Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2501913 English and French | OT | 3 | 0 |
2501913 English and French | OT | 4 | 0 |
2502533 French Studies | OB | 3 | 2 |
There are not any special prerequirements
In this topic, included in French Linguistics, the goal is to give the student the ressources necessary to carry out a semantic and pragmatic analysis of present-day documents in French in their oral dimension as well in their written dimension.
Introduction : the semantic and pragmatic components of language
I Semantics
1. Lexical semantics
2. Grammatical semantics
II Pragmatics
Master class with TIC and collective discussion
Analysis of lexical, semantic and pragmatic phenomena
Individual and collective exercises
Autonomous activities: exercises, exam preparation, readings, writings, Internet search
Interaction in class (teacher-student, student-student)
Oral and/or written exams
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Tutorials | 45 | 1.8 | 1, 6, 2, 8 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Exercises | 20 | 0.8 | 1, 2, 8 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Master class, discussions, exams | 80 | 3.2 | 1, 2, 8 |
Assessment will be continuous. It will include all the work done during the term, the exams (which number will vary depending on the rhythm in which the program will be completed) as well the exercises done during all the term. Mid-term exams will be corrected in class and students will be able to ask any doubt about assessment. In the final exam, a date of revision will be fixed.
- If a student has not done any of the mid-term exams, (s)he will not be assessed.
- Remedial exam will only be avalaible to students who, having done the continuous assessment, have failed. But they will have not right to remedial exam if their average is inferior to 3,5 /10 or if they have not done at least 2/3 of the required tasks. Tasks not done will not be remediated (in this case the assessment will be 0/10) or the activities done in course. If the student has not got an average of pass, he will have to do a final exam including all the topics.
Plagiarism: Total or partial plagiarism of any exercise will be automatically failed (0) of the plagiarised exercise. TO PLAGIARISE is copying from non identified sources from a text, even if it is one single phrase, which is appropriated by someone who is not the real author (it includes copying phrases or Internet passages and adding them without modification to the text which is presented as one's own). It is a serious offense.
In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.
In the event that tests or exams cannot be taken onsite,they will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB’s virtual tools (original weighting will be maintained). Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or discussion on Teams, etc. Lecturers will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools, or will offer them feasible alternatives.
Particular cases: Students whose mother tongue is French will have to achieve the same assessment conditions than the rest of students. Students are the exclusive responsible of monitoring formative and assessment activities.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Exams | 50 | 4 | 0.16 | 3, 1, 6, 4, 2, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 |
Interaction in class | 25 | 0 | 0 | 3, 1, 6, 2, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 |
Participation in collective analysis | 25 | 1 | 0.04 | 1, 6, 2, 7, 8, 9, 5 |
BAYLON, C. et MIGNOT X. (1995). Sémantique du langage, collection « Fac linguistique ». Paris : Nathan.
BENVENISTE, E. (1966). Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris : Gallimard.
DUCROT, O. et alii (1980). Les mots du discours. Paris : Les Ed. de Minuit.
GARDES-TAMINE, J. (1990). La Grammaire, collection « Cursus ». Paris : Armand Colin.
Tome I Phonologie, morphologie, lexicologie ; tome II Syntaxe
GARRIC N. et CALAS F. (2007). Introduction à la pragmatique. Paris : Hachette
GROSS G. (1996). Les expressions figées en français. Noms composés et autres locutions, Paris : Ophrys.
HUOT, H. (2005). La morphologie. Forme et sens des mots du français, 2e éd., collection « Cursus ». Paris : Armand Colin.
KLEIBER, G. (1999). Problèmes de sémantique. La polysémie en questions, collection « Sens et structure». Villeneuve d'Ascq : Presses universitaires du Septentrion.
LEHMANN A. et MARTIN-BERTHET F. (2008). Introduction à la lexicologie. Sémantique et morphologie, collection « Lettres sup ». Paris : Armand-Colin.
KERBRAT-ORECCHIONI, C. (1996). La conversation. Paris : Seuil.
MORTUREUX, M.-F. (2004). La lexicologie entre langue et discours, collection « Campus ». Paris : Armand-Colin.
POLGUÈRE, A. (2008). Lexicologie et sémantique lexicale. Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal.
POTTIER, B. (1974). Linguistique générale. Théorie et description. Paris : Klincksieck.
REBOUL, A. et MOESCHLER J.(1998). La pragmatique aujourd'hui, collection « Points Essais », n° 371. Paris : Éditions du Seuil.
SARFATI G. et PAVEAU M.-A. (2014). Les grandes théories linguistiques. De la grammaire comparée à la pragmatique, collection U. Paris : Armand Colin.
TESNIÈRE, L. (1982). Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris : Klincksieck.
Grammars:
CHARAUDEAU, P. (1992). Grammaire du sens et de l’expression. Paris : Hachette.
GREVISSE, M. et GOOSSE A. (1989). Nouvelle grammaire française. Louvain : Duculot.
LE GOFFIC, P. (1992). Grammaire de la phrase française. Paris : Hachette.
RIEGEL, M. et alii (1998). Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris : P.U.F.