (20% of the qualification)

-        Power point or prezzi of the oral presentation (10% of the qualification)

-        Oral presentation (60% of the qualification divided in 40% grade assigned by the teaching staff and 20% grade assigned by the students through the co-evaluation)

^{Test (40%)}

Individual written test in class on the content of lectures, including compulsory readings, presentations and related viewings

Evaluation normativity:

 -         On carrying out each evaluation activity, lecturers will inform students (on Moodle) of the procedures to be followed for reviewing all grades awarded, and the date on which such a review will take place.

-        To be considered as having passed the subject, you will need to obtain a minimum grade of 5.0 as an average grade resulting from the marks obtained in each of the activities, considering the percentage of each of them in the final grade."

-        Once the subject has been passed, it cannot be subject to a new evaluation.

-        Students will obtain a “Not assessed/Not submitted” course grade unless they have submitted more than 30% of the assessment items.

-        Those who for "attendance at meetings of the collegiate bodies of university representation or other reasons provided for in their respective regulations" [...] "cannot attend programmed evaluation activities at any time, they have the right to be programmes a different day and time for its realization ".

-        Those who participate in the different assessment activities and they need it, they will receive a justification document for this participation.

-        The ones who carry out any irregularity that can lead to a significant variation of the qualification of an evaluation activity, this and the whole subject will be qualified with 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that can be instructed.

-        The copy or plagiarism, both in the case of the works and in the case of examinations, constitutes a crime that will be sanctioned with 0 (zero) to the activity, loss of the right to re-evaluate and the entire subject will be failed. Remember that a work that reproduces all or a part of the work of a partner is considered a "copy". "Plagiarism" is to present all or part of an author's text as its own, without mentioning the sources, either on paper or in digital format. See UAB documentation on "plagiarism" at:

http://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_01.html.

-        The delivery of evaluation activities 2 days outside the deadline will have a maximun grade of 8. Between 2 and 7days, the maximum grade will be 5.

About the re-revaluation

They can re-evaluate those who:

-        Have obtained an average grade of the 3 (three) activities of at least 3.5

-        The re-evaluation will consist of a single test and will take place between on the day, time and place programmed by the Faculty.

-        The mark obtained in the re-evaluation will constitute the final grade of the subject.

Evaluation in case of virtual teaching

In the event that tests or exams cannot be taken onsite, they will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB’s virtual tools (original weighting will be maintained). Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or discussion on Teams, etc. Lecturers will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools or will offer them feasible alternatives.