Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2503998 Catalan Philology: Literary Studies and Linguistics | FB | 1 | 2 |
None.
Provide the student with a solid knowledge of the functioning of syntax of the Catalan sentence, both from a descriptive and normative point of view.
Learning activities are organized as follows:
1) Directed activities (40%)
2) Supervised activities (30%)
3) Autonomous activities (30%)
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Participation and presentations at class | 39 | 1.56 | 1, 4, 7, 6 |
Readings' discussion | 15 | 0.6 | 11, 16, 22, 9 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Essay | 35 | 1.4 | 17, 21, 11, 22, 19, 20, 27, 26 |
Exercises at class | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 4, 7, 6 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Reading | 15 | 0.6 | 17, 11, 16, 9, 28 |
Study | 30 | 1.2 | 17, 16, 9, 27 |
Assessment
Assessment is continuous. Students must provide evidence of their progress by completing tasks and tests.
To pass the course the minimum grade is a 5.
The calendar will be available on the first day of class. Students will find all information on the Virtual Campus: the description of the activities, teaching materials, and any necessary information for the proper follow-up of the subject.
In the event that tests or exams cannot be taken onsite, they will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB’s virtual tools (original weighting will be maintained). Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or discussion on Teams, etc. Lecturers will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools, or will offer them feasible alternatives.
Review
When publishing final marks prior to recording them on students' transcripts, the lecturer will announce at the Virtual Campus a date and time for reviewing assessment activities. Students must arrange reviews in agreement with the lecturer.
Missed/failed assessment activities
Students may retake assessment activities they have failed or compensate for any they have missed, provided that those they have actually performed account for a minimum of 66.6% (two thirds) of the subject's final mark and that they have a weighted average mark of at least 3.5. The maximum final mark for the reassessment is 5.
The lecturer will inform students of the procedure involved at the Virtual Campus when publishing final marks prior to recording them on transcripts. The lecturer may set one assignment per failed or missed assessment activity or a single assignment to cover a number of such activities.
Classification as "not assessable"
In the event of theassessment activities a student has performed accounting for just 25% or less of the subject's final mark, their work will be classified as "not assessable" on their transcript.
Misconduct in assessment activities
Students who engage in misconduct (plagiarism, copying, personation, etc.) in an assessment activity will receive a mark of “0” for the activity in question. In the case of misconduct in more than one assessment activity, the students involved will be given a final mark of “0” for the subject.
Students may not retake assessment activities in which they are found to have engaged in misconduct. Plagiarism is considered to mean presenting all or part of an author's work, whether published in print or in digital format, as one's own, i.e. without citing it. Copying is considered to mean reproducing all or a substantial part of another student's work. In cases of copying in which it is impossible to determine which of two students has copied the work of the other, both will be penalized.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Exercises | 15% | 2 | 0.08 | 1, 4, 2, 5, 7, 8, 23, 21, 6, 15, 14, 10, 13, 25 |
Group essay | 25% | 0.5 | 0.02 | 18, 3, 4, 17, 21, 11, 16, 22, 19, 9, 20, 27, 26 |
Knowledge test | 50% | 2 | 0.08 | 18, 3, 1, 4, 2, 7, 8, 23, 6, 12, 15, 14, 10, 13, 11, 24, 25 |
Participation and readings' discussion in class | 10% | 1.5 | 0.06 | 2, 17, 5, 12, 11, 16, 22, 9, 20, 24, 28 |
Institut d’Estudis Catalans. 2016. Gramàtica de la llengua catalana. Institut d’Estudis Catalans.
Joan Solà, Maria Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró & Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds.), Gramàtica del Català Contemporani. Barcelona: Empúries.
Descriptive and normative syntax
Pérez Saldanya, Manuel & Gemma Rigau. 2018. La Gramàtica de la llengua catalana de l’Institut d’Estudis Catalans. Llengua & Literatura 28. 227–236.
Rigau, Gemma. 2018. Norma i descripció gramatical. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans. Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzLW156CycI
Syntactic units and their structure
Bosque, Ignacio & Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach. 2009. Fundamentos de sintaxis formal. Lingüística. Madrid: Akal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2. cap. 3. Las palabras y los sintagmas I: la estructura de los constituyentes.
The sentence
Bel, Aurora. 2008. Les funcions sintàctiques. In Joan Solà, Maria Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró & Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds.), Gramàtica del Català Contemporani, vol. 2, 1075–1147. Barcelona: Empúries.
Bosque, Ignacio & Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach. 2009. Fundamentos de sintaxis formal. Lingüística. Madrid: Akal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2. sec. 4.1-4.2.
Word order
Vallduví, Enric. 2008. L’oració com a unitat informativa. In Joan Solà, Maria Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró & Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds.), Gramàtica del Català Contemporani, vol. 2, 1223–1279. Barcelona: Empúries.
Villalba, Xavier. 2019. El orden de palabras en contraste. Madrid: Arco/Libros.